Acunetix vs Rapid7 Metasploit comparison

Invicti and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Vulnerability Management category. Invicti is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3, while Rapid7 is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.2. Invicti holds a 1.3% mindshare in VM, compared to Rapid7’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Invicti users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Acunetix and Rapid7 Metasploit compete in the security testing category. Acunetix appears to have an advantage in web application assessments with comprehensive features and ease of use, while Rapid7 Metasploit's strength lies in its exploit capabilities and integration options, despite a more complex interface.

Features: Acunetix specializes in scheduling and Interactive Application Security Testing, providing a robust solution for identifying vulnerabilities. It offers flexible reporting, scalability, ease of use, and effectively reduces false positives. Rapid7 Metasploit is known for its extensive exploit library, focus on network vulnerability assessments, and automation capabilities, appealing to users interested in comprehensive penetration testing and exploit development.

Room for Improvement: Acunetix could enhance manual testing controls, further decrease false positives, and broaden authentication options. Users find pricing and scan flexibility occasionally challenging. Rapid7 Metasploit might benefit from expanding its exploit database, better mobile capabilities, and improving user-friendliness, particularly in its graphical interface.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Acunetix provides versatile deployment options, from on-premises to hybrid cloud, with its support noted as responsive, though sometimes delayed. Rapid7 Metasploit supports various deployment environments, but its ticket-based support system is slower and could improve with faster response times and enhanced user assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Acunetix, regarded by some as expensive due to recent price increases, offers significant value through a comprehensive feature set and proven ROI in enhancing security postures. Rapid7 Metasploit benefits from a community edition that is open-source, delivering competitive pricing, especially for those who need fewer features and appreciate a strong community-backed framework.

To learn more, read our detailed Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Zafran Security

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Zafran Security is 0.6%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Acunetix is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 Metasploit is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

Israel Cavazos Landini

Associate Director IT Security Operations at Novartis

Weekly insights and risk analysis facilitate informed security decisions

I appreciate the weekly insights Zafran provides, which include critical topics for networks and IT security, allowing us to evaluate which insights apply to our environment. The organization score feature is valuable to keep the leadership team updated on how our infrastructure fares security-wise. The applicable risk level versus base risk level feature is beneficial because prior to Zafran, we only used the base risk level, but now understand that risk depends on the asset itself. Zafran is an excellent tool.

Read full review

AnubhavGoswami

Compliance Manager at Compunnel

Attractive automated reports with boost user productivity and an easy setup

The primary use is mainly related to vulnerability assessment, including both public and internal IP addresses By using this tool, we have reduced the workload and increased the productivity of users. It generates automated reports. This feature is beneficial when sharing reports with clients as…

Read full review

Mani Bommisetty

Infrastructure patching Manager at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Comprehensive insights with robust vulnerability detection and streamlined alert management

Rapid7 has a significant advantage in providing a clear picture of my environment. It provides insight and incident detection response capabilities. When deployed with the same agent in servers or endpoints, it identifies vulnerabilities and monitors data transmission to external sources. Rapid7 offers comprehensive features within one platform, eliminating the need to integrate multiple tools to see all alerts in one place.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are able to see the real risk of a vulnerability on our environment with our security tools."

"Zafran has become an indispensable tool in our cybersecurity arsenal."

"Zafran is an excellent tool."

"For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature."

"I find it to be one of the most comprehensive tools, with support for manual intervention."

"I haven't seen reporting of that level in any other tool."

"It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed at which it can scan multiple domains in just a few hours."

"The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning time depends on the application's code."

"The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great."

"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that."

More Acunetix pros

"I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation."

"When I compare Metasploit with Nessus, I find that Metasploit is faster and it does not burden the system as much."

"Rapid7 has a significant advantage in providing a clear picture of my environment."

"The solution is open source and has many small targetted penetration tests that have been written by many people that are useful. You can choose different subjects for the test, such as Oracle databases or Apache servers."

"It is scalable. It's in line with our needs."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is a useful product."

"I don't have any other tools like it, and I always use it when I'm doing a pen test. Metasploit is a great solution for penetration testing,"

"The tool's most useful feature for penetration testing is its automation capabilities. With the professional edition, you can upload the results from Nessus in the Rapid7 Metasploit solution portal."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pros

Cons

"Initially, we were somewhat concerned about the scalability of Zafran due to our large asset count and the substantial amount of information we needed to process."

"The vulnerability identification speed should be improved."

"The solution's pricing could be better."

"It is difficult to create a proxy connection."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing."

"It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

"In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us."

"When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

"It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved."

More Acunetix cons

"Better automation capabilities would be an improvement."

"The reporting feature needs improvement."

"The solution is not very scalable, it does not provide any automation to be able to scale it."

"The initial setup was a bit "tweaky" for the open-source version."

"If your company's patch is not up to date, but you have other detection or defense solutions such as endpoint detection and response and antivirus software, the product exploit may not work effectively. This is because its exploit database update process is slow and not real-time. For zero-day vulnerabilities or new security threats, relying on Rapid7 Metasploit alone may not be effective."

"Advanced Infrastructure should be implemented in the next release for better orchestration."

"Rapid7 Metasploit could be made easier for new users to learn."

"We'd like them to offer better coverage of malware."

More Rapid7 Metasploit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"When compared with other products, the pricing is a little bit high. But it gives value for the price. It serves the purpose and is worthwhile for the price we pay."

"The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

"The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000."

"The cost is based on two types of licenses, ConsultLite, and ConsultPlus, as well as the number of domains that are scanned."

"Implementing Acunetix needs a medium or larger business agency, because you need some money to get Acunetix. It is costly, but if you care about your agency's security, then maybe it's a cost that might help you in the future."

"All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio."

"It is a bit expensive. If you need to check five applications, you have to pay almost 14,000. It is an agreement for two years at 7,000 per year for only five applications. You cannot change the applications in the license. So, you are stuck with the same license for the five applications for one full year."

"The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable."

More Acunetix pricing and cost advice

"I have used the free version of Rapid7 Metasploit."

"We pay monthly. The pricing is reasonable."

"The cost is approximately $15 per device."

"The pricing structure involves a one-time purchase cost of approximately twenty thousand dollars or euros for all customers."

"The great advantage with Rapid7 Metasploit, of course, is that it's free."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the product's pricing a six. So it's fairly priced."

"It is expensive. Our license expired, and our company is not thinking to renew because of our budget."

"Rapid7 Metasploit is cheaper than Tenable.io Vulnerability Management."

More Rapid7 Metasploit pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zafran Security?

I find that the pricing for Zafran aligns well with the comprehensive features it offers. The asset and user-based li...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zafran Security?

Zafran is a new startup. Features are continuously being added or improved. 1) Continued integrations with existing (...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zafran Security?

We connect this to our vulnerability scanner as input, our security tools to better determine risk, and our change ma...

See all answers

What do you like most about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

The tool's most valuable feature is scan configurations. We use it for external physical applications. The scanning t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I typically use Acunetix ( /products/acunetix-reviews ) to identify vulnerabilities for clients.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner?

I would recommend Acunetix to others. Overall, I rate this solution seven out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 Metasploit?

I use Rapid7 Metasploit for payload generation and Post-Exploitation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rapid7 Metasploit?

Metasploit is cheaper than Nessus and offers a more robust community edition that provides a good experience for stud...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 Metasploit?

While Metasploit excels in vulnerability assessment, it could improve in vulnerability management. Nessus currently h...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz Code vs Zafran Security

Compared 55% of the time

Vulcan Cyber vs Zafran Security

Compared 22% of the time

ServiceNow Security Operations vs Zafran Security

Compared 14% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Zafran Security

Compared 9% of the time

More Zafran Security Competitors

OWASP Zap vs Acunetix

Compared 17% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Acunetix

Compared 12% of the time

HCL AppScan vs Acunetix

Compared 10% of the time

Invicti vs Acunetix

Compared 7% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Acunetix

Compared 3% of the time

More Acunetix Competitors

Tenable Nessus vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 18% of the time

Pentera vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 11% of the time

Amazon Inspector vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 7% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs Rapid7 Metasploit

Compared 6% of the time

More Rapid7 Metasploit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

March 2025

Download Zafran Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix

April 2025

Download Acunetix product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2025

Download Rapid7 Metasploit product report

Also Known As

No data available

AcuSensor

Metasploit

Overview

Zafran Security integrates with existing security tools to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities effectively, proving that most critical vulnerabilities are not exploitable, optimizing threat management.

Zafran Security introduces an innovative operating model for managing security threats and vulnerabilities. By leveraging the threat exposure management platform, it pinpoints and prioritizes exploitable vulnerabilities, reducing risk through immediate remediation. This platform enhances your hybrid cloud security by normalizing vulnerability signals and integrating specific IT context data, such as CVE runtime presence and internet asset reachability, into its analysis. No longer reliant on patch windows, Zafran Security allows you to manage risks actively.

What are the key features of Zafran Security?

Threat Exposure Management: Utilizes existing tools to prioritize vulnerabilities and manage threats.
Integrative Analysis: Combines security data with IT context for precise vulnerability management.
Real-time Risk Reduction: Enables immediate risk management without waiting for patches.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Functions across diverse cloud environments for comprehensive security.

What benefits can users expect from Zafran Security?

Improved Security: Enhances protection by efficiently identifying and mitigating risks.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary patching expenses by confirming non-exploitable vulnerabilities.
Time Savings: Frees developers to focus on root causes by handling immediate threats.
Comprehensive Insight: Offers a holistic view of security threats and vulnerabilities.

In industries where security is paramount, such as finance and healthcare, Zafran Security provides invaluable protection by ensuring that only exploitable vulnerabilities are addressed. It allows entities to maintain robust security measures while allocating resources efficiently, fitting seamlessly into existing security strategies.

Zafran Security

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Invicti

Attackers are always developing new exploits and attack methods—Metasploit penetration testing software helps you use their own weapons against them. Utilizing an ever-growing database of exploits, you can safely simulate real-world attacks on your network to train your security team to spot and stop the real thing.

Rapid7

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New Zealand

City of Corpus Christi, Diebold, Lumenate, Nebraska Public Power District, Prairie North Regional Health, Apptio, Automation Direct, Bob's Stores, Cardinal Innovations Healthcare Solutions, Carnegie Mellon University

Buyer's Guide

Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

April 2025

Free Report: Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit

Find out what your peers are saying about Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Acunetix vs. Rapid7 Metasploit report.

See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.