Parasoft SOAtest and Checkmarx One compete in the application security and testing category. Checkmarx One generally seems to have the upper hand due to its feature set and integration capabilities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust automated testing capabilities, extensive API testing features, and valuable pricing. Checkmarx One is distinguished by its extensive security coverage, integration with modern development workflows, and diverse security testing options.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance its intuitive configuration settings, support newer technologies, and streamline its complex setup. Checkmarx One could improve its learning curve, speed up response times to customer inquiries, and offer more intuitive support materials.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest ensures a smooth deployment process with effective customer service, while Checkmarx One provides efficient deployment but has room for improvement in customer service responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: Users perceive Parasoft SOAtest's setup costs as reasonable, providing satisfactory ROI. Checkmarx One, despite higher costs, delivers significant ROI with its advanced security features.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
I would rate the stability of this solution a nine on a scale of 1 to 10 where one is low stability and 10 is high.
It could suggest how the code base is written and automatically populate the source code with three different solution options to choose from.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
My experience with the initial setup of Checkmarx One is straightforward; it is not complex compared to other tools that I have tried.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.
Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:
Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
