Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and McAfee are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while McAfee is ranked #28 with an average rating of 7.7. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of McAfee users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

McAfee Total Protection and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security compete in the domain of data loss prevention and advanced threat detection, respectively. Check Point CloudGuard seems to have an edge with advanced threat detection capabilities that appeal to development environments requiring real-time assessments.

Features: McAfee Total Protection focuses on robust data protection, easy management, and affordability as key features. Its single management platform simplifies operations for endpoint security. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security offers advanced threat detection, automation, and comprehensive multi-cloud monitoring, tailored for development environments seeking real-time security assessments and analytics.

Room for Improvement: McAfee struggles with heavy system resource usage, lack of virtual desktop features, and high support costs. Users call for enhancements in its management console. Check Point needs to address documentation availability and slow technical support, with improvements suggested for API security and third-party tool integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee favors on-premises deployment for established IT infrastructures but faces challenges in support accessibility. Check Point offers flexible deployment across hybrid and private clouds, yet both solutions experience issues with quick and efficient technical support solutions.

Pricing and ROI: McAfee is viewed as expensive, with some users noting high licensing costs despite positive ROI reports. Its pricing model involves annual fees deemed affordable due to effectiveness. Check Point is recognized for cost-effectiveness, yet users desire better pricing transparency. Both products show ROI potential, with Check Point benefiting from partnerships to mitigate costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cloudflare Web Application ...

Featured Reviews

SachidDoshi

Senior Enterprise Security Architect at HGS - Hinduja Global Solutions

Offers a huge signature repository and is superiorly effective in mitigating DDoS attacks

The solution's learning curve can still be further reduced, which presently stands at two or three months. The product has a custom rule set that users can modify and manifest as needed. The vendor can probably shorten the learning curve using cutting-edge technologies like AI. The solution provider can also work around the web applications and identify the toolset that needs to be implemented to deploy the solution in less time. The vendor has launched a SASE product that can function with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, but many improvements are needed in terms of features, such as the web filtering feature, and CASB has not yet been added.

Read full review

Mamadou Fallou Diagne

IT security and network analyst at Revenu Québec

Management team gains substantial protection while navigating ongoing configuration challenges

The most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include our approach to manage it via the management we have on-premises, and we also deploy the same extension management of CloudGuard to manage all the virtual systems on Azure. We effectively use artificial intelligence with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security, as we have teams that work with AI and we frequently manage our firewalls using AI along with the CloudGuard and all virtual systems.

Read full review

VivekGupta7

DGM at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Versatile with good patching and a straightforward setup

There is some fine-tuning needed, even once you define something. We need to do a lot of configuration. It would be easier if they made the configuration simpler, especially in the beginning. They need to give the user more choices and provide more guidance to help avoid problems later on. We'd like some more built-in predictive analytics so we can be prepared for what might happen in the future. We did have some bandwidth issues during setup. If your update fails, you may have stability issues. We find it difficult to reach higher levels of support when we face larger issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution protects our application, which runs on the HTTP protocol, from DDoS attacks."

"The product has a valuable security control functionality."

"It protects web applications efficiently."

"I'm highly satisfied. It's remarkably user-friendly, enabling me to quickly identify issues, and deploy solutions, and it offers the necessary features."

"Cloudflare WAF provides protection through rules and functionalities like Cloudflare's SDRAP."

"The stability of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall deserves a perfect 10 out of 10."

"The integration of Cloudflare with Cloud Suite is its most valuable feature."

"The rate limiting features and customizations in terms of URL match and applying policies are valuable to me."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pros

"Automation has helped a lot to identify and automatically execute policies, rules, and blocks due to its machine learning."

"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."

"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."

"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."

"Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."

"Knowing what measures we must take allows us to reduce costs associated with security in the cloud by providing early identification of a risk or a possible security breach."

"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."

"It helped us to reduce vulnerabilities."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security pros

"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."

"The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use."

"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."

"The initial setup process was easy."

"Everything in this DLP is great. It"

"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."

"Offers some good protection features."

"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pros

Cons

"There could be an option to duplicate the cluster to maintain the consistency of rules."

"A key challenge arises when dealing with numerous integrations with HVAC systems. Depending on the specifics, there might be some configuration mismatches, which necessitate specific support."

"It would be ideal if the solution offered better log integration and more integration with different platforms."

"The accuracy of the Cloudflare Web Application Firewall could be improved by reducing the number of false-negative alerts."

"We have noticed some latency when the call goes through the firewall. That could be improved."

"They need to improve their support because getting a response for basic requests took around 48 hours, which is too long."

"Support can be challenging at times."

"Their documentation could be better. They don't have documentation that explains everything well. They have documentation for everything you're looking for, but they lack a single piece of documentation to tie everything together. As a new user or beginner, it took us a little bit of time to figure out how to put all these things in place."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall cons

"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."

"The costs are not transparent."

"There needs to be better security around API integration."

"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."

"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it."

"The enhancements are needed in the logging system and log management processes."

"The solution should improve false-positives."

"The ease of use could be better."

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security cons

"The pricing is high for licensing and support and the GUI interface is good but could use updating."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by making the customer aware of the benefits of the solution which would increase the adoption. Additionally, if there were features to suit multi-cloud environments it would be helpful. If the solution can intelligently identify which is important data for the organization and should not be released from the organization without authorization would be a benefit."

"We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"There needs to be support for blocking the sending of files by email because even if you block or remove an external disk, the files are not protected."

"There are a lot of vulnerabilities and viruses and malware can proliferate."

"We need to do a lot of configuration."

"The solution takes up too much CPU and memory."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The annual licensing fee is $10,000 USD."

"Cloudflare offers different types of subscriptions for businesses, enterprises, and personal users, and the pricing is negotiable."

"The solution's pricing option needs to be more transparent for enterprise clients."

"The solution is expensive."

"Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is more affordable than other solutions."

"The pricing model is very straightforward compared to the competition. You just pay per month for the product and usage."

"It is not too pricey."

"What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? I believe the pricing is not the best, but it's reasonable and acceptable. We also use the McAfee system in parallel. In terms of pricing, its okay - not great, but not bad either. It falls in the middle, which is acceptable. In terms of support licensing, last time, we were searching for a solution, and we considered products from resellers rather than directly from the cloud provider. However, the pricing we encountered was exceptionally high. As a result, we are inclined to select support from the reseller."

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall pricing and cost advice

"It is extremely affordable and high value for cost."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"It's not a cheap option."

"The pricing seems expensive both for the license and the support."

"I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."

"The price of the solution could improve, it is expensive. We typically sell one and three-year licenses."

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

12%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Non Profit

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The product has a valuable security control functionality.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

The price of Cloudflare Web Application Firewall is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall?

I cannot say much about areas of improvement for Cloudflare Web Application Firewall because I haven't gone through d...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spectral?

We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spectral?

Pricing and licensing modules need to be improved.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spectral?

There are still areas for improvement with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security. All the features we have on the fire...

See all answers

What do you like most about McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The tool focuses on endpoints rather than networks. Endpoints cover everything. It wouldn't be possible to steal conf...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention?

The product’s pricing could be cheaper.

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiWeb vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 13% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

Barracuda WAF-as-a-Service vs Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

Compared 6% of the time

More Cloudflare Web Application Firewall Competitors

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Compared 61% of the time

Snyk vs Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Compared 39% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 78% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 4% of the time

Trellix DLP vs McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Compared 3% of the time

More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall

August 2025

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall report

Download Cloudflare Web Application Firewall product report

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

August 2025

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security report

Download Check Point CloudGuard Code Security product report

Buyer's Guide

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

July 2025

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report

Download McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention product report

Also Known As

Cloudflare WAF

Spectral

McAfee Total Protection for Data, McAfee Total Protection for DLP, Total Protection for Data, Intel Security Total Protection for Data

Overview

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall's intuitive dashboard enables users to build powerful rules through easy clicks and also provides Terraform integration. Every request to the WAF is inspected against the rule engine and the threat intelligence curated from protecting over 27 Million websites. Suspicious requests can be blocked, challenged or logged as per the needs of the user while legitimate requests are routed to the destination, agnostic of whether it lives on-premise or in the cloud. Analytics and Cloudflare Logs enable visibility into actionable metrics for the user.

Cloudflare

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security enhances application and site security in Microsoft Azure, detecting vulnerabilities, preventing breaches, and safeguarding against malicious activities while ensuring compliance and improving code quality.

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security, designed for cloud and on-premise environments, scans applications configurations, detects exposed credentials, and aligns with legal frameworks. It offers simple implementation, centralized management, customizable rules, and improved security practices. It supports multiple clouds, offers real-time data loss prevention, advanced posture management, and remediation guidance. It enhances policy enforcement and provides powerful analytics, intuitive dashboards, and automation for reduced human error and better security.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security?

Simple Implementation: Easy to deploy and start securing environments quickly.
Broad Language Validation: Supports multiple coding languages for fast identification of security issues.
Real-Time Data Loss Prevention: Continuously monitors and mitigates data leakage risks.
Powerful Analytics: Provides in-depth insights and detailed reports for better decision-making.
Centralized Management: Allows control and oversight from a single interface.
Intuitive Dashboards: User-friendly displays for monitoring security status and trends.
Improved Security Practices: Encourages the adoption of better security measures.
Strong Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats rapidly.
Automation: Reduces human error by automating routine security tasks.
Customization: Enables tailored security rules to meet specific needs.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating Check Point CloudGuard Code Security?

Reduced Human Error: Automation and robust features lessen the risk of mistakes.
Enhanced Policy Enforcement: Ensures consistent application of security policies.
Time Savings: Streamlined processes save valuable time for security teams.
Secure Remote Connections: Protects data during remote access.
Fast Risk Identification: Quickly identifies and addresses vulnerabilities.
Advanced Posture Management: Comprehensive oversight of security posture.

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is vital in industries where securing cloud and on-premise environments is critical. For instance, in finance, it aids in regulatory compliance and protects sensitive data. Healthcare relies on it for safeguarding patient information, while tech companies use it to protect intellectual property during development. In retail, it enhances security against cyber threats, securing transaction data and customer information.

Check Point Software Technologies

McAfee Total Protection for Data solution suite protects your data using a combination of powerful encryption, access control, and user-behavior monitoring.

McAfee

Sample Customers

crunchbase, udacity, marketo, okcupid, zendesk

Doddle, Bangalore International Airport, Grupo financiero ACOBO, DigitalTrack

Kleberg Bank

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

July 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.