We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard Code Security and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Check Point CloudGuard Code Security helps to improve the code security of our company, generating rapid and complete assessments to be able to make decisions for improvements."
"You can maintain a legal framework structure at all times."
"The data center security system has provided real-time analytics on performance and data configuration processes."
"Compared to what we used before, it's helping us to be more efficient in managing our traffic."
"We have had a number of real events where developers accidentally made commits of API keys, and we were able to detect and begin response actions in minutes. We had the API key revoked in less than five minutes in such events."
"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."
"Having a cloud detection response helps to very quickly identify security threats in our environment."
"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."
"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."
"The solution is stable."
"The overall features of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention are very good."
"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."
"Enables customization of file types and for different scenarios."
"The ability to block all USBs from the McAfee portal has been great."
"I am impressed with the tool's firewalls and web protection."
"The most valuable feature of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is data loss prevention."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"They could include web functionalities such as sandboxing."
"The ease of use could be better."
"It is generally difficult to find documentation about the product, and there is relatively little to find."
"There are a lot of opportunities for how they can use their technology to do more. That would be more like sensitive data discovery and other things besides Git Repos, but then you are expanding the scope of what necessarily their product is."
"There needs to be better security around API integration."
"We need to have many of the baselines or development guides providing less complex writing or development."
"I am satisfied with the performance and results enhanced by this product since we deployed it."
"The costs are not transparent."
"McAfee needs to clarify its rules."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."
"The licensing cost for McAfee Total Protection could be cheaper, but apart from that, I don't need anything else. The software has what I need."
"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."
"We faced many issues with the solution's customer support, and it should be made customer-friendly and more responsive."
"Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox."
"The product uses a lot of resources and because of this it is not always a good solution for every situation."
"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More Check Point CloudGuard Code Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is ranked 11th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 11 reviews while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is rated 8.4, while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security writes "Good security and functionality with helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is most compared with Snyk, Aqua Cloud Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with HP Wolf Security, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention. See our Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs. McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
