All original equipment manufacturers mention zero-day attacks and the exploitation of previously unknown vulnerabilities, and Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) also includes this feature. As a tool, it is good, but I did not observe any extraordinary service from Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) regarding zero-day attack protection. It is a good feature, but I did not find particularly unique characteristics.
Regarding total cost of ownership, I cannot describe this accurately. Concerning the price for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) and license costs, the pricing is good, and the approach could be better.
Learn what your peers think about Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2026.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive. It is a little bit expensive. You cannot avoid this from an Israeli product. Israeli products follow a certain pricing model. If they could reduce the cost a bit, then they can compete with Palo Alto. Palo Alto is leading, Cisco is down, and Palo Alto is coming up. There is something peculiar in the market. Cisco for the last three or four quarters has been very down. In fact, last year they made very less profits. However, Palo Alto was somewhere in the cloud. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is also coming up, but not the Palo Alto.
IT Support at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
Nov 9, 2025
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is straightforward, with the service being available as a fully managed service, and the pricing depending on traffic volume, number of protected applications, and cloud provider. I do not have a problem with this area.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing and licensing seem fair but not the simplest, as the licensing is flexible and subscription-based. While it can feel complex to estimate the upfront cost depending on traffic volume and features enabled, the initial setup cost is straightforward with minimal infrastructure costs, though fine-tuning and integrating took extra time, which adds to the indirect setup cost in terms of experienced resources.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward without any challenges.
Senior Manager Head of Security Operations at a educational organization with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
Feb 5, 2025
The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others.
As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past. Regarding the reduction of the overall total cost of ownership, I am not deeply involved with cost management. However, feedback from a senior manager indicates that we have made a positive decision.
Information Technology - Infrastructure and Security at Cyprus Development Bank
Real User
Top 5
Feb 4, 2025
Pricing and licensing are really expensive for this product. While it provides a very good security level, the price for each service is high. Small organizations might not be able to afford the price.
The setup cost is very simple. It is a really good price considering the functionalities of the product and the price of the license. It is very well-calibrated.
I am less knowledgeable with prices because I only define the requirements and look at the execution. I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
Cyber security manager at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 5
Feb 4, 2025
It didn't lower the TCO, it actually raised it, in my opinion. It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money. Check Point is cheaper than Radware. It is relatively cheaper for a WAF solution which is something that we liked and made us choose it. It is a bit difficult to know the price differences since everything is always included in a bundle.
The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support. The price is fair for the features offered. For us, it is cost-effective compared to hiring a dedicated person for administration.
Project Manager-Cyber/Information Security at Lauren information technologies
Real User
Top 5
Oct 17, 2024
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
It is vital to have the support of a specialized partner. It will help you to really deliver what you are looking for, help with costs, and, if necessary, offer technical support.
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful...
In comparison to other vendors, the pricing is reasonable and affordable.
It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.
All original equipment manufacturers mention zero-day attacks and the exploitation of previously unknown vulnerabilities, and Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) also includes this feature. As a tool, it is good, but I did not observe any extraordinary service from Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) regarding zero-day attack protection. It is a good feature, but I did not find particularly unique characteristics.
Regarding total cost of ownership, I cannot describe this accurately. Concerning the price for Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) and license costs, the pricing is good, and the approach could be better.
The pricing is reasonable, and I believe it is acceptable. I am satisfied with the timing.
Pricing is a little bit high compared to other OEMs, and the setup cost was handled by a partner.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive. It is a little bit expensive. You cannot avoid this from an Israeli product. Israeli products follow a certain pricing model. If they could reduce the cost a bit, then they can compete with Palo Alto. Palo Alto is leading, Cisco is down, and Palo Alto is coming up. There is something peculiar in the market. Cisco for the last three or four quarters has been very down. In fact, last year they made very less profits. However, Palo Alto was somewhere in the cloud. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is also coming up, but not the Palo Alto.
The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF are excellent, and I have no concerns with them.
The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF is straightforward, with the service being available as a fully managed service, and the pricing depending on traffic volume, number of protected applications, and cloud provider. I do not have a problem with this area.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing and licensing seem fair but not the simplest, as the licensing is flexible and subscription-based. While it can feel complex to estimate the upfront cost depending on traffic volume and features enabled, the initial setup cost is straightforward with minimal infrastructure costs, though fine-tuning and integrating took extra time, which adds to the indirect setup cost in terms of experienced resources.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good. The experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is straightforward without any challenges.
I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.
The pricing can be a bit complex to understand initially. It can be challenging to estimate costs, especially when scaling our usage.
Pricing and setup costs are fine. It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors. Additionally, it is less costly than the OEM.
Our experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing was positive. We did not have any issues.
The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others.
As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past. Regarding the reduction of the overall total cost of ownership, I am not deeply involved with cost management. However, feedback from a senior manager indicates that we have made a positive decision.
Pricing and licensing are really expensive for this product. While it provides a very good security level, the price for each service is high. Small organizations might not be able to afford the price.
If the price could come down, I would be very happy with the product.
The setup cost is very simple. It is a really good price considering the functionalities of the product and the price of the license. It is very well-calibrated.
For me, the pricing and licensing is a fair value for what they provide.
I am less knowledgeable with prices because I only define the requirements and look at the execution. I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
It didn't lower the TCO, it actually raised it, in my opinion. It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money. Check Point is cheaper than Radware. It is relatively cheaper for a WAF solution which is something that we liked and made us choose it. It is a bit difficult to know the price differences since everything is always included in a bundle.
The base solution costs approximately 30,000 euros, with an additional 2,000 euros per year for licenses and support. The price is fair for the features offered. For us, it is cost-effective compared to hiring a dedicated person for administration.
Pricing is average—not too expensive, yet not cheap either. CloudGuard offers bundled packages, which may reduce costs compared to paying for individual features as opposed to other providers.
Pricing is a bit high, but it is justified considering the features and support provided by Check Point.
Pricing and licensing modules need to be improved.
It is extremely affordable and high value for cost.
Renewing licenses is relatively simple, though there is room for further streamlining the process.
I'm not sure what the exact pricing is.
I don't really put a value on pricing. We wanted to go for Check Point, found a reseller, and got the solution.
The tool does have a high cost compared to others on the market, yet it has more features.
The setup cost is suitable for SMEs.
It is vital to have the support of a specialized partner. It will help you to really deliver what you are looking for, help with costs, and, if necessary, offer technical support.
It is important to review your requirements with a partner to see which tool can cover them, in addition to validating the cost issue.