GitGuardian Platform and Check Point CloudGuard Code Security both compete in the security domain, each specializing in different aspects of it. GitGuardian appears to have an edge in internal secrets management, offering fast remediation and effective real-time alerts, while Check Point excels in infrastructure risk assessments with strong automation features.
Features: GitGuardian Platform is recognized for its extensive detection capabilities, efficiently identifying and managing secrets. It provides real-time alerts and maintains low false-positive rates, aiding seamless integration with various tools. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security stands out for its automation in security processes and comprehensive code assessments, being part of Check Point's broader security ecosystem. It excels in real-time threat detection, which is crucial for environments with complex infrastructure.
Room for Improvement: GitGuardian users seek better customization options and enhanced integrations, along with simplified historical scanning processes. There is also a call for clearer remediation instructions and the desire for a mobile app. In Check Point CloudGuard Code Security, users face challenges with limited documentation and support, desiring easier third-party tool integrations and improved geolocation handling. Both solutions would benefit from more tailored user experiences and expanded integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitGuardian Platform is praised for its ease of use and excellent customer support, with a responsive technical support team ensuring a positive implementation experience. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security users report less need for direct technical support. However, the complexity and newness of the tool pose challenges, offset by its simple setup once understood.
Pricing and ROI: GitGuardian's pricing is generally viewed as reasonable, providing clear ROI for smaller teams, though larger organizations may find it costly despite its security insights. Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is considered affordable, offering significant ROI through enhanced security postures. The purchasing process is sometimes seen as less straightforward. Both products deliver good ROI in protecting sensitive information, with pricing fairness perceptions varying by organization size and needs.
The majority of our incidents for critical detectors and important secret types are remediated automatically or proactively by developers through GitGuardian's notification system, without security team involvement.
I would rate the support for Check Point CloudGuard Code Security as good because we can quickly email support about any problems we encounter, and they reply instantly to provide help.
I would rate their technical support a nine out of ten.
In terms of scalability, I would rate it around a ten out of ten, as it handles all the repositories and commit activity we have.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Currently, what GitGuardian Platform is doing works effectively.
We also run a self-hosted cluster which has not experienced these issues, though we've faced some challenges upgrading Kubernetes that required support assistance to prevent internal downtime.
We set up a lot of the repository, so GitGuardian is a required check.
All the features we have on the firewall on the on-premises side, we also have under CloudGuard such as IPS, Anti-Bot, and all these blades are set up in our CloudGuard.
We are looking for better metrics and audit data, wanting more features such as knowing which users are creating the most secrets or committing the most secrets, what repository, what directory, and who is not checking in secrets.
This presents an opportunity for them to better showcase their developer-first remediation mindset.
It would be helpful to see which GitHub users have or do not have the pre-push hook capability turned on.
Overall, the secret detection sector is expensive, but we are happy with the value we get.
It's fairly priced, as it performs a lot of analysis and is a valuable tool.
The most valuable features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include our approach to manage it via the management we have on-premises, and we also deploy the same extension management of CloudGuard to manage all the virtual systems on Azure.
A high number of our exposures are remediated by developers before security needs to step in, as the self-healing playbook process engages them automatically.
It is really important to stop our developers from committing secrets into their source code before they hit the remote GitHub servers.
GitGuardian Platform performs the capability to detect secrets in real time exceptionally, as it activates from the commit and can detect it immediately.
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security enhances application and site security in Microsoft Azure, detecting vulnerabilities, preventing breaches, and safeguarding against malicious activities while ensuring compliance and improving code quality.
Check Point CloudGuard Code Security, designed for cloud and on-premise environments, scans applications configurations, detects exposed credentials, and aligns with legal frameworks. It offers simple implementation, centralized management, customizable rules, and improved security practices. It supports multiple clouds, offers real-time data loss prevention, advanced posture management, and remediation guidance. It enhances policy enforcement and provides powerful analytics, intuitive dashboards, and automation for reduced human error and better security.
What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard Code Security?Check Point CloudGuard Code Security is vital in industries where securing cloud and on-premise environments is critical. For instance, in finance, it aids in regulatory compliance and protects sensitive data. Healthcare relies on it for safeguarding patient information, while tech companies use it to protect intellectual property during development. In retail, it enhances security against cyber threats, securing transaction data and customer information.
GitGuardian helps organizations detect and fix vulnerabilities in source code at every step of the software development lifecycle. With GitGuardian’s policy engine, security teams can monitor and enforce rules across their VCS, DevOps tools, and infrastructure-as-code configurations.
Widely adopted by developer communities, GitGuardian is used by more than 500,000 developers and is the #1 app in the security category on the GitHub Marketplace. GitGuardian is also trusted by leading companies, including Instacart, Genesys, Orange, Iress, Beyond Identity, NOW: Pensions, and Stedi.
GitGuardian Platform includes automated secrets detection and remediation. By reducing the risks of secrets exposure across the SDLC, GitGuardian helps software-driven organizations strengthen their security posture and comply with frameworks and standards.
Its detection engine is trained against more than a billion public GitHub commits every year, and it covers 350+ types of secrets such as API keys, database connection strings, private keys, certificates, and more.
GitGuardian brings security and development teams together with automated remediation playbooks and collaboration features to resolve incidents fast and in full. By pulling developers closer to the remediation process, organizations can achieve higher incident closing rates and shorter fix times.
The platform integrates across the DevOps toolchain, including native support for continuously scanning VCS platforms like GitHub, Gitlab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket or CI/CD tools like Jenkins, CircleCI, Travis CI, GitLab pipelines, and many more. It also integrates with ticketing and messaging systems like Splunk, PagerDuty, Jira and Slack to support teams with their incident remediation workflows. GitGuardian is offered as a SaaS platform but can also be hosted on-premise for organizations operating in highly regulated industries or with strict data privacy requirements.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
