Centreon vs ManageEngine Applications Manager comparison

Centreon and ManageEngine are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3, while ManageEngine is ranked #33 with an average rating of 7.0. Centreon holds a 2.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
4,870 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Applications M...

Read 18 ManageEngine Applications Manager reviews

3,929 Views
1,572 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Centreon

ManageEngine Applications M...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

ManageEngine Applications Manager and Centreon compete in IT infrastructure management. Centreon has an advantage in feature robustness, while ManageEngine is superior in cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: ManageEngine Applications Manager monitors applications across physical, virtual, and cloud environments, providing deep insights into performance issues and enabling monitoring of SQL jobs and Kubernetes. Centreon excels in network monitoring, offers highly customizable alerts, and includes data visualization features for comprehensive infrastructure visibility.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine could enhance its network monitoring capabilities and offer more extensive integration options with third-party systems. Documentation clarity would also benefit. Centreon's deployment process can be simplified, its user interface improved for easier navigation, and reporting features could be more user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine offers a straightforward installation process supported by effective customer service and regular updates. Centreon's deployment is complex but compensated for by strong community support and extensive guidance for configuration. ManageEngine provides a smoother startup experience, while Centreon offers more detailed guidance for intricate setups.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine is cost-competitive, providing scalable solutions with a substantial ROI suitable for a broad audience. Centreon requires a higher initial investment but justifies this with sophisticated features, offering good ROI for large network environments. ManageEngine's pricing structure attracts a wider audience, whereas Centreon appeals to those seeking advanced capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

ManageEngine Applications M...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

33rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (46th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.3%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine Applications Manager is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	2.3%
ManageEngine Applications Manager	0.9%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Srinivasan Naidu

Senior System Engineer at Qatar Petroleum

Managing application health has become simpler but new monitoring features still need faster delivery

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health What I like about ManageEngine Applications Manager is the ease of use and ease of deployment. I cannot remember anything specific for future updates of the product. The new features take a lot of time…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"If they have the same issues that we had, which means a lot of pollers spread across the whole infrastructure and no central view to look at the entire status with the need to manage everything together, then it is a good solution."

"Centreon helps me detect where the problem is quickly. When we resolve a problem quickly, this lowers our overall costs."

"We picked Centreon because, after an open-source comparison, and given what we want to do, and our skills and experience as well, it was the best solution for us, the most reliable for our services."

"Centreon's most valuable feature is Opsgenie."

"During the day it probably saves us 50 percent of our time, and during the night it's even more."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that most of its plug-ins are free."

More Centreon pros

"We do not have pricing constraints as an organization, because we do have reservations about ManageEngine being functionally scalable."

"The features on the dashboard of ManageEngine Application Manager are much better than these other solutions, and I found that those solutions can be quite costly in comparison."

"If cost is your consideration and you have a well-rounded system administrator, this is a good product to explore."

"ITSM is a valuable feature, it complies with the requirements in Pakistan."

"The initial setup was straightforward, without complexity."

"I used it extensively for a year, and prior to that, I was very comfortable."

"Its price and the flexibility to deploy are the most valuable. Flexibility is very important, and you can scale from very basic to more complex. This solution is a part of a complete suite of management tools. So, it can be integrated with other solutions for monitoring networks, which is very important. You can expand it or interconnect it with many other tools, which is a powerful feature. We have a very good and long relationship with ManageEngine support guys. They provide very good support for us."

"For a small organization, I think ManageEngine is pretty nice, I think it's enough."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pros

Cons

"The pricing setup costs and licensing weren't very good in the past."

"I would like to see an improvement of the communication with big data systems, because Centreon is a monitoring system. In our point of view, Centreon should be a part of a source for a big data system, not a big data system itself. So, it should be easier to add data from the Centreon system to a big data system. For example, it should be able to teach machine learning."

"I would like to see a better UI, one which is more responsive."

"The reporting has room for improvement."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"The Home view could be improved by adding customization functions that allow users to change the size of the widgets for a more uniform layout."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"Where Centreon is weaker is that the initial deployment could be easier."

More Centreon cons

"I would say that the implementation of ManageEngine Applications Manager is too detailed. You need some training to effectually use it."

"Even with the top-notch dashboard, it could be made stronger in order to have an additional plug-in for analytics."

"The integration process with third party tools poses some challenges; enhancing the robustness of these integrations could greatly improve overall functionality and user experience."

"I would like the solution to improve the ability to track services."

"They can improve the post-processing of the data. AppDynamics has more powerful tools for post-processing or analytics. It has some limitations in more complex environments, but because we are free to use different solutions, we try to find what is best for the customers or the problem we are trying to solve."

"The dashboards in the interface need a lot of work."

"One area of improvement is the dashboard should be more readable and available."

"I assess the impact of real-user monitoring of this product on my application's performance as not good. I am not satisfied with monitoring."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

"It's quite expensive when you use the Enterprise version, but if you compare it to other providers, it's more like a middle-of-the-line product. It's always good to have a price that is lower, but I would say the price is okay because we get very good support and if we have any other issues we can always contact them. There has never been a time when I didn't get help from them."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"ManageEngine Applications Manager has reasonable pricing. It's more affordable than other solutions in the market. My company has an instance-based license for ManageEngine Applications Manager. You can purchase a yearly subscription or a perpetual license. The standard license covers most features, but you can still have some paid add-ons."

"Its price is good."

"The solution is noted for its cost-effectiveness, a crucial consideration for potential users."

"The licensing costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager are around $1,200 per year. For additional monitors, you have to pay extra."

"It is a cost-effective solution."

"The solution's licensing costs are yearly."

"The annual licensing depends on the number of monitors you have connected. Once you get to two hundred monitors you can see the price reflect."

"Price-wise, it is a cheap tool...The solution's licensing model is subscription-based, in which yearly payments are to be made."

More ManageEngine Applications Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I am satisfied with the licensing cost for ManageEngine Applications Manager.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Applications Manager?

The new features take a lot of time to be implemented, and that could be improved about ManageEngine Applications Manager. If I were requesting a new feature that is not existing, making it availab...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Applications Manager?

I use application discovery and dependency mapping. It helps with managing application health.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Azure Monitor vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 9% of the time

SCOM vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Dynatrace vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Applications Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Applications Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Applications Manager

August 2026

ManageEngine Applications Manager report

Download ManageEngine Applications Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Applications Manager

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

ManageEngine Applications Manager offers an intuitive dashboard that combines flexibility and affordability for comprehensive IT monitoring. Supporting over 80 applications and servers, it provides agentless monitoring and seamless integration with other management tools.

ManageEngine Applications Manager stands out with its ability to monitor applications, servers, databases, and IT infrastructures, making it ideal for small to medium businesses seeking a scalable and cost-effective solution. Users benefit from customizable Service Level Management rules, effective Kubernetes monitoring, and frequent software updates. However, there is room for enhancement in agent stability under heavy load conditions, overall scalability, deeper data analysis capabilities, and user experience improvements. Organizations leverage it for application performance monitoring, IT infrastructure management, and service management, incorporating it for application modernization, JVM parameter analysis, and automatic alarm settings. It also facilitates application discovery, dependency mapping, troubleshooting, and cloud service evaluation.

What are the key features of ManageEngine Applications Manager?

Easy-to-Use Dashboard: Offers a user-friendly interface for efficient monitoring.
Comprehensive IT Monitoring: Supports over 80 applications and servers.
Agentless Monitoring: Enables seamless deployment and integration.
Service Level Management: Provides customizable rules to manage services effectively.
Kubernetes Monitoring: Efficiently tracks and manages Kubernetes environments.
Regular Updates: Ensures the software stays up-to-date with new features.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Cost-Effective: Provides a scalable solution suitable for small to medium businesses.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with other management tools.
Customizable Solutions: Offers flexibility to tailor monitoring according to specific business needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Comes with helpful resources for better understanding.

ManageEngine Applications Manager is implemented across various industries for monitoring SQL databases, service incidents, and IT service management. It supports application discovery and troubleshooting, enhancing management of IT services and asset modules. Companies also use it to evaluate potential cloud service options.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Certis Europe, Financial Domain, SaaS Office Suite, On Demand TV, Parliament's IT Systems, Sastra Technologies, UniServity

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.