CA App Synthetic Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Broadcom and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #68, while SolarWinds is ranked #64. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

778 Views
762 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

984 Views
886 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

CA App Synthetic Monitor and SolarWinds Pingdom are two leading tools for synthetic monitoring. Users seem to prefer SolarWinds Pingdom for its advanced features, while CA App Synthetic Monitor receives positive feedback for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features:CA App Synthetic Monitor stands out for its real-time performance monitoring, intuitive setup, and affordability. SolarWinds Pingdom is highly appreciated for its comprehensive monitoring solutions, including uptime, transaction monitoring, and versatile features.

Room for Improvement:Users indicate that CA App Synthetic Monitor could benefit from improved customization options, better reporting capabilities, and more detailed alerts. SolarWinds Pingdom could address user concerns by enhancing alerting systems, offering more competitive pricing, and improving customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:CA App Synthetic Monitor is commended for its quick and straightforward deployment with reliable support. SolarWinds Pingdom also offers a streamlined deployment process but receives mixed reviews regarding customer service responsiveness. While both provide easy deployment, CA App Synthetic Monitor is noted for better support consistency.

Pricing and ROI:CA App Synthetic Monitor offers a more affordable initial setup and delivers satisfactory ROI according to user feedback. SolarWinds Pingdom, although pricier, is perceived as offering significant value due to its extensive features. Users acknowledge the higher cost of Pingdom but feel the ROI justifies the expenditure.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

68th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

64th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SolarWinds Pingdom	0.5%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.5%
Other	99.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"My advice to anybody who is considering Pingdom is that this is a good product at an affordable price."

"Overall, this is a very good product and one that I recommend."

"One valuable feature is real user monitoring."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

Cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

Splunk AppDynamics vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Stackify vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 13% of the time

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 12% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 11% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 8% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

No data available

Overview

IT organizations require full visibility into business-critical applications regardless of where they're hosted in order to maintain service levels and proactively deal with issues before the end-user is impacted. CA App Synthetic Monitor uses synthetic transactions to provide performance insight for these applications no matter where they're hosted: outside the firewall, in the cloud or delivered via a managed service provider (MSP). Delivered as software as a service, CA App Synthetic Monitor provides end-to-end transaction response time visibility into cloud, mobile and traditional web applications using synthetic transactions delivered by a network of 95 monitoring stations across six continents, 48 countries, 93 cities and 15 time zones.

Broadcom

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

March 2026

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.