Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Microsoft and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8, while SolarWinds is ranked #57. Microsoft holds a 6.3% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

13,387 Views
12,584 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

603 Views
555 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

SolarWinds Pingdom and Azure Monitor are popular monitoring solutions with different strengths. SolarWinds Pingdom is preferred for its straightforward setup process, while Azure Monitor impresses users with its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: SolarWinds Pingdom users highlight valuable features such as REST API access, detailed uptime reports, and ease of alert configuration. Azure Monitor stands out with its broad cloud-native support, advanced analytics, and seamless integration with Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that SolarWinds Pingdom could improve its feature set to cover more advanced monitoring capabilities and better scalability options. For Azure Monitor, user reviews indicate a need for simplifying its setup and offering more intuitive configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds Pingdom is praised for its quick deployment and accessible customer support. Azure Monitor, though perceived as more complex to deploy, offers extensive support and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds Pingdom is appreciated for its affordable setup costs and clear ROI metrics, making it attractive for smaller enterprises. Azure Monitor, despite higher initial costs, is seen as a valuable investment due to its comprehensive features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

57th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.3%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

"The solution works well overall. It's easy to implement and simple to use."

"I use the solution to monitor the infrastructure and applications."

"The most valuable feature is the universality of their functionalities in all Azure services, including, software solutions."

"I am impressed by the reporting on the average eight ports that we get from this solution."

"Good load and metrics gathering and very good analysis."

"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."

"For me, the best feature is the log analysis with Azure Monitor's Log Analytics. Without being able to analyze the logs of all the activities that affect the performance of a machine, your monitoring effectiveness will be severely limited."

More Azure Monitor pros

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

Cons

"If I contact the First Line Support, they seem disconnected and lack technical information."

"I believe Azure Monitor is already a top-notch solution with excellent functionality and there is not much I would suggest for improvement. However, there is one limitation that certain features require payment, even for testing purposes, which can be a challenge."

"Integration with third-party tools from other vendors than Azure is more time-consuming"

"No improvements are needed from my perspective."

"Azure Monitor's integration with applications could be improved."

"There are a lot of things that take more time to do, such as charting, alerting, and correlation of data, and things like that. Azure Monitor doesn't tell you why something happened. It just tells you that it happened. It should also have some type of AI. Environments and applications are becoming more and more complex every day with hundreds or thousands of microservices. Therefore, having to do a lot of the stuff manually takes a lot of time, and on top of that, troubleshooting issues takes a lot of time. The traditional method of troubleshooting doesn't really work for or apply to this environment we're in. So, having an AI-based system and the ability to automate deployments of your monitoring and configurations makes it much easier."

"It might not have all of the capabilities we will need."

"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."

More Azure Monitor cons

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is very good. I could say that Microsoft offers different cost models, which are listed on the product's website."

"It is a pay-as-you-go model. I find it very cost-effective."

"The solution is a pay-as-you-go consumption service and is the least expensive in the market."

"The product offers a pay-as-you-go model to users. The charges are to be paid according to the usage of the product."

"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."

"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."

"The tool is expensive."

"My company is okay with the current pricing of the solution."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 21% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 18% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 17% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 14% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

July 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.