Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

Microsoft and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6, while SolarWinds is ranked #61. Microsoft holds a 5.1% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

11,908 Views
11,313 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

604 Views
556 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

SolarWinds Pingdom and Azure Monitor are popular monitoring solutions with different strengths. SolarWinds Pingdom is preferred for its straightforward setup process, while Azure Monitor impresses users with its advanced features and integration capabilities.

Features: SolarWinds Pingdom users highlight valuable features such as REST API access, detailed uptime reports, and ease of alert configuration. Azure Monitor stands out with its broad cloud-native support, advanced analytics, and seamless integration with Azure services.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that SolarWinds Pingdom could improve its feature set to cover more advanced monitoring capabilities and better scalability options. For Azure Monitor, user reviews indicate a need for simplifying its setup and offering more intuitive configuration options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SolarWinds Pingdom is praised for its quick deployment and accessible customer support. Azure Monitor, though perceived as more complex to deploy, offers extensive support and documentation.

Pricing and ROI: SolarWinds Pingdom is appreciated for its affordable setup costs and clear ROI metrics, making it attractive for smaller enterprises. Azure Monitor, despite higher initial costs, is seen as a valuable investment due to its comprehensive features and long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

5th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

61st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 5.1%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Monitor	5.1%
SolarWinds Pingdom	0.3%
Other	94.6%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Azure Monitor is that it performs well."

"The solution very easily integrates with Azure services and in one click you can monitor your resource."

"The overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ease of use and support for multiple environments"

"Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment."

"The most valuable feature is that it ensures our servers are up."

More Azure Monitor pros

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

Cons

"The troubleshooting logs need improvement. There should be some improvement there. I have a hard time finding the right logs at the right times whenever there is an issue occurring."

"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."

"The product should integrate well with other tools or clouds in the future, as it is one of the areas where the product currently has certain shortcomings."

"Azure Monitor could improve the visualization aspect and integrate better with other third-party services."

"n comparison to New Relic, which I've used before, it's a bit more complicated. It's not as easy to use. It also took some time to get it working. The implementation needs to be simpler."

"They should include advanced logging on the database level in the Azure pool."

"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."

"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."

More Azure Monitor cons

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Azure Monitor is one of the more cost effective solutions on the market."

"It's a costly solution"

"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

"Regarding pricing, Azure Monitor is free with Azure license, so there are no additional costs for using it."

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."

"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Educational Organization

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 21% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Grafana vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 20% of the time

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 19% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 17% of the time

Catchpoint vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 16% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

September 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

September 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.