CA App Synthetic Monitor vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Broadcom and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Broadcom is ranked #73, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. Broadcom holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Read 3 CA App Synthetic Monitor reviews

1,518 Views
1,503 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 274 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

32,356 Views
24,591 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 1, 2026

Splunk AppDynamics and CA App Synthetic Monitor are competitors in the application performance monitoring sector. CA App Synthetic Monitor emerges as the favored choice for its straightforward implementation and effective testing capabilities.

Features: Splunk AppDynamics provides dynamic application mapping, real-time business metrics, and advanced analytics, making it adept for intricate enterprise settings. CA App Synthetic Monitor is notable for its seamless synthetic transaction monitoring, the ability to simulate complete user experiences, and user-friendly synthetic monitoring.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics offers flexible deployment options with comprehensive support throughout installation and configuration stages, particularly suited for larger organizations. CA App Synthetic Monitor presents a simple deployment model, favored by businesses needing quick operational capabilities, and is preferred for its ease by smaller teams with limited technical experience.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher initial costs but ensures substantial ROI with its extensive monitoring features aiding critical decisions. CA App Synthetic Monitor, requiring a lower initial investment, offers cost-effective monitoring, appealing for businesses emphasizing cost efficiency and rapid ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,701 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CA App Synthetic Monitor

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

73rd

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

274

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of CA App Synthetic Monitor is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 4.5%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	4.5%
CA App Synthetic Monitor	0.5%
Other	95.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

reviewer2286675

System Administrator at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

A reliable solution for SSL offloading and to encrypt outside traffic

If you are responsible for monitoring the logs in F5, it isn't very easy. The format is complicated compared to different vendors. For example, Fortinet and Cisco have feasible formats for sending and fetching logs. Suppose I'm monitoring the logs and everything, and when I am retrieving logs from F5, I want to know whether it is regular traffic or any abnormality is happening. The logs itself is not user-friendly. It may not give you a clear way of what's happening. You have to go through different websites and work on it. You have to waste so much time on it.

Read full review

Shamim Alsharif

Performance Test Engineer at TANIM CONSULTING, LLC

Real-time monitoring has improved our banking API performance and supports detailed business transaction analysis

The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related. It's real-time monitoring of performance of each of the components, which is what we need and use all the time. It's highly effective, I would say. Infrastructure visibility, transaction monitoring, to check the actual user experience in terms of the response time, MRT and all those things. We do the component monitoring like the API performance and the connections and all those things, but we also do the business process monitoring and business transaction monitoring.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Each had strengths in one area or another, but CA covered the majority of our needs end-to-end."

"From our experience, it really helps managers in measuring application SLAs and viewing historical performance data."

"It improves our organization by providing the right alerts, and there are so many parameters to choose from that it allows us to set the right level of alerting mechanism for approximately one hundred and twenty services."

"Using AppDynamics, we have been able to monitor what is happening using fantastic metrics that it provides."

"We switched to AppDynamics for its capabilities."

"Splunk AppDynamics' infrastructure monitoring is satisfactory."

"I rate Splunk AppDynamics 10 out of 10."

"The real-time monitoring is what we can see for anything that is needed in terms of CPU, memory, or the connections or the sessions related, and it's highly effective because we use it all the time to monitor both component performance and business transactions to check the actual user experience in terms of response time."

"APM tool provides comprehensive information about several elements like performance, errors, and resources."

"Splunk AppDynamics tells us what the top 10 queries are which are actually contributing to the load on the database, and it gives us the view of what exactly the query does, whether it uses more DB CPU or is contributing to the roll-up contention on the database."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"Pricing makes little sense. We had examples where it would be cheaper to have two basic accounts than one intermediate."

"The RBMS component is limited as you can only record using Internet Explorer."

"The GUI can be overwhelming at first to a novice Dev or Ops support person, and the possible root causes of an issue do not bubble up to the first screen you see."

"Customer support takes time. Whenever we face any issues, we have to open the vendor case and then there will be back and forth happening."

"Customer support from Splunk AppDynamics is fair but requires enhancements in ticket resolution times."

"What could be improved in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is for the synthetic jobs or synthetic agents, in particular, you can't do a lot of tests with just one agent. You have to install a lot of agents if you want to do more tests, so this is an area for improvement in the solution. Another area for improvement in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is that you're only able to see basic metrics in the absence of server or database visibility. For the SaaS version of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring, my team just downloaded then installed the extension in an application in Azure to see the application on the controller, so if this can be done in the on-premise version of the solution as well, without needing to install the agent on the machine, then it would make AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring better. Currently, the .NET agent consumes the CPU or memory and clients usually raise this issue with my team, so it would be good if the on-premises version doesn't require agent installation on the machine. Another functionality I'd like to see in the next release of AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is for it to receive updates from the file config without needing to reset IIS because right now when you do a modification in IIS, you have to restart IIS. When you add a service to the agent config, you have to restart IIS. For the product server, it's not possible to reset IIS after you make changes to the config file, so if this could be improved, then it would make AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring a better solution."

"Analytics SQL statement monitoring"

"One thing for which we didn't get a clear answer is how taxing or how much overhead it can create on a database."

"Application Analytics' performance in pure and native cloud environments could be improved."

"There are many KPIs that are not available in AppDynamics."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I would like more flexible pricing: A pay-per-use model, rather than just a fixed-price model."

"AppDynamics is really pricey as it requires licenses for every feature."

"My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."

"As a technical person, and as an application development team, they all understand that this is the right tool for us. But when it comes to budget and financial matters, it takes days and weeks to convince upper management to buy this tool. So they should do something more on licensing costs."

"This solution is not the cheapest but it works well. You will end up doing more work with a cheaper solution than if you just spent the extra money on a better solution like this one."

"Pricing is based on the size of the deployment."

"I rate AppDynamics Mobile Real-User Monitoring's pricing as seven out of ten. Mobile monitoring is paid based on the number of instances utilizing the mobile monitoring service, which increases as the scale grows. Consequently, your mobile user count can proportionally surpass all other applications."

"AppDynamics does not usually do monthly payments. They do it on an annual basis, at the very least."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

22%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	64
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	205

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

The price is not cheap, however, considering the benefits and the price ratio, I would rate it nine out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AppDynamics Database Monitoring?

Based on my experience, some databases like Couchbase, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB require a little bit of enhancement as they are newer and not as widely used as other databases. The limitations are o...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText SiteScope vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

Stackify vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

IDERA Precise vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

LogicMonitor vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Snyk vs CA App Synthetic Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

More CA App Synthetic Monitor Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

BMC TrueSight vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2026

Download CA App Synthetic Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

July 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

CA ASM

No data available

Overview

CA App Synthetic Monitor provides proactive monitoring of web applications and services to ensure performance and availability. It allows businesses to identify and resolve problems before they impact users.

By simulating user interactions and analyzing application performance, CA App Synthetic Monitor enables businesses to maintain optimal service levels. This cloud-based solution offers a comprehensive view of application health through real-time monitoring and alerts, facilitating quick identification of performance bottlenecks and outages. It helps IT teams enhance user experience by predicting potential issues and optimizing resource allocation. Its flexibility and scalability cater to a range of business needs.

What are key features of CA App Synthetic Monitor?

Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring of web applications to detect issues quickly.
Global Reach: Simulate user transactions from multiple locations worldwide.
Custom Alerts: Set up customized alerts for specific performance thresholds.
Detailed Reporting: Access in-depth analysis of application performance metrics.
Scalability: Easily scalable to match growing business demands.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Improved User Experience: By identifying issues early, end-users encounter fewer disruptions.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces downtime-related costs through early detection and resolution.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures application reliability and reduces service outages.
Time Saving: Automates performance checks to save time for IT teams.

Industries such as e-commerce, finance, and IT services implement CA App Synthetic Monitor to ensure their software systems remain performant under various conditions. For e-commerce, it assures checkout processes run smoothly. Financial sectors use it to guarantee secure and reliable transaction handling. IT services leverage its capabilities to maintain service level agreements, ensuring customer satisfaction in digital interactions.

Broadcom

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Lexmark

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics

August 2026

Free Report: CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,701 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CA App Synthetic Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.