BrowserStack vs Qt Squish comparison

"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"Maintenance of the solution is easy."

"The most valuable feature is the variety the solution offers around the different types of devices, especially mobile devices."

"The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"I can perform Java SWT."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"It is very stable."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."

"I would like to see clearer visibility."

"BrowserStack is scalable, but cost is significant for those living in Mexico."

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

"We had some execution issues."

"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."

"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"You need to set up some special environment variables."

"Support isn't always helpful. I sometimes need to find solutions myself."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"The price could be better."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"The price is fine."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."