No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 28.6%, down from 36.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 26.2%, up from 17.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 12.1%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization28.6%
Parasoft Virtualize26.2%
ReadyAPI Virtualization12.1%
Other33.10000000000001%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.
Venkata Yedida - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Good RESTful API support and performs well, but customization is difficult and time-consuming
My advice for anyone who is considering this product is that it is mainly for RESTful calls. If somebody is using Swagger APIs or some RESTful calls as part of the specification that they want to virtualize, then this tool can be a good choice. Also, if they want to virtualize a GUI tool, then it is good. In general, this is a good product but I think that the user experience has to be improved. There's just a lot of manual work that has to be done with scripting. This should be reduced to make it a more seamless experience for the user. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CA technical support and DevTest community people love to respond and come up with a number of suggestions, which is really appreciated."
"Over the past 3 years which I've been using it, I've found it to be a good solution."
"Yes, I have used similar solutions from two other vendors but love the UI, and ease of use of CA Service Virtualization."
"It is definitely scalable."
"Over about a year, we have saved over half a million for our customer."
"This product helps us to simulate broken or nonexistent systems, avoid latency between projects, and perform load-bearing testing on unavailable external systems."
"We had a number of back-end services that were not available during testing times. What this had allowed us to do is get our early life testing done while those services are not available."
"Think “outside the box” when you think about how this product can be used."
"The technical support is very good, with short lines and short response times from well-skilled technical employees."
"The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far."
"We decided to use the Parasoft solution because it's more powerful and very easy to use."
"Parasoft's product is easier to operate, and drives the user to make the right decisions and complete the work efficiently."
"Parasoft Virtualization allowed us to create a simulated environment and test the code before entering the testing cycle."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
"Parasoft Virtualize helped us in accelerating application delivery by allowing us to test early."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"ServiceV Pro enabled our organization to deliver an end-to-end solution by virtualizing external systems, which was easy to implement and provided for a lot of flexibility."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"Very good for the price point and compared to more expensive or custom development solutions."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"Features, such as using Groovy scripts for generating dynamic response, which read data out of Excel sheets and one-click deployment are really nice."
 

Cons

"IMS services in version 7.5.2 are quite unstable."
"There is need to improve the DevTest Workstation with UI-based testing features."
"​From a reporting perspective I think we would like to have a more user-friendly approach."
"I would rate customer service from CA to be very low AFTER you have purchased the software."
"I'd like to see more of the newer technologies included in there, looking mainly from a mobile perspective, possibly, so you can virtualize some of the aspects that we're going to be doing for mobile testing."
"VSE Console should be more user friendly."
"CA SV takes up lot of your system resources."
"The concept of agent installation is a tedious process and should have been much simpler."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
"It should have more fine-grained authorization."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"An area of improvements would be Data Repository, as in current stage it is difficult to manage data from this aspect."
"JMS Queue Monitoring: When deploying the TIBCO JMS monitor, we saw an approximately 50% failure rate in detecting the desired event."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
"It is somewhat complex regarding its configuration setup with different technologies."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements"
"This solution has few features for customization."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"The effort required to utilize the capabilities/usage of ServiceV Pro looks like the one area where we could have some further improvements made just to minimize the time required by a developer to use all the products collaboratively (SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro)."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
Information not available
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
"This product is worth the cost."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Marketing Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Construction Company
8%
No data available
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: March 2026.
885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.