No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Parasoft Virtualize vs ReadyAPI Virtualization comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Service Virtualization category, the mindshare of Broadcom Service Virtualization is 27.7%, down from 35.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft Virtualize is 26.0%, up from 17.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Virtualization is 11.3%, down from 12.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Service Virtualization Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Broadcom Service Virtualization27.7%
Parasoft Virtualize26.0%
ReadyAPI Virtualization11.3%
Other35.0%
Service Virtualization
 

Featured Reviews

DM
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Can be used for the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance
We use it for the virtualization of third-party APIs for performance testing. Our second use case is related to the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, which is used for insurance clients In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party…
SP
Solutions Architect at InfoStretch
Easy to set up and scale but needs more data virtualization capabilities
I'm working with a service organization and I'm working for a client and that client requires this solution. That's why we use it. Basically, we are just a customer and end-user. The solution is easy to set up and a good tool for the service virtualization so far. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten. If the product could do more things, I'd give it higher marks.
Ravi Raushan Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer at ValueMomentum
Virtual services have accelerated parallel API testing and have improved complex integration coverage
ReadyAPI Virtualization is especially useful in CI/CD and parallel development workflows because teams can test independently without blocking each other. It also helps simulate edge cases and failure scenarios more safely, improving overall test coverage and system availability before production release. The best features of ReadyAPI Virtualization include services mocking and simulations of complex API behaviors along with integrations with automated testing workflows. I especially value the ability to simulate unavailable or third-party services and create realistic response scenarios and test failure conditions, such as delays or errors, which is very helpful as virtualization integrates well with API functional testing, helping improve development speeds and test coverage. I find the environment flexibility and reusable virtual services very valuable in ReadyAPI Virtualization, as they make it easier for multiple teams to test in parallel and reduce dependency on shared staging systems, improving overall development efficiency. ReadyAPI Virtualization positively impacts my organization by reducing development and testing delays through the removal of dependencies on unavailable or incomplete services, improving parallel development, increasing test coverage, and allowing teams to identify integration issues earlier, which speeds up delivery cycles and enhances overall system reliability before production release. As a result of using ReadyAPI Virtualization, I see faster integration testing and reduced waiting time for dependent services, which significantly improves delivery speed. It also reduces environment-related blockers and catches integration issues earlier, leading to fewer bugs reaching later testing stages or production. Additionally, automated and parallel testing workflows reduce manual effort for QA and development teams.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"You can create virtual services from a live recording or convert raw traffic into request/response pairs."
"We have had developers produce code later than we wanted to, but we've had some other stuff that was dependent on that. So what we were able to do was virtualize these assets and then go forward with our developer and not have to wait for these additional services to be available."
"It gives us the ability to simulate and virtualize components that we don’t currently have."
"CA technical support and DevTest community people love to respond and come up with a number of suggestions, which is really appreciated."
"Very easy to create virtual services for test, Dev and training environments."
"It is easy to use, has a faster time to market, and provides flexibility."
"Service virtualization is the most valuable feature because we can create end-to-end services without actual hardware, so that saves a lot of cost and money."
"The other thing is, it's got probably the greatest amount of features, in terms of different technologies that you can automate and virtualize, out of any of the solutions out there."
"Service Virtualization has provided a way to move forward where we do not find any way to go."
"Parasoft's product is easier to operate, and drives the user to make the right decisions and complete the work efficiently."
"Parasoft Virtualize helped us in accelerating application delivery by allowing us to test early."
"We decided to use the Parasoft solution because it's more powerful and very easy to use."
"Easy testing environment creation. No need to have deep development/infrastructure knowledge."
"Using Virtualize, this dependency has been removed completely, allowing the test team to provision many more orders in shorter time, enabling them to test much more, much faster."
"We now have the ability to test our complex applications completely detached from integration middleware, which improves the reliability, speed, cost, and simplicity of testing."
"The initial setup is quite easy to manage."
"In times of DevOps, where continuous delivery and deployment is progressing at such a fast pace, ServiceV Pro has emerged as an add-on for enhancing our API product finish."
"So far expected result has been beneficial to the our environment and system."
"The technical support is good."
"ServiceV Pro functionality helps in achieving better results in terms of performance and execution of APIs, which definitely results in reaching high-level standards, therefore, getting appreciation from the stakeholders as well."
"Our testing process time was reduced by 30%."
"Ties-in with the rest of the SoapUI platform and its ability to record traffic and create a virtual endpoint."
"It only takes a few minutes to get up and running with virtual services and RESTful calls."
"The solution is very easy to use."
 

Cons

"They still need to improve the reporting functionality for better customization."
"Parsers, look and feel need improvement."
"The things that we're interested mostly are deployment kinds of capability."
"We had to implement an external service catalog. We put it in ServiceNow. I would like to see an integrated service catalog."
"Sometimes we need to develop in web services custom behaviors that simulate technically and functionally the real service."
"Technical documentation needs some more improvements by explaining live scenarios."
"The REST test step could include other methods."
"One major feature I would like to see is on the user administration part."
"This product is too expensive when scaling."
"An area of improvements would be Data Repository, as in current stage it is difficult to manage data from this aspect."
"Only about the memory, if you don't meet the minimum RAM required, performance is not stable."
"JMS Queue Monitoring: When deploying the TIBCO JMS monitor, we saw an approximately 50% failure rate in detecting the desired event."
"When Virtualize is running on a (virtual) machine with limited memory, over time it might consume more and more memory and (worst case) stall."
"Performance enhancement for large payloads."
"It should have more fine-grained authorization."
"It would be ideal if the product offered more in terms of data virtualization or have a separate product that could be combined with this one that could offer a bit more in order to cover more of our requirements."
"Greater capacity to create Virtual APIs based on HAR files or wireshark recordings."
"Requires more documentation or videos with examples, which is easily understood by the new users."
"The solution does not allow you to export APIs to the cURL command like Postman."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present."
"This solution has few features for customization."
"It needs support for a wider set of protocols."
"ReadyAPI Virtualization could enhance usability and performance for large-scale enterprise environments."
"ServiceV still has some bug in the tools, such as structure of the project, integration, and combination with different tools present in the same tools, like SoapUI NG and LoadUI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
"I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
"I think the pricing is quite fair because this solution provides a lot of functionalities, and is quite stable."
"There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
Information not available
"This product is worth the cost."
"Ability to have general IT staff enable developers using this software as opposed to more expensive vendors or developers building their own solution."
"Be updated with the latest offerings that the tool provides so as to avoid any clashes with issues, like licensing."
"Pricing is alright, however more options would be desirable for a fairly new product like ServiceV."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
896,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Wholesaler/Distributor
8%
Computer Software Company
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise98
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise4
 

Also Known As

ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
Parasoft Service Virtualization
ServiceV Pro
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
Alaska Airlines, Cox Automotive, Comcast, Lufthansa, Samsung, WoodmenLife, Caesars Entertainment, Capital One, REI
Zurich Insurance Group
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Tricentis, Parasoft and others in Service Virtualization. Updated: May 2026.
896,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.