Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
2,246 views|1,564 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,970 views|2,803 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations.""It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user.""The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool.""Low-code development is the most valuable feature.""This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently.""The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development.""The platform is user-friendly.""The product's integration features are quite rich and low code. It is easy to use."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pros →

"The product has efficient connectors.""The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.""I would rate my experience with the initial setup a nine out of ten, with ten being easy to set up.""The product's most valuable feature is scalability.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good.""The product’s most valuable feature is integration.""The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful.""I am impressed with the tool's UI and analytics."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"The product's UI could be more convenient.""Have to create some of our own pre-built connectors.""The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc.""In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology.""There are still some areas that need improvement. For example, when updates are going on, the product becomes very slow.""The product could be a little bit more user-friendly.""In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."

More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Cons →

"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications.""There could be more AI features included in the product.""It can be a bit challenging to use.""The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services.""The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure.""Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement.""The main issue is performance, especially when dealing with large amounts of data. Performance-wise, that's the only thing Microsoft should focus on.""The solution lacks sufficient connectors."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."
  • "They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."
  • "The licensing model of Dell Boomi is based on a ‘pay-per-use’ model."
  • "This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."
  • "The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."
  • "When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"
  • "The cost of the solution is in the neighborhood of $20,000 annually. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee."
  • "Approximately 20k annually."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I have worked as an Integration Architect/Developer for many years and have used Mulesoft, Boomi, Informatica, Workato, Celigo, SSIS and many other integration tools.  The tool you would pick depends… more »
    Top Answer:Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle. I don't know the exact price of the product.
    Top Answer:The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.
    Top Answer:Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where ten points mean… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,246
    Comparisons
    1,564
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    394
    Rating
    7.4
    Views
    5,970
    Comparisons
    2,803
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Boomi AtomSphere integration platform as a service (iPaaS) supports all your application integration processes – between cloud platforms, software-as-a-service applications, and on-premises systems. Your entire team has online access to a powerful range of integration and data management capabilities, that can be realized in a fraction of the time of legacy middleware technologies.

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    DocuSign Inc., Innotas, Certent, Renesas Electronics America (REA), Kelly-Moore Paints, Mindjet, City of McKinney, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers (RBA), Daylight Transport, A10 Networks
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Outsourcing Company8%
    Retailer8%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Retailer6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company46%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    Marketing Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 26 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Provides Integration Service Environment (ISE) for content-based routing, data transformation, and enrichment, enhancing integration capabilities". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and AWS Glue, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform, Workato and webMethods.io Integration. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps report.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.