We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and webMethods.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."Logic Apps is valuable because my team uses it for integrating SaaS tool sets."
"Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."
"It's quite similar to Power Optima, but I use it mainly to integrate with databases, and it works well for that purpose."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"We mainly used it to integrate SAP, ServiceNow, and different third-party APIs with the front end."
"EDI is robust and integration with SAP is good."
"The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation."
"Especially when using a function or a parameter, that could be easier as that's not very well-documented, and it's not very clear from the tool itself how to use it."
"We wanted to use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, but we faced a timeout."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"The stability of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is stable. However, we have had some issues in the past. They do resolve issues that arise from new releases."
"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."
"The support I have received is mixed because in some cases they are accurate, and in others, it was me doing the groundwork and giving feedback for the agent to finally tell me there is an issue in their larger services."
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors."
"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."
"Scalability and connectors to different cloud applications is lacking."
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 31 reviews while webMethods.io is ranked 18th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 2 reviews. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Has different connectors for workflow and comes with low-code feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io writes "Comes with strong and powerful BPM ". Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi iPaaS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and Workato, whereas webMethods.io is most compared with webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
