Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs webMethods.io comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 15.3% mindshare in PaaS, compared to IBM’s 8.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Read 39 Microsoft Azure Logic Apps reviews

3,452 Views
1,405 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 92 webMethods.io reviews

1,867 Views
649 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

webMethods.io and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are both prominent players in the integration platform as a service (iPaaS) market. webMethods.io seems to have the upper hand in affordability and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in feature richness and scalability.

Features: webMethods.io is praised for its extensive connector libraries, ease of integration, and user-friendly configurations. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps stands out for its seamless integration with other Microsoft services, robust workflow automation features, and a broader suite of tools.

Room for Improvement: webMethods.io could enhance its debugging capabilities, offer more detailed documentation, and improve technical support. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs improvements in support response times, simplification of certain features, and reducing the complexity of its deployment process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is highlighted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps provides a more complex deployment experience but benefits from robust customer support due to Microsoft's extensive resources.

Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io users report positive experiences with affordability and clear ROI, appreciating its value for money. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, while more expensive, is deemed worthwhile for its extensive functionality and integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

webMethods.io

Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Cloud Data Integration (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.3%, up from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 8.6%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj

Chief Engineer - Cloud | Azure | Integration at Numerics Cloud

Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent

I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's best feature is that it is compatible with the cloud and has many connectors and third-party adapters."

"If we are working with a service-oriented architecture, as an architect as a baseline, it supports us very well in terms of expandability, and the kind of robustness it brings, especially with its serverless nature is fabulous."

"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."

"The Logic App's designer is one of the vital features"

"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."

"The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment."

"One special aspect of Azure Logic Apps is its easy integration of various applications, especially when connectors are already available. For instance, there are connectors for database applications and systems like SAP. You can drag and drop the connectors to complete your integration quickly."

"It's easy to use, and it's stable."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pros

"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."

"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."

"There were no complexities involved in the setup phase...The product is able to meet my company's API protection needs."

"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."

"Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API."

"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."

"What I like the most about the solution is that it comes with ready-made tools like handling security tokens and OAuth."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"The scalability could be improved."

"The documentation could be better. I think that's the only thing that was causing a normal level of problems. In terms of the documentation, it came from Cosmos DB and an additional product from Microsoft Azure."

"The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here."

"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is good for certain types of workloads, but it doesn't offer many customization options."

"The pricing could be improved."

"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."

"It would be helpful if the vendor could provide more data connectors."

"The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps cons

"Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."

"It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking."

"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."

"The product must add more compatible connectors."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool’s pricing could be better."

"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."

"Its price depends on the number of transactions, storage capacity, etc., defining if the subscription will be monthly or weekly."

"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."

"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."

"The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs."

"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."

"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps pricing and cost advice

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"Pricing is the number-one downfall. It's too expensive. They could make more money by dropping the price in half and getting more customers. It's the best product there is, but it's too expensive."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"I don’t have much idea about prices, but webMethods API Portal is not something cheaper."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"The solution's development license is free for three to six months. We have to pay for other things."

"The product is expensive."

"The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

20%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

Boomi iPaaS vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 31% of the time

Oracle Integration Cloud Service vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 12% of the time

Workato vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 12% of the time

SnapLogic vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps

May 2025

Download Microsoft Azure Logic Apps product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

May 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

Microsoft

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.