Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is 8.3%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent
I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.
Divya Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain
Dealing with the large file sizes has occasionally been a challenge, though we have found workarounds. But dealing with large file sizes could be easy in integrations. I have also come across schema files where headers, footers, and bodies are there, but it's not a valid schema. None of the MSCAs are defined properly. In such cases, we have to think of multiple workarounds, such as splitting or merging. But this is a standard requirement for organizations, so custom solutions should be provided. There are cases when the systems don't expect additional MSCAs, or they expect headers, footers, or tags with different values. But this is not a proper XML. So if we are dealing with XML conversions, mapping, and integrations, we have to do some custom work. These are solutions that Oracle can provide.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"If there's something that isn't possible, you can write some code and call that code from a Logic App."
"Logic Apps is good for helping us run our access on a cloud environment like Azure. It's much easier, more reliable, and better to maintain."
"It's very easy to use, and it's blazing fast. The best thing about Logic Apps is actually its ability to create a solution in a matter of hours. It doesn't need any kind of provisioning, and you don't need any kind of hardware. You can create very small elements like these Logic Apps, and you can build a whole solution from those very simple and small elements. I also like that they are completely incorporated with your existing active directory. You can use user groups directly from the active directory inside Azure and access it from the Logic Apps. You don't need to do anything special, and you just have access. You can just check if the user is, for example, allowed to do some action. Normally it would take you some additional steps and some additional calls to check it. You have to come back to the active directory to make this possible. In Logic Apps, you just have it, and you can use it. I think that there's this concept of logging and recall to the Logic App. It shows you every single step, every single product, and the result it's returning to the next step. It also has an amazing debugging feature. You can rerun some calls and see if, after a correction of the Logic App, for example, you get the correct results. So, it's almost like it's alive. It's like you make a change, poof it, and it's in production, and it's working. The speed of the composition of the problem and creating a real solution for it is extremely fast with this solution. It's extremely fast in creation."
"The prebuilt connectors available for SAP are really useful."
"The solution is very easy for new users because it includes very good documentation and transparency."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration."
"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."
"The lack of features in something like Oracle Integration Cloud leaves some room for leads implementation partners like us"
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"The out-of-box integration between Oracle and SAP is really beneficial"
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"The product's initial setup phase is the best since we don't have to do anything. There is nothing like where you need to do some kind of scaling or capacity planning."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
 

Cons

"The pricing could be improved."
"The scalability could be improved."
"A room for improvement in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that it's expensive. Every step is going to cost you money, so if someone is not doing the steps carefully, at the end of the day, it will cost a lot of money. Each time you execute a step, the cost will depend on how much you use Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, and how many workflow steps you have. Each time a step needs to be executed, there'll be a cost added to your bill. If the developer isn't careful with how he uses the solution, this can blow up the cost. What I'd like to see in the next release of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is for the cost and security to be better."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning."
"It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications."
"An area of improvement I've encountered is related to the number of connectors available in Logic Apps. While there are many connectors, I found that the "send email" connector may not work as expected, and one has to rely on Office 365 plugins or other alternatives. This could enhance user experience, especially when considering the additional overhead and licensing requirements associated with Office 365. It also needs to improve security features."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"I have faced situations where the solution has gone down for five to seven minutes, which is an issue if it happens in the live production environment."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"With JSON, if the tool provides support similar to XML, then it would be helpful."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
"The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
"It is a cost-efficient platform."
"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low."
"I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps's pricing a seven out of ten."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
"The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services."
"In the case of Oracle Integration Cloud, costs can be "predictable" as far as the platform and infrastructure are concerned."
"It specifies how much data you use and how much storage you require, among other things."
"The price is cheaper than all other cloud integration providers."
"Pricing is not on the economic side since it is a tool for enterprise-sized companies."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"Its pricing is relatively lower than other vendors."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is good. It is reasonable and is priced well for the market segment. The model they use is on a per-package unit and we have a two-year subscription."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is reasonable to start with, but when you scale it becomes expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
31%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
40%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.