We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

BMC TrueSight Network Automation vs CA eHealth [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, Quest Software and others in Configuration Management. Updated: January 2022.
564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: 
This product has helped us because we can now do many tasks at once. Rather than copy one file to one device, we can do an entire group at one time.
Top Answer: 
The product should be expanded to include more hardware, beyond Cisco and Juniper devices.
Top Answer: 
We use this product for general task automation, including things like updating our Cisco devices. For example, rolling out patches is something that is automated. The top three processes that we have… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
16th
Views
1,411
Comparisons
798
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
348
Rating
8.5
Unranked
In Configuration Management
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC TrueSight Automation for Networks, TrueSight Automation for Networks, TrueSight Network Automation, BladeLogic Network Automation
CA eHealth Performance Manager
Learn More
Overview

Network automation and management software reduces network outages and downtime by automating configuration, change and compliance processes. Organizations depend on high performance across their network to keep the business running at peak efficiency but new security threats make it hard for network administrators to keep pace with the demands for new services and safeguard the health of the network.

eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.
Offer
Learn more about BMC TrueSight Network Automation
Learn more about CA eHealth [EOL]
Sample Customers
SAP
BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider18%
Government8%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government8%
Healthcare Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise71%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, Quest Software and others in Configuration Management. Updated: January 2022.
564,729 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC TrueSight Network Automation is ranked 16th in Configuration Management with 2 reviews while CA eHealth [EOL] is ranked unranked in Configuration Management. BMC TrueSight Network Automation is rated 8.6, while CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Network Automation writes "Stable, saves us time when updating multiple devices, and it scales well". On the other hand, BMC TrueSight Network Automation is most compared with Micro Focus Network Automation, Cisco DNA Center, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager and Fortinet FortiManager, whereas CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront and Cisco UCS Manager.

We monitor all Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.