BlazeMeter and ReadyAPI Test are two prominent tools in load and API testing solutions. BlazeMeter holds a slight advantage due to its flexibility and scalability in handling JMeter tests and cloud-based load generation, while ReadyAPI Test excels in sophisticated API testing capabilities.
Features: BlazeMeter effectively scales JMeter tests for large load scenarios and integrates with tools like New Relic to provide deep insights during load testing. It simulates global user conditions through cloud-based load generation, offering practical flexibility for testers. ReadyAPI Test is highly regarded for its ability to perform complex API tests with a focus on data-driven testing, providing robust tools for functional testing environments.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could benefit from more accurate server hour calculations and quicker provisioning of load generators. It also needs seamless integration with APM tools and more detailed, flexible reporting options. ReadyAPI Test could improve its reporting features to be more intuitive, and while it's strong in functional testing, better scalability and load performance enhancements are needed.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter is deployable across public and hybrid clouds, offering flexible but potentially complex integration options. Its customer service is responsive, fostering strong feedback loops. ReadyAPI Test is mainly an on-premises solution, which limits its deployment flexibility, but its technical support is highly reliable and effective.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter offers flexible pricing, including custom contract options, making it cost-effective, particularly when extensive features and decreased infrastructure costs are considered. ReadyAPI Test, while more expensive, especially in Europe, delivers significant value through its comprehensive API functionalities, justifying the investment for users focusing on API testing.
The customer service is not available 24/7, which affects its rating.
BlazeMeter has the capability to simulate a higher number of users compared to JMeter standalone.
BlazeMeter is quite scalable, and I rate its scalability as nine out of ten.
I would rate the stability of BlazeMeter as eight out of ten, indicating that it is a stable and reliable solution.
The extra CSV random dataset plugin could be integrated with a simple checkbox in the existing CSV dataset plugin to read files randomly.
The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use.
BlazeMeter requires licensing, which means it is not free like JMeter, adding to the setup cost considerations.
BlazeMeter integrates with JMeter via multiple plugins, which streamlines performance testing, test monitoring, and report sharing.
BlazeMeter offers a higher limit on load simulation compared to standalone JMeter.
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
