BizTalk Server vs Temporal comparison

Microsoft and Temporal Technologies are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #12 with an average rating of 6.8, while Temporal Technologies is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6. Microsoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in PA, compared to Temporal Technologies’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Temporal Technologies users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 16 BizTalk Server reviews

1,370 Views
699 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Temporal

Read 18 Temporal reviews

2,773 Views
2,773 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

Temporal

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

BizTalk Server and Temporal are enterprise integration and orchestration tools, with Temporal leading in modern feature adoption, particularly for microservices. BizTalk Server is noted for comprehensive enterprise application integration capabilities.

Features: BizTalk Server provides comprehensive features for business process automation, data transformation, and cross-platform communication. Temporal excels in microservices orchestration, event-centric architecture, and efficient workflow management, making it suitable for cloud-native applications.

Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could enhance modern application integration, streamline cloud compatibility, and offer more intuitive user interfaces. Temporal may benefit from improved ease of use for non-developers, better integration with traditional IT environments, and more extensive documentation for complex configurations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BizTalk Server offers a traditional deployment model with ample documentation and professional support, which is ideal for established IT setups. Temporal provides a flexible cloud-native model, favoring iterative development and agility, with strong community-driven support.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server involves higher initial costs with a worthwhile ROI due to its robust integration capabilities, while Temporal offers a lower entry cost, focusing on agile environments which can result in higher ROI through reduced operational overhead and faster adaptation to changes.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Temporal Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Temporal

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.8

BizTalk Server offers great ROI for large industries, but smaller businesses might prefer cloud solutions for more flexible options.

Sentiment score

6.0

Temporal's cost-effectiveness reduces maintenance costs, essential for high-reliability needs, automating processes and saving time and expenses.

BizTalk Server's ROI is comparatively higher than Boomi and Workato.

reviewer2759421

Service Owner at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

The ROI is apparent in terms of business case automation; previously, a bunch of people filled in data in NetSuite or managed stocks between warehouses and Amazon, but now everything is automated, saving time.

ManibabuPippalla

Founder & CEO at Lanzar

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.8

User experiences vary, with praised documentation, competent engineers, and mix of Microsoft's support and external consulting for assistance.

Sentiment score

6.7

Temporal service excels through active forums and Slack, despite time zone delays; users praise its responsive support.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.0

BizTalk Server's scalability receives mixed reviews; some find it expandable, others face issues with increasing message volumes.

Sentiment score

7.1

Temporal excels in scalability, managing numerous workflows while requiring robust infrastructure like Cassandra and Kubernetes for optimal performance.

It is time for low-code, no-code, and a quick go-to-market should be faster.

reviewer2759421

Service Owner at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.8

BizTalk Server is stable but struggles with large data, losing relevance as users increasingly transition to cloud solutions.

Sentiment score

6.7

Users find Temporal stable with minor SDK challenges, suggesting better documentation and diagnostics for enhanced stability perceptions.

BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Room For Improvement

BizTalk Server needs better debugging, deployment, scalability, cloud integration, JSON support, API management, and task management to stay competitive.

Improving Temporal's user-friendliness, documentation, visualization, features, and support would enhance usability for beginners and non-technical users.

We initially planned to move to Azure Integration Services, but there are challenges with AIS, so now we are evaluating WebMethods IO.

reviewer2759421

Service Owner at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Setup Cost

BizTalk Server offers flexible deployment but can be costly compared to Azure, with users favoring cloud solutions for efficiency.

Temporal provides cost-effective, flexible pricing with open-source tools, offering savings over competitors, especially for self-hosted deployments.

The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Valuable Features

BizTalk Server excels in seamless integrations, data processing, and reliability with its workflows, adapters, and low-code configurations.

Temporal streamlines workflow management with robust automation, fault tolerance, language integration, and easy deployment via Kubernetes and Docker Compose.

Boomi has advantages over BizTalk Server because it is more flexible, low-code, no-code, easy to implement, and has a fast go-to-market.

reviewer2759421

Service Owner at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

The deployment process is quite straightforward as it provides both Kubernetes and Docker Compose versions, allowing us to run it in ECS containers.

ManibabuPippalla

Founder & CEO at Lanzar

For more quotes and insights, download the Temporal report

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

12th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

Temporal

Ranking in Process Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temporal is 5.9%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Temporal	5.9%
BizTalk Server	1.1%
Other	93.0%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

Offers valuable integration services but requires better cloud adaptation

Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk Server was initially limited because of scalability issues. That is the reason why management has decided to implement IBM WebMethods. We are going to decommission BizTalk Server next year. I believe the API response could be improved in BizTalk Server. We need to increase the number of servers in BizTalk Server. We used to have two servers; later on, we increased to a third server, which has improved performance. We can make it more highly available and scale out to improve BizTalk Server. Scale out means we can increase the number of servers horizontally.

Read full review

ManibabuPippalla

Founder & CEO at Lanzar

Automation streamlines operations and improves time and cost efficiency

My overall experience with Temporal is rated between 8 to 9, mainly due to a learning curve that only senior developers can navigate effectively, which makes it a bit challenging for junior developers. We don't have any instances of on-premise, so I cannot comment on that because we are a first company, with all services deployed on cloud infrastructure. Most of the integration is through RPC or APIs, ensuring all our systems are in cohesion. We do state persistence to a Postgres instance, and we have modified it to our use case with better indexing. And for fault tolerance, we built a queue and an alerting mechanism that notifies us if any workflows fail after specific failure points so we can act upon it. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Temporal an 8.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

I am generally satisfied with BizTalk Server, but there are some gaps, as we have multiple integration tools. Thus, there is associated cost, operation cost, license cost, and CapEx, so we are tryi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

I have not worked with Amazon API Gateway or Mule ESB; I am just testing them. I am using Boomi iPaaS and WebMethods. I did not purchase it on AWS Marketplace; those are product API systems, and in...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temporal?

In terms of pricing, Camunda is indeed costlier than Temporal. The cloud deployment costs differ, and while Camunda 7 can be cheaper due to its integrated setup, comparing latest versions between T...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Temporal?

The only area for improvement in Temporal is the UI. I know it is a non-UI first product, but comparing Camunda versus Temporal UI, there is a difference. Moreover, n8n, being a no-code platform, i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Temporal?

The main purposes for using Temporal are automation flows, especially financial automations and supply chain automations. Our company name is SR, we are a digital-first CPG brand making company, ma...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 11% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

IBM BPM vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 9% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

Camunda vs Temporal

Compared 42% of the time

Flowable vs Temporal

Compared 14% of the time

Orkes vs Temporal

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs Temporal

Compared 7% of the time

Control-M vs Temporal

Compared 4% of the time

More Temporal Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

January 2026

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Temporal

January 2026

Download Temporal product report

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

Temporal automates and manages workflows efficiently, offering resilience in distributed systems with features like retry and fault tolerance. Its capabilities in handling complex workflows and integrating with programming languages make it a valuable tool for managing diverse business logic.

Temporal excels in workflow orchestration, automating tasks across multiple platforms, and ensuring durability in asynchronous operations. It supports long-running workflows and simplifies handling distributed transactions, reducing boilerplate code. Temporal is noted for its durable execution and built-in retry policies, enhancing resilience. Despite its complexity and steep learning curve, it is valued for its integration with popular programming languages and relatively easy setup process, though it requires improvements in user-friendly features, documentation, community support, and security.

What are Temporal's key features?

Automation and Efficient Management: Automatically handles workflows without manual intervention.
Resilience and Fault Tolerance: Features built-in retry policies for increased reliability.
Integration: Supports various programming languages, easing development.
Distributed Transactions: Simplifies complex transaction handling with reduced boilerplate code.
Durable Execution: Ensures long-running workflows are reliably managed.

What benefits or ROI should users evaluate?

Scalability and Reliability: Enhances IT environments through robust workflow management.
Ease of Integration: Supports seamless multi-platform automation.
Improved Operational Efficiency: Reduces need for extensive coding, streamlining processes.
Durability and Fault Tolerance: Provides reliable asynchronous operations.

Temporal is implemented in sectors requiring robust workflow orchestration, such as managing data pipelines, API integration, and scheduling tasks. Organizations in a Kubernetes environment leverage it for its scalability and infrastructure management capabilities, securing integrations and enhancing reliability across IT operations.

Temporal Technologies

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Temporal

December 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. Temporal

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Temporal and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. Temporal report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.