Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs Heimdal Patch and Asset Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (10th)
Heimdal Patch and Asset Man...
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Patch Management (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Bitdefender GravityZone EDR and Heimdal Patch and Asset Management aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is designed for Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and holds a mindshare of 2.6%, down 2.9% compared to last year.
Heimdal Patch and Asset Management, on the other hand, focuses on Patch Management, holds 0.5% mindshare, up 0.4% since last year.
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Patch Management
 

Featured Reviews

AMBARISH PATKAR - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized control effectively manages devices while updates require powered-on systems
I use Bitdefender GravityZone EDR for the grooming industry. It is primarily utilized for the office environment The features I find most effective for threat detection include centralized control policy distribution and the control of independent devices, such as printers, laptops, and desktops…
Melvin Ong - PeerSpot reviewer
Has plug-and-play capability once configured and good reporting system
The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I have found Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra to be highly scalable."
"They are constantly updating the solution against malware."
"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and firewall policies. The runtime scans and execution have been beneficial to our business."
"It was easy to set up."
"Bitdefender is a well-supported platform."
"The advanced direct control on offer is excellent."
"I haven't had a problem with its stability yet. Since we deployed it, we haven't had one computer instance where we had to reimage the computer due to the virus."
"The solution is probably one of the top five, best security solutions on the market at the moment."
"The tool's most valuable features have been its plug-and-play capability once configured and its reporting system is good. The most improved feature of asset auditing is its physical logging of all software. This allows us to understand what software and applications are installed on endpoints. We can easily check which software applications are installed in the network infrastructure during client processing or audits."
 

Cons

"The on-premises setup for Bitdefender sometimes faces issues with connectivity. Management of Windows Defender is a bit easier compared to Bitdefender."
"The solution wasn't designed to be used in France."
"There was a bit of a problem deploying."
"Occasionally websites are unnecessarily blocked due to monitoring software on those sites."
"The firewall security could be better."
"The product can be improved by identifying errors."
"Policy customization and deployment need a little bit of improvement. The push policies, the first line, and all those things."
"In terms of improvement of the solution, it could have better features. For example, having a firewall within. This way we would only need one solution."
"The tool needs to be more user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is cost-effective and has the best pricing."
"It is not that expensive. Compared to its competitors, it is well-priced and well-placed."
"The pricing is competitive."
"The licensing cost has been manageable for our small team."
"The pricing for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra is not that high. It's okay for its service, so I would download it on my personal computer and buy it for myself as a customer."
"The solution's price is mid-ranged."
"Each endpoint device we purchased came with its own license."
"Price-wise, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is a bit expensive in the Philippines."
"I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
6%
University
5%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Agriculture
8%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
The cost is reasonable, with the license costing approximately six to eight dollars per user.
What needs improvement with Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra?
The negative aspect is that when asking for customization, the OEM takes considerable time to implement changes. Many times customization is not possible, and the OEM states that such customization...
 

Also Known As

Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, Bitdefender GravityZone
Thor Foresight Enterprise
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Mentor Graphics, Rudersdal Kommune
Brother, Symbion, CPH West
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: January 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.