Barracuda Email Protection vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity comparison

Barracuda Networks and Mimecast are both solutions in the Email Archiving category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.5, while Mimecast is ranked #7. Barracuda Networks holds a 17.8% mindshare in EA, compared to Mimecast’s 5.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Mimecast users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Email Protection

Read 19 Barracuda Email Protection reviews

2,722 Views
626 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Read 6 Mimecast Mailbox Continuity reviews

287 Views
278 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Barracuda Email Protection

Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 19, 2026

Mimecast Mailbox Continuity and Barracuda Email Protection compete in email security and continuity. Barracuda Email Protection seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive features, while Mimecast is favored for cost-effectiveness and support.

Features: Mimecast offers robust email continuity, seamless access during outages, and effective archiving. Barracuda excels with advanced threat protection, flexible configuration options, and a comprehensive feature set focused on security beyond just continuity and archiving.

Room for Improvement: Mimecast could enhance its threat protection capabilities and expand its integration options. Barracuda may benefit from improving its reporting, simplifying its setup process, and increasing flexibility in policy creation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mimecast is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, minimizing disruptions. Barracuda offers a flexible deployment model suitable for various IT environments, though the setup might require technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Mimecast is recognized for competitive pricing, offering substantial value and lower setup costs, resulting in a favorable ROI. Barracuda, with a higher initial investment, justifies this with comprehensive features, reflecting strong long-term security returns for those prioritizing extensive protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Email Protection

Ranking in Email Archiving

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (13th), Security Incident Response (7th), Office 365 Protection (4th)

Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Ranking in Email Archiving

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Email Archiving category, the mindshare of Barracuda Email Protection is 17.8%, down from 25.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is 5.6%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Archiving Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Barracuda Email Protection	17.8%
Mimecast Mailbox Continuity	5.6%
Other	76.6%

Email Archiving

Featured Reviews

Sherif Fouad

Group ICT Manager at a mining and metals company with 501-1,000 employees

Have raised concerns about scanning engines and automation while continuing to rely on layered protection strategies

Incident response is something that requires more development from Barracuda's side. Regarding room for improvement for Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response, for the product, developing or improving the scanning engine is important, but it's a bit tricky. I know that they are working on it heavily. The difference between Barracuda and Sophos is Sophos focused heavily on cybersecurity while Barracuda tried to increase their product portfolio. Sometimes, in some cases, this might end up with their teams being unfocused or a bit thin and stretched and super busy. However, there is room for improvement. The product is great. The teams that are supporting are great. But there is always room for improvement. Even if you have a product that you would give a rating of 10 out of 10, there is always room for improvement. The day we stop improving is the day we die. Regarding the scanning engine, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response has a very good feature where you can create automated flows for how to handle specific emails that are detected as incidents. This needs a bit of an improvement. That's the only component of Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response that I believe requires improvement.

Read full review

Todd Blake

Senior IT Specialist at COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTIONS INC

Provides peace of mind and expands well but needs a better interface

It's a hosted solution. I'm not sure which version of the solution Im on at this time. I would advise others to research all the options out there and see what the best fit is. We started this mailbox continuity project before we moved to Office 365. And now that we've moved to Office 365, we kind of don't need this piece of technology in the same way that we used to need it when we had an on-prem exchange. Therefore, make sure that you actually need it and then research to find the best options. Overall, I would rate the solution seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is straightforward to set up."

"The beauty of Barracuda Email Protection is that it is easy to manage and simple to deploy."

"We check the reports sometimes to see that frequent attacks and malicious emails are being blocked by the solution."

"The most helpful aspect for me is the out-of-the-box configuration, which is fairly good."

"I would rate the solution nine out of ten."

"At the moment, I am working with Sophos Cloud, Sophos Intercept X; when they introduced the XDR, we used it, and then when they introduced the Optix, we used it, and then we upgraded our subscription with them to MDR, so we are now utilizing Sophos Cloud Central MDR."

"The most valuable features of Barracuda Essentials are it's a trusted name and is rated very high on review sites. It blocks high percentages of spam and junk email and it's in the cloud. They have hardware appliances, but this is in the cloud. The solution is very effective at blocking malware and blocking spam and this is what we are looking for. There's not a whole lot of complexity, you want a solution that is very good at blocking out all of the unwanted emails."

"The archiving and search features are very good."

More Barracuda Email Protection pros

"We're now certain business-critical mail is perfectly protected in multiple ways."

"Mimecast has some good support services in place."

"The most valuable feature of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is real-time alerts."

"The Large File Send feature comes in handy when you have to send fairly large attachments."

"The security is pretty good, and that's why we're going to upgrade to an even more advanced package. We used it when we had a power issue, and it works. It has been pretty reliable, and the support has been quite good."

"It has all the features required for distribution, such as the ability to mail."

Cons

"The solution's reporting mechanism is a little poor and could be improved."

"Barracuda Essentials can improve by continually adding more features."

"The customer service and support could be improved if the support were available directly in Europe. Currently, the support is often managed from India, so we sometimes need to wait due to the time zone difference. It would be quicker and better if the support were provided by European staff."

"They could simplify the licensing and the pricing."

"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) could be improved visually."

"The platform's pricing needs improvement."

"I would like to see some additional functionality in terms of employee monitoring, as part of a work-from-home security solution."

"The product must enable bulk user management."

More Barracuda Email Protection cons

"The interface and the documentation could be improved. They can also include some more training resources and content like video. While setting things up, I had to search for the information quite a bit. It took me time to find the correct way to do something. The information is there, but it is sort of all over the place. They can create a better help knowledge base or help portal. It retains your email for 45 days. They can maybe increase this duration."

"The solution is expensive in comparison to similar solutions."

"The interface isn't the best. How everything works on the back end is confusing."

"Technical support has been slower than it was in the past, likely due to the pandemic."

"The price of the solution is expensive. It can improve by reducing the price."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is similar to that of Microsoft 365."

"We pay annually. They never charged us for anything else. And they were quite a bit under that $20,000 mark. It was $19,074. And they've been pretty good about not skyrocketing the price or anything like that. It has gone up. It's gone up to $24,000 in 2020."

"The price of Barracuda Essentials is better than some of the competing products."

"We didn't have to pay a lot for the solution because we got it from a good vendor with a good user volume."

"Price-wise, this product is middle-of-the-road."

"Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers to easily buy the solution."

"The product is expensive."

"Barracuda licensing model is good."

More Barracuda Email Protection pricing and cost advice

"The price of Mimecast Mailbox Continuity is expensive."

"Its price is in the middle range. It is a structured licensing model where there are various components that you can add or choose to add or not."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Archiving solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Barracuda Email Protection?

Barracuda Email Protection is easy to deploy and maintain. It doesn't require a specialized resource to manage this tool.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Email Protection?

Their list price is too high, but in India, the selling price is affordable at around $10 per user per year. Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Email Protection?

Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings. For instance, for email quarantine, I can't se...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 20% of the time

Mimecast Email Security vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Abnormal Security vs Barracuda Email Protection

Compared 4% of the time

More Barracuda Email Protection Competitors

Proofpoint Intelligent Compliance Platform vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Compared 37% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Compared 25% of the time

KerioConnect vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Compared 19% of the time

Google Vault vs Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Compared 19% of the time

More Mimecast Mailbox Continuity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection

January 2026

Download Barracuda Email Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Email Archiving

January 2026

Download Mimecast Mailbox Continuity product report

Also Known As

Barracuda Essentials, Barracuda Forensics and Incident Response

No data available

Overview

Barracuda Email Protection provides advanced security with features like AI protection and cloud-based spam blocking, making it essential for managing email risks effectively.

Barracuda Email Protection stands out with its robust malware detection, ease of use, and seamless integration with Microsoft 365, serving enterprises by simplifying email threat management. Despite its efficient spam filtering and straightforward setup, users seek improvements in email encryption, third-party vendor integration, report details, and more streamlined performance. Organizations leverage its AI capabilities for phishing detection and employee training, allowing for automated operations and comprehensive threat protection. Its archiving, search, and hands-off management are crucial for companies lacking extensive security resources, ensuring persistent email access and secure practices.

What are the key features of Barracuda Email Protection?

Cloud-Based Spam Blocking: Reduces unwanted emails effectively.
Impersonation Detection: Identifies phishing attempts seamlessly.
Malware Detection: Protects against malicious threats.
AI Protection: Enhances security with intelligent analysis.
Microsoft 365 Integration: Ensures smooth operation within existing systems.
Customizable Rules: Allows tailored security protocols.

What are the main benefits and ROI of Barracuda Email Protection?

Time Savings: Automates and streamlines email management processes.
Email Security: Maintains domain reputation by reducing spam and threats.
Comprehensive Protection: Provides a unified approach to email threats.
Central Management: Simplifies oversight with a unified console.
Reliable Support: Offers technical assistance and guidance.

In finance, healthcare, and large enterprises, Barracuda Email Protection is deployed for its reliable email archiving and retrieval, supporting compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its AI-powered phishing detection and employee training tools, enhancing operational security and reducing risk exposure.

Barracuda Networks

Mimecast Mailbox Continuity provides uninterrupted access to live and archive email using Outlook for Windows, the web and mobile applications.

Mimecast

Sample Customers

ACT Government, Acumen Group, AGIP, Delta Dental Plans Association, Desai/Nasr Consulting Engineers, Inc., Equinox Information Systems

DAC Beachcroft, OceanFirst, Currie & Brown, Alexander Forbes, Lagan Group, Lals Group, Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service, Wedlake Bell, Macmillan Cancer Support, Bech-Bruun

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

December 2025

Free Report: Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Email Protection vs. Mimecast Mailbox Continuity report.

See our list of best Email Archiving vendors.

We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.