Azure Resource Manager vs CyberArk Identity comparison

Microsoft and CyberArk are both solutions in the Cloud Resource Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while CyberArk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.2. Microsoft holds a 16.9% mindshare in CRAM, compared to CyberArk’s 8.3% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

Azure Resource Manager

Read 9 Azure Resource Manager reviews

454 Views
454 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

3,430 Views
34 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Azure Resource Manager

CyberArk Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

CyberArk Identity and Azure Resource Manager compete in the domains of identity security and cloud resource management, respectively. CyberArk Identity appears to hold the advantage with its robust security features, while Azure Resource Manager excels with comprehensive cloud management capabilities.

Features: CyberArk Identity includes user self-service functions, Office 365 provisioning, and robust password rotation with UiPath Orchestrator integration. It provides strong identity management and security features enhancing user security. Azure Resource Manager offers easy resource management, Azure Blueprints for policy definition and resource group integration, and ARM templates for deploying and managing DevOps pipelines effectively.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity can enhance integration capabilities, reduce complexity in deployment, and improve its customer-facing interface for better accessibility. Azure Resource Manager could focus on customizing templates to better suit varied administrative preferences, enhancing its troubleshooting tools, and improving resource scalability insights to benefit large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity is known for a straightforward deployment process and offers personalized customer support tailored to security configurations. Azure Resource Manager benefits from its integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing streamlined deployment and a substantial knowledge base, backed by Microsoft's extensive resources.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity presents a cost-effective solution in identity security, delivering a strong ROI due to its enhanced security capabilities at a moderate setup cost. Azure Resource Manager's pricing varies based on consumption, seen as valuable for enterprises heavily leveraging cloud operations with ROI reflecting its capacity to optimize resource management through extensive Azure service integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,672 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Resource Manager

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (7th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (7th), Active Directory Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Resource Access Management category, the mindshare of Azure Resource Manager is 16.9%, down from 45.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 8.3%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Resource Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Resource Manager	16.9%
CyberArk Identity	8.3%
Other	74.8%

Cloud Resource Access Management

Featured Reviews

MohammedAbdulAleem

Lead Enterprise Architect at Integrated Telecom

Provides unified resource visibility and supports compliance requirements

Azure Resource Manager can be improved in several ways. It should support heterogeneous cloud integration. For example, if I have a cloud management portal from a private cloud provider such as Morpheus from HPE or other private cloud portals, and Azure Resource Manager could integrate with other clouds to give us unified resource utilization or management, that would be really good. Currently, it supports only Microsoft to Microsoft backend and does not support heterogeneous environments; it only supports homogeneous ones. Looking towards the future, I would like to see additional features or improvements in Azure Resource Manager because nowadays companies are going with a multi-cloud model. I am looking for unification of other clouds inside Azure Resource Manager.

Read full review

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My experience with Azure Resource Manager is fantastic; it provides me with a complete landscape of Azure Stack Hub, giving me complete visibility into compute, network, storage, security, and consumed IPs, all of which I can visualize."

"The features for managing the subscriptions and assigning a group of resources to a project team are the most valuable."

"On the management side, Azure Resource Manager helps with things like team management. It also helps on the expert side. It helps us manage projects and services centrally, and it's very useful."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy, as the documentation and information were very good."

"Azure Resource Manager's Role-Based Access Control and ARM tagging features are excellent; Azure Stack Hub is very compliant with CSA, Q-Cert, 27107, and 27018, which is fantastic when it comes to data sovereignty and private cloud offering."

"The most valuable feature is the vast resources available online."

"My experience with Azure Resource Manager is fantastic; it provides me with a complete landscape of Azure Stack Hub, including visibility into compute, network, storage, security, and IP consumption, all of which I can visualize."

"The Azure Resource Manager is complete, where we can manage all the resources."

More Azure Resource Manager pros

"The best features in CyberArk Identity that I appreciate most are the recent updates that have added features in the cloud privilege environment, including Secure Infrastructure Access, Secure Cloud Access, and Secure Web Sessions."

"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."

"I had one machine that I could not use due to an invalid token. They resolved the problem immediately after I reported it, on the same day, within one hour. It is a very good experience."

"The tool is a very strong and valuable enterprise solution, particularly in ensuring the continuity of service."

"The user identification is simplified, and managing user privileges, whether adding or revoking them, is also quite straightforward when utilizing CyberArk SaaS."

"I found the solution to be stable."

"The best features in CyberArk Identity that I appreciate most are the recent updates that have added features in the cloud privilege environment."

"CyberArk Identity is a mature product."

More CyberArk Identity pros

Cons

"Unlike Terraform, Azure Resource Manager is hard to maintain and modularize and has room for improvement."

"The latency has room for improvement."

"Azure Resource Manager can be improved in several ways. It should support heterogeneous cloud integration."

"They can maybe improve the interface."

"They have created multiple roles, but I would rather they simplify the roles they already have. The main goal is to work with efficient data. Their support could also be better."

"Lacks a common line within the user interface for automating or scaling a reserve deployment."

"Azure Resource Manager can be improved in several ways. It should support heterogeneous cloud integration."

"Compared to ARM templates, Terraform is often preferred because it is more versatile and user-friendly. With Terraform, you can create a single, generic script that works across multiple cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and even Oracle Cloud. This eliminates the need to write separate scripts for each platform."

More Azure Resource Manager cons

"It was pretty complex to implement CyberArk Identity. We had some help from a partner, and that helped a lot. But even for the partner, it was really difficult to streamline the process of implementing."

"Something they could improve is the management of multifactor authentication. When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process."

"Room for improvement for CyberArk Identity might be on the support side, as they constantly improve with new features and remove redundant ones, integrating multiple steps into a single one for easier use; however, this is not just CyberArk Identity, as many vendors start with basic troubleshooting services without recognizing that knowledgeable users often reach out after exhausting those options."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"The OpenID features could improve in CyberArk Identity."

"I faced some challenges during the initial setup of CyberArk Identity. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components."

"At the moment CyberArk needs to enrich Conjur and it needs to be made more viable so that its adoption can be made much faster."

"When you translate the page from one language to another, it can be a difficult process. The translation isn't always good, and it may have a completely different name. I've noticed this in the English to Spanish translation."

More CyberArk Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We pay $15,000 to $20,000 a month for the service and it is worth the cost."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"There could be some additional costs apart from the licensing costs of the solution when you want to develop connectors in CyberArk Identity."

"I think it is a fairly priced tool. I rate the tool between six and seven on a scale of one to ten where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"In terms of pricing, BeyondTrust and CyberArk tend to be more expensive, with CyberArk receiving an eight out of ten, in this regard."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Resource Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Resource Manager?

About the pricing, it is expensive. Maintaining Azure Stack Hub is not easy because it is expensive, though it depends on customer to customer. If the customer is looking for a secure, compliant cl...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Resource Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Resource Manager?

In dealing with something like Site Recovery or Azure Bastion or Azure AI Foundry, we are having a very minimal type of implementation that is only four nodes. Microsoft Azure Resource Manager is b...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Resource Access Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 58% of the time

Google Cloud Resource Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 42% of the time

More Azure Resource Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 11% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager

January 2026

Download Azure Resource Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

January 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Idaptive

Overview

The Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is the service used to provision resources in your Azure subscription. It was first announced at Build 2014 when the new Azure portal ( portal.azure.com ) was announced and provides a new set of API's that are used to provision resources.

Microsoft

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity report.

See our list of best Cloud Resource Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Resource Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.