Azure Resource Manager vs CyberArk Identity comparison

Microsoft and CyberArk are both solutions in the Cloud Resource Access Management category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0, while CyberArk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 25.3% mindshare in CRAM, compared to CyberArk’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of CyberArk users who would recommend it.

Azure Resource Manager

Read 8 Azure Resource Manager reviews

466 Views
466 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

Read 28 CyberArk Identity reviews

2,972 Views
0 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Azure Resource Manager

CyberArk Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

CyberArk Identity and Azure Resource Manager compete in the domains of identity security and cloud resource management, respectively. CyberArk Identity appears to hold the advantage with its robust security features, while Azure Resource Manager excels with comprehensive cloud management capabilities.

Features: CyberArk Identity includes user self-service functions, Office 365 provisioning, and robust password rotation with UiPath Orchestrator integration. It provides strong identity management and security features enhancing user security. Azure Resource Manager offers easy resource management, Azure Blueprints for policy definition and resource group integration, and ARM templates for deploying and managing DevOps pipelines effectively.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity can enhance integration capabilities, reduce complexity in deployment, and improve its customer-facing interface for better accessibility. Azure Resource Manager could focus on customizing templates to better suit varied administrative preferences, enhancing its troubleshooting tools, and improving resource scalability insights to benefit large-scale operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk Identity is known for a straightforward deployment process and offers personalized customer support tailored to security configurations. Azure Resource Manager benefits from its integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, providing streamlined deployment and a substantial knowledge base, backed by Microsoft's extensive resources.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity presents a cost-effective solution in identity security, delivering a strong ROI due to its enhanced security capabilities at a moderate setup cost. Azure Resource Manager's pricing varies based on consumption, seen as valuable for enterprises heavily leveraging cloud operations with ROI reflecting its capacity to optimize resource management through extensive Azure service integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Resource Manager

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Cloud Resource Access Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (10th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (8th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (5th), Active Directory Management (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Cloud Resource Access Management category, the mindshare of Azure Resource Manager is 25.3%, down from 49.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 3.8%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Resource Access Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Resource Manager	25.3%
CyberArk Identity	3.8%
Other	70.9%

Cloud Resource Access Management

Featured Reviews

BhanuChidigam

Sofware Engineering Manager at Wells Fargo

Offers good documentation and reliability

The most valuable feature of the solution is Azure Blueprints. With Azure Blueprints, you can define a template. The tool helps where you can define or where you can incorporate your policies and identities along with resource groups. You can also provide options to accept the inputs. There are a few things that the tool should allow you to customize according to your needs. I may want to use Bob as an administrator, while someone else wants to use Alice as an administrator. Prompting that user input while executing that template is what I mean when I say input. I found the tool's look helpful in minimizing your rescan compliance.

Read full review

Julio Montero

Access Management Analyst at Telefónica

Access management system provides strong security and effortless user authentication

The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. CyberArk is more on the cloud than on local hardware. The deployment is initially quite difficult. That said, when you are doing the implementation of CyberArk, there are so many tutorials that make the learning process very easy. The only complaint could be the language barrier. It's difficult if you don't have a very good level of English. Otherwise, it is very easy. You can have it set up within three months without much difficulty. It's hard to get started, however, once you get going, it gets easier. A full deployment takes half a year or less. There is some maintenance necessary. A company is constantly hiring and letting go of employees. The access is always changing, so access must always be adjusted. Or, if we need another law of filter, we would need to add those, or even take them away. That's another aspect of maintenance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's initial setup phase was easy, as the documentation and information were very good."

"It's user friendly and it's easy to manage reserve incentives ."

"The features for managing the subscriptions and assigning a group of resources to a project team are the most valuable."

"Azure Resource Manager is extremely user-friendly and easy to deploy and understand."

"On the management side, Azure Resource Manager helps with things like team management. It also helps on the expert side. It helps us manage projects and services centrally, and it's very useful."

"ARM templates make parameterizing and using variables in your DevOps pipeline easy."

"The most valuable feature is the vast resources available online."

"The Azure Resource Manager is complete, where we can manage all the resources."

"The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory."

"The features that I personally find most effective in terms of security stem from the fact that it is easy to integrate and also the adoption is faster."

"Overall, I would rate CyberArk Identity a nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The user self-service program and the Office 365 provisioning service feature are the most valuable. It is a very easy and feature-rich solution that gives priority to the users and security."

"Being able to integrate CyberArk Identity with Microsoft Defender is valuable."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"The UI is very simplified, and the documentation of CyberArk Identity is very crisp and clear."

More CyberArk Identity pros

Cons

"Unlike Terraform, Azure Resource Manager is hard to maintain and modularize and has room for improvement."

"The latency has room for improvement."

"They can maybe improve the interface."

"Compared to ARM templates, Terraform is often preferred because it is more versatile and user-friendly. With Terraform, you can create a single, generic script that works across multiple cloud environments, including AWS, Azure, GCP, and even Oracle Cloud. This eliminates the need to write separate scripts for each platform."

"Lacks a common line within the user interface for automating or scaling a reserve deployment."

"They should focus more on AI features such as Copilot."

"They have created multiple roles, but I would rather they simplify the roles they already have. The main goal is to work with efficient data. Their support could also be better."

"At a group level, if I apply a policy, it gets cascaded to all the resources underneath it, but it is not possible when it comes to tags. When I apply tags at a group level, it should go to the resource under it."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

"Integration or deployment is extremely difficult for CyberArk Identity."

"The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated."

"The product needs to leverage the cloud more, especially in the financial sector, where cloud adoption might be limited. Proper reporting within the cloud is essential. The tool should be more user-friendly to expedite access for users. The current agent-based system poses challenges if a user loses access to the server, making tasks difficult to perform. It should also improve technical support."

"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."

"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."

"The user interface could be improved."

More CyberArk Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"We pay $15,000 to $20,000 a month for the service and it is worth the cost."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"The pricing of CyberArk Identity is competitive."

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Resource Access Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Resource Manager?

Regarding licensing costs, if we talk about the Azure license or the subscription-based license offered separately by Microsoft, there is a huge difference, as the Azure pay-as-you-go model lets us...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Resource Manager?

It totally depends on Microsoft, and I am not the concerned person for Microsoft to amend the services. Microsoft involves the Copilot for Azure, which also gives benefits to the customer. There ar...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Resource Manager?

I am asking about the main use cases for Azure Resource Manager, which is to manage resources and provide a single link to view all services in a particular resource group. Azure Resource Manager m...

See all answers

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

The reporting functionality is somewhat complicated. While I would rate CyberArk Identity and Okta on the same level, Okta's reporting is crisper and clearer. For CyberArk Identity, you need knowle...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Resource Access Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 62% of the time

Google Cloud Resource Manager vs Azure Resource Manager

Compared 38% of the time

More Azure Resource Manager Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 19% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 8% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 5% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager

September 2025

Download Azure Resource Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

September 2025

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Also Known As

No data available

Idaptive

Overview

The Azure Resource Manager (ARM) is the service used to provision resources in your Azure subscription. It was first announced at Build 2014 when the new Azure portal ( portal.azure.com ) was announced and provides a new set of API's that are used to provision resources.

Microsoft

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Buyer's Guide

Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

July 2025

Free Report: Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Resource Manager vs. CyberArk Identity report.

See our list of best Cloud Resource Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Resource Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.