We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra ID and Red Hat Single Sign On based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have about 80 users in the Azure Active Directory right now, however, we know that if it was necessary to scale it for hundreds or thousands of users, it wouldn't be a problem."
"The solution allows users to authenticate from home, and the Office 360 integration is advantageous."
"We have not had any formal issues with scalability."
"It is great for mom-and-pop shops or small businesses that are truly coming into the enterprise ecosystem and that have not come from a legacy environment."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to delegate roles to each individual resource, which is great."
"Conditional access is a very important feature where a specific user can be restricted such that they cannot connect to the application if they travel outside of the US."
"The most valuable features in Active Directory are the password writeback product and the MDM technology."
"The most valuable features of this solution are security, the conditional access feature, and multifactor authentication."
"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."
"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."
"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."
"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."
"Good support for single sign-on protocols."
"I would like to be able to authenticate Wi-Fi users using the Azure ID"
"When it comes to identity governance, the governance features in Azure AD are very focused on Microsoft products. I would like to see those governance and life cycle management features offered for non-Microsoft products connected to Azure AD."
"Microsoft needs to add a single setup, so whenever resources join the company or are leaving the company, all of the changes can be made with a single click."
"The SSO MyApps interface is very basic and needs better customization capabilities."
"The workflow management for registering new applications and users could be improved."
"They have had a few outages, so stability is a little bit of an issue. It is global. That is the thing. I know some of the other competitors are regionalized ID platforms, but Entra ID is global, so when something goes wrong, it is a problem because it underpins everything, whether you are logging in to M365 or you have single sign-on to Azure, Autopilot, Intune, Exchange mailbox or another application. If there is a problem with Entra ID, all of that falls apart, so its great strength and weakness is the global single tenant for it. Stability is a key area for me. Otherwise, it is generally pretty good."
"I think the solution can improve by making the consumption of that data easier for our customers."
"I would like to see improvements made when it comes to viewing audit logs, sign-in logs, and resource tags."
"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."
"The product’s technical support services could be better."
"Security could be improved."
"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."
Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 190 reviews while Red Hat Single Sign On is ranked 11th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 4 reviews. Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6, while Red Hat Single Sign On is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Allows users to authenticate from home and has excellent integrations in a simple, stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Single Sign On writes "It is very easy to scale and use as you want, but there could be more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses". Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Yubico YubiKey and Cisco Duo, whereas Red Hat Single Sign On is most compared with Auth0, Okta Workforce Identity, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, PingFederate and AWS IAM Identity Center. See our Microsoft Entra ID vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
