Auth0 Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On comparison

Okta and Red Hat are both solutions in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category. Okta is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.6, while Red Hat is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. Okta holds a 6.8% mindshare in SSO, compared to Red Hat’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of Okta users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Auth0 Platform

Read 19 Auth0 Platform reviews

4,690 Views
2,580 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Red Hat Single Sign On

Read 5 Red Hat Single Sign On reviews

962 Views
962 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Auth0 Platform

Red Hat Single Sign On

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2025

Auth0 and Red Hat Single Sign On compete in the authentication and identity management category. Auth0 appears to have the upper hand due to its strong security, flexibility, and extensive features.

Features: Auth0 offers client-side authentication, diverse social media integration, and customizable APIs. It provides extensive documentation and excels in global compliance standards. Red Hat Single Sign On is praised for its open-source nature and affordable pricing, offering good integration capabilities and adherence to standardized protocols.

Room for Improvement: Auth0 needs simplified pricing models and improved machine-to-machine authentication flows. Customization limitations in the Organizations feature have been noted. Red Hat Single Sign On could improve its security features, user manipulation tracking, and audit functionalities. Scalability and technical support could also be enhanced.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Auth0 is appreciated for its seamless deployment in cloud environments and high customer support ratings. Red Hat supports on-premises and hybrid setups but faces challenges with staff rotation, reducing support continuity.

Pricing and ROI: Auth0's pricing is seen as aggressive by some, yet it provides significant ROI through reduced development time. Red Hat Single Sign On is generally viewed as cost-effective, especially with OpenShift subscriptions, despite some viewing it as expensive without those benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Auth0 Platform

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

5th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Access Management (5th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (2nd), AI IT Support (6th)

Red Hat Single Sign On

Ranking in Single Sign-On (SSO)

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Single Sign-On (SSO) category, the mindshare of Auth0 Platform is 6.8%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Single Sign On is 2.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Single Sign-On (SSO) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Auth0	6.8%
Red Hat Single Sign On	2.1%
Other	91.1%

Single Sign-On (SSO)

Featured Reviews

Vishal Chopade

Senior Software Engineer at Charter Communications

Secure API access for enterprises has improved and provides dynamic authentication for users

The best features Auth0 offers are its scalability and it is a better way of authenticating a user compared to just a tokenized version of authentication where the token is static and does not offer dynamic authentication compared to how Auth0 offers it. While working in a dynamic environment where there are many enterprises involved in the service, you need a tool that can authenticate them on the go, which is why I like it. Auth0 has positively impacted my organization. Previously we used the tokenized version of authentication. The work was simple, but when you push this code to deployment and enterprises are involved, it makes much more sense to authenticate them through Auth0 so that you can just get a login for yourself when you are authenticated, which helps to dynamically scale depending on the product and its viability. The specific outcomes since I started using Auth0 include time-saving, more security, and scalability, which are the three things I would emphasize.

Read full review

Giovanni Baruzzi

Owner at Syntlogo GmbH

A stable and flexible solution with some basic capabilities

I set up Red Hat Single Sign-On in half an hour. I had to install a single sign-on solution for a customer. I reviewed a list of all available products, which were no more than fifty, and analyzed them. I chose it because it was convincing, modern, and based on technology from 2015. I put my trust in this product, and after nine years, I feel confident in my decision. Deploying this solution usually takes half an hour. You need an operating system running, then deploy the packages and prepare the interfaces. I rate the initial setup a ten out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Auth0 has the best support ever."

"The valuable features are that it is extremely secure and that it's developer-friendly."

"I simply use the JWT from the client on the server side to process requests and push updated profile data to a database/queue as needed and end the process without having to persist data in the web server (sessions)."

"It's a very powerful platform. It has the ability to do the usual stuff, according to modern protocols, like OIDC and OAuth 2. But the real benefit of using the platform comes from its flexibility to enhance it with rules and, now, with what they call authentication pipelines. That is the most significant feature, as it allows you to customize everything regarding the authentication and authorization process."

"It supports identity federation, FSO and multi-tenancy."

"It has a lot of customization and out-of-the-box features."

"The most important feature for me was the ease of use, as it needed to be easy to integrate into my platform."

"It is easily connected and easy to put our app in single sign-on."

More Auth0 Platform pros

"Red Hat SSO has a lot of very concise, well laid out documentation, which is available in the free edition as well."

"Good support for single sign-on protocols."

"It is very easy to scale and use as you want."

"Red Hat SSO integrates well with our other solutions. Using OIDC protocols and ITL integration, employees can authenticate with Red Hat SSO and access our microservices."

"The solution is flexible and has the same basic capabilities right out of the box. The most important feature of this product is that it is a Red double-sided product. One side is a well-known open-source project; the other is a Red Hat commercial product. The commercial product benefits from all the experience and contributions of the community, making it a very well-developed product."

"The product’s most valuable feature is its ability to assign only one password for the user at a false value."

Cons

"I think they can do a better job in explaining what you're supposed to do next in order to correctly follow an idiomatic approach to using the solution beyond simply passing a JWT token to a server and having the server check then signature to validate the token."

"When they introduced the Organizations feature they did support different login screens per organization. However, they introduced a dependency between this feature and another called the New Universal Login Experience. The New Experience is a more lightweight login screen, but it is much less customizable. For example, today, we are able to fully customize our login screen and even control the background image according to the time of day. We have code to do that. But we are not able to write code anymore in the New Experience."

"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile."

"The product could use a more flexible administration structure"

"This is a costly solution and the price of it should be reduced."

"I find it surprising that there is no access to a standard user profile."

"There is a possibility to improve the machine-to-machine authentication flow. This part of Auth0 is not really well documented, and we could really gain some additional knowledge on that."

"There could be easy integration with IoT devices for the product."

More Auth0 Platform cons

"Security could be improved."

"Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources."

"Red Hat SSO's architecture could be updated."

"They could provide more checks and balances to find out if there have been any security lapses, e.g., if somebody is trying to break into the system. Some other products have these detection mechanisms in case someone is trying to hack into the system or find out a user's passwords."

"The product’s technical support services could be better."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am pretty happy with the pricing model of Auth0. It is very clear for me. Considering our scale, the features that we are using, and additional features that we bought, we still find it great. If you split the costs for the whole year and calculate the number of people you needed to hire, it always comes out to be much lesser than what we would have spent on building our own solution."

"The tool is cheaper compared to competing solutions. Those alternatives tended to be more expensive. Consequently, Okta purchased it because it was considerably cheaper. The solution even offered some free services while still providing excellent functionality."

"Pricing of Auth0 is a pain point. Their pricing model is very confusing, at least for an enterprise. I don't like their pricing model. I think it's too aggressive. It's not very cheap for a service that only does authentication."

"It is a relatively inexpensive product in the industry."

"There are different price levels: B2B, B2C, and enterprise. The basic plan is about $1,500 per month."

"If you want support, that is when you use the paid version. There are different support categories that you can pay for, which provide different support levels. E.g., there is a quick response if you pay a higher amount, where the response time is within a few hours."

"The license is around $8000 USD."

"Red Hat Single Sign On is expensive."

"It is a low cost product. This product can be used by non-profit organizations or universities, when they don't want to invest a lot of money."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Single Sign-On (SSO) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

20%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auth0?

It is very scalable because it provides a new environment for companies based on their number of users and other factors. The tool can take a lot of users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auth0?

The cost of the solution itself was cost-effective enough that I didn't even need to compare it with EntraID.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Auth0?

I do not think there are any improvements needed for Auth0, other than maybe making it more visible to beginners. Auth0 could be made more accessible to beginners.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Single Sign On?

I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Single Sign On?

Red Hat publishes much more and communicates its actions and plans. They could provide words, maps, and other resources. Scalability could be improved, too. It could provide more documentation.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Single Sign On?

Earlier, customers used to authenticate the user before they used the application. With the help of Single Sign On, the customer logs in and uses all of the customer's applications without authenti...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Entra ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 17% of the time

Okta Platform vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra External ID vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 6% of the time

ForgeRock vs Auth0 Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Auth0 Platform Competitors

Microsoft Entra ID vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 19% of the time

Okta Platform vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 15% of the time

AWS IAM Identity Center vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 14% of the time

ManageEngine Password Manager Pro vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs Red Hat Single Sign On

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat Single Sign On Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform

December 2025

Download Auth0 Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Single Sign-On (SSO)

December 2025

Download Red Hat Single Sign On product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Single Sign-On, Red Hat SSO, RH SSO, RH-SSO

Overview

Auth0 Platform utilizes JWT-based authentication and supports over 30 social logins, enabling integration with various codebases. Known for robust security, compliance, and scalability, it's tailored for enterprises needing customizable, efficient authentication solutions.

Auth0 Platform is a comprehensive identity management system used for customer, business-to-business, and API authentication across cloud infrastructures like AWS, Azure, and GCP. It simplifies user logins and identity management with features like Single Sign-On, identity federation, and multi-tenancy. Enterprises rely on it for its dynamic authentication capabilities and efficient management of user roles. However, areas for enhancement include authorization features, flexible pricing for small developers, and enhanced documentation for machine-to-machine authentication. Improving multi-tenancy support and customizable login experiences could elevate its appeal.

What are the key features of Auth0 Platform?

JWT-Based Authentication: Simplifies infrastructure with secure token-based access.
Social Logins: Supports over 30 social platforms for seamless user experiences.
Customizability: Tailors authentication flows to meet enterprise specifications.
Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds layers of security to authentication processes.
API Integration: Facilitates robust connections between applications and services.
User-Friendly Documentation: Provides clear guidance for developers implementing Auth0 features.

What benefits and ROI should users look for when evaluating Auth0?

Scalability: Handles growth while maintaining performance.
Security Compliance: Meets multiple regulatory requirements with ease.
Integration Flexibility: Adapts to diverse environments and codebases.
Enhanced User Management: Offers tools for efficient user role handling.
Dynamic Authentication Processes: Accommodates varying enterprise authentication needs.

In industries deploying Auth0 Platform, such as cloud-based service providers and enterprises using API-driven architectures, its implementation focuses on secure and seamless user logins. Many leverage its readiness for scaling authentication processes and its extensibility, including support for Single Sign-On and identity federation, to create streamlined user experiences across businesses. Expanding multi-factor authentication beyond traditional methods and refining social login integrations are common approaches to address specific industry needs.

Okta

Red Hat is the world’s leading provider of enterprise open source solutions, using a community-powered approach to deliver high-performing Linux, cloud, container, and Kubernetes technologies.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

1. Airbnb 2. Accenture 3. Adidas 4. Atlassian 5. Audi 6. Baidu 7. BlackRock 8. Cisco 9. CocaCola 10. Dell 11. eBay 12. FedEx 13. Fiat Chrysler 14. Ford 15. Google 16. Groupon 17. Hewlett Packard Enterprise 18. IBM 19. Intel 20. LinkedIn 21. Mastercard 22. Mercedes Benz23. Microsoft 24. Nike 25. Oracle 26. PayPal 27. Pinterest 28. Qualcomm 29. SAP 30. Spotify 31. Tesla 32. Toyota

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

December 2025

Free Report: Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Auth0 Platform vs. Red Hat Single Sign On report.

See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.

We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.