Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs E2E Bridge comparison

Axway and Scheer are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. Axway is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0, while Scheer is ranked #22. Axway holds a 1.9% mindshare in BBM, compared to Scheer’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Scheer users who would recommend it.

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Read 2 Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration reviews

270 Views
113 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

E2E Bridge

Read 2 E2E Bridge reviews

36 Views
24 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

E2E Bridge

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

E2E Bridge and Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration both cater to B2B needs. E2E Bridge has an advantage in pricing and customer support, while Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration excels with its extensive feature set.

Features: E2E Bridge offers customizable workflows, real-time data integration, and a streamlined approach. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration provides comprehensive data management, API connectivity, and extensive capabilities for complex integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: E2E Bridge features straightforward deployment and accessible customer service, focusing on swift implementation. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration involves a complex setup but offers in-depth customer support.

Pricing and ROI: E2E Bridge provides a cost-effective initial setup, leading to faster ROI, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration requires a higher setup cost but is justified with advanced features and long-term ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

14th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

E2E Bridge

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration is 1.9%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of E2E Bridge is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

SantoshKumar11

Application Support Engineer (owner) at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The user interface is easy to understand, but its performance could be improved

I also work with IBM Sterling B2B Integrator. Unlike Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator doesn't have a UI-based platform to monitor all incoming and outgoing transactions. We use IBM Sterling B2B Integrator for everything, including transmission. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration only for transmission purposes. We use Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it has a great user interface, which makes it very easy to monitor everything. IBM Sterling B2B Integrator is better than Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration because it is a very robust solution. Unlike cloud-based systems, IBM Sterling B2B Integrator can handle very complex logic. It can easily process files with 5 GB to 10 GB sizes. Once you take the license, you won't have to pay anything extra for computing power.

Read full review

it_user651531

ESB/ABAP developer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees

You can build your model with a graphical interface using UML. Apart from some scripting, there is no coding.

An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console. The only way to test services on the Bridge is to have them scheduled so that they run at a specific moment in time. It is, at this time, not possible to trigger this by hand from the console. It is possible to trigger it via the analyze tool, which is used to trace the service. It would be nice to have a simple way to test services without having to schedule them. This is no problem for a developer, but from the functional consultant point of view, the functional consultant needs to test the service and determine if it meets the requirements. It's not a big issue, but it would be nice to have.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

Compared to other SaaS platforms, the solution's pricing is less.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

The solution's performance could be improved and made similar to that of IBM Sterling B2B Integrator.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration?

We use the solution for transmission purposes, where we send files from our system to the customer's system.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Compared 69% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration

Compared 31% of the time

More Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration Competitors

iWay EIM Suite vs E2E Bridge

Compared 100% of the time

More E2E Bridge Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

June 2025

Download Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration product report

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

June 2025

Download E2E Bridge product report

Also Known As

B2Bi, Axway B2Bi, AMPLIFY B2B Integration

No data available

Overview

Axway B2Bi is an advanced B2B gateway solution for establishing connections and managing information flows between your internal applications and your B2B community — on premise or in the cloud.

B2Bi provides the visibility you need to find information about business-critical files and messages, and the analytics you need to be proactive, react to exceptions, and improve your overall business processes and SLAs.

Axway B2Bi can replace or consolidate existing B2B and EDI systems and integrate transactions and processes with Oracle, SAP, Lawson and other business systems — all with easy partner on-boarding, high security and scalability, and built-in system administration.

Axway

The E2E Bridge is the first "business" middleware. It facilitates rapid process and systems integration by helping technical and non-technical stakeholders to communicate effectively.

Scheer

Sample Customers

Procter & Gamble, ASEAN, OneHealthPort

Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel

Buyer's Guide

Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge

June 2025

Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge

Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Axway AMPLIFY B2B Integration vs. E2E Bridge report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.