No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

E2E Bridge vs Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

E2E Bridge
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Business-to-Business Middleware (21st)
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

E2E Bridge and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. E2E Bridge is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 1.7%, up 1.1% compared to last year.
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 3.0% mindshare, down 3.1% since last year.
Business-to-Business Middleware Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
E2E Bridge1.7%
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform9.8%
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite9.6%
Other78.9%
Business-to-Business Middleware
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)3.0%
SSIS4.0%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)3.8%
Other89.2%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

it_user651531 - PeerSpot reviewer
ESB/ABAP developer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
You can build your model with a graphical interface using UML. Apart from some scripting, there is no coding.
An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console. The only way to test services on the Bridge is to have them scheduled so that they run at a specific moment in time. It is, at this time, not possible to trigger this by hand from the console. It is possible to trigger it via the analyze tool, which is used to trace the service. It would be nice to have a simple way to test services without having to schedule them. This is no problem for a developer, but from the functional consultant point of view, the functional consultant needs to test the service and determine if it meets the requirements. It's not a big issue, but it would be nice to have.
Hafiz Mannan - PeerSpot reviewer
Head of Data Services – Services Partner at 3 As Technologies
Facilitates complex data integration with ease and flexibility
It would be great if ODI could link the designer, mapping, and workflows in a more simplified manner, maybe in one combined interface. It would be excellent not to have to go into different areas to perform different activities but rather have a user-defined interface where we can configure a job, run it, monitor it, link packages, and link subprocesses all in one frame instead of having the designer separately, mapping separately, and monitoring and session management separately. With respect to data quality challenges, it would be great to give an option to fix data quality issues based on AI. Integrating AI with ODI that provides recommendations on how to fix those data quality issues after analyzing and profiling business data would be excellent. One of the main disadvantages of the Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is that it sometimes takes a lot of resources when handling multiple jobs. The scalability and the ability to handle multiple workloads of several parallel ETL jobs could use improvement, and certain parallel threads should be added along with the ability to configure multiple jobs from the same data directory structure.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"E2E is cheaper compared to IBM, Oracle, webMethods, and other middleware solutions."
"What I like about the Bridge is the way that you build your model with a graphical interface using UML."
"​The installation of the client ODI Studio is easy.​"
"ODI's most valuable features are it utilizes the database engine and is very lightweight."
"ODI is a very accessible tool, especially since the mapping functionality has been added."
"Our developers created best performing ETLs with very little effort leveraging this feature."
"All ETL code is stored in repositories in underlying database schemas. The number of users can access and work on the same solution using a client tool. So distributed teams can work on this tool in an efficient manner."
"We realized we were behind and purchased a whole stack of Oracle products that have simplified the way we move and track data."
"Before adopting this solution we used to work hard, and we now feel better because our manual work is completely over."
"I found nothing overly amazing about this tool, although I appreciate its ability to easily load slowly changing dimensions."
 

Cons

"An area of improvement is the stopping and starting of services from the Bridge server console."
"Maybe they need to support more connectivity protocols."
"I would like to see in the next version/release the ability to scale a package workflow or data flow process during the execution at run time."
"The main problem with ODI is that you have to create each step of the transformation as a new interface. A big data flow can have more than 100 interfaces, which can make it difficult to trace the data."
"The price needs to be lowered. It's too expensive."
"Click intensive on mapping Lots of mouse clicking GUI could be improved."
"I would only point out some minor bugs or glitches in the development interface (ODI studio)."
"The Oracle Data Integrator interface is extremely slow, especially when using remote desktop connections."
"It is still not as stable as the old BI Apps and ELT tools were, but it's getting there."
"As with any big tool, truly mastering ODI may take months."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"There is a standard license to use the solution but there are other costs in addition, such as hardware and operating system."
"I have yet to determine the exact figure for Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) pricing, but it has lower pricing than Informatica."
"I rate the platform pricing as five out of ten."
"The solution is very expensive."
"Being an ODI developer, I never had to pay for this product. I know that the pricing/licensing is not really low, but the product is really good."
"ODI comes included when buying the cloud version of the Oracle database license."
"The solution is expensive because of the model they use. The cost is for the license and for support."
"The license can be costly, but in certain complex cases, ODI proves to be the optimal solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Database Administrator at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
14%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business26
Midsize Enterprise12
Large Enterprise44
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
In comparison with other products of the same range, licensing mode is really attractive, no need to license according technology/topology to be used and an incredible Versatility to build any Data...
 

Also Known As

No data available
ODI
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Agri Retail, dodenhof, PKZ, Nikon, Ypsomed, EVN, Landwirtschaftsverlag Mªnster, Intrum Justitia, UBS, B2BNet, Ammann, Antalis, Apareoo, Coutts, Franke, Swissgrid, UPC Cablecom, Vontobel
Griffith University, Kansas City Power & Light, Keste, Raymond James Financial, Valdosta State University
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, IBM, Salesforce and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: October 2026.
921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.