Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs WSO2 API Manager comparison

Axway and WSO2 are both solutions in the API Management category. Axway is ranked #16 with an average rating of 9.0, while WSO2 is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.7. Axway holds a 1.6% mindshare in APIM, compared to WSO2’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Axway users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.
Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Read 12 Axway AMPLIFY API Management reviews
  • 2,004 Views
  • 1,470 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
WSO2 API Manager
Read 41 WSO2 API Manager reviews
  • 6,382 Views
  • 4,570 Comparison Views
94% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Axway AMPLIFY API Management and WSO2 API Manager compete in the API management space. Axway AMPLIFY has the upper hand with its comprehensive integration capabilities and strong security features, while WSO2 stands out for its robustness and cost-effectiveness.

Features: Axway AMPLIFY offers impressive data integration features, advanced security protocols, and multi-cloud access, along with advanced analytics for API usage tracking. In contrast, WSO2 API Manager provides an open-source architecture with numerous deployment options for hybrid environments, customizable workflows, and efficient API lifecycle management.

Room for Improvement: Axway AMPLIFY could enhance its open-source offerings and reduce installation complexity. Additionally, further customization options could attract more users. For WSO2 API Manager, improving advanced security features, documentation clarity, and user interface consistency would be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Axway AMPLIFY supports multi-cloud deployment, providing straightforward installation and robust support services. WSO2 API Manager offers versatile deployment options, including on-premises, cloud, or hybrid setups, and benefits from comprehensive documentation and community support. Axway's customer service is noted for being streamlined, while WSO2 benefits from community-driven support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Axway AMPLIFY typically has higher initial setup costs but delivers significant ROI through extensive features, making it suitable for large enterprises. WSO2 API Manager offers a cost-effective entry point due to its open-source foundation, providing substantial ROI by minimizing initial expenses and allowing scalability as needs grow. The primary difference lies in Axway's higher investment with broad capabilities versus WSO2's lower cost with scalability benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Ranking in API Management
16th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
WSO2 API Manager
Ranking in API Management
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the API Management category, the mindshare of Axway AMPLIFY API Management is 1.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 API Manager is 4.9%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
API Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sudhanshu Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
We get stability, scalability, and security
Axway provides good documentation that newcomers can easily follow, but I believe the initial setup would be tough for someone new. Experienced employees know where everything is and how to do their job, so it would be difficult for a new hire to get up to speed. For an experienced person, I give the initial setup a ten out of ten. Deployment can be considered a hundred lines of code and some a thousand lines. For a simple deployment, it takes 10-15 seconds. And if the environment connectivity is good enough to respond and there is some heavy code that is being deployed, it takes around 30-60 seconds max, if we are referring to the cloud, where the connectivity for the long duration of the calls is there. The total deployment time is one minute to finish up. From the industrial point of view, Europe has a major chunk of users followed by, the US, and then Australia or the Asia-Pacific region.
Read full review
VishalSingh14 - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to deploy APIs and easy to manage CORS configuration
I have used WSO2 Store and WSO2 API Manager at the architecture level. I worked on two versions, namely WSO2 API Manager 2.6.0 and 5.7.0. I have also worked with WSO2 Identity Server versions 5.7 and 5.11. There are certain things that Apigee handles better than WSO2 API Manager. The user interface of WSO2 API Manager is much easier than that of Apigee. The scope of flexibility was much greater in Apigee. In WSO2 API Manager, we had little flexibility and were restricted to a specific software or tool. On the other hand, we had the scope of customization in Apigee.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."
"We like the portal for documentation a lot."
"There's drag and drop functionality so that you do not need to have a senior expert developer to make use of the tool. You can get more of your staff trained up to be able to use it as it's not overly technical."
"The administration tool for this solution is good."
"The API portal capability is a valuable feature."
"In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers."
"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."
"I don't believe the Salesforce has been fully utilized yet. It gives us quick engagement."
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management pros
"Functionality-wise, I like WSO2 API Manager - Publisher API and WSO2 Enterprise Service Bus."
"I think the best part about WSO2 API Manager is that it's highly customizable because it's open-source. The partnership model is quite lucrative for us, it helps us to go and pitch to our customers. You can build a lot of business models yourself that you want to use. You are able to do a lot of the solutions."
"Helped us to quickly publish our Microservice APIs and enforcing different policies against them, it comes up with features like Security, Throttling policy and it provides complete access to customize API's which actually saves development effort and time."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"WSO2 API Manager is open-source, which offers a range of features not found in other open-source API tools."
"It's very scalable, which is one of the best features."
"The most beneficial feature of WSO2 API Manager is its capability to use Swagger to define and then populate the API."
"WSO2 API Manager's most valuable features are the simple interface that is easy to use and the APIs lifecycle."
More WSO2 API Manager pros
 

Cons

"This solution does have some limitations regarding the deployment model."
"It would be great if they have an asset report. It's hard to get support for that."
"The product shows a lack of maturity. The setup is difficult, the tech support and community are lacking, and it is not very stable."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"Team management capabilities could be improved."
"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."
"Areas of improvement include marketing and enhancing the data products area by using ETIs."
"The API Mocking tools need to be improved."
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management cons
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
"WSO2 API Manager can be improved a lot relating to usability"
"The product hasn’t been updated for some time."
"The tool's commercial aspect could be improved. Pricing varies with partners, so selecting the appropriate pricing can be challenging."
"Based on our recent large scaling project, the latency needs to be improved."
"Basically, mTLS is a certificate-based communication protocol that WSO2 API Manager doesn't support."
"Dashboards for application monitoring of the APIs would be beneficial, allowing us to check for faulty APIs."
More WSO2 API Manager cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive. When you acquire a license you have full access to the solution, unlike other competitors such as Apigee X, where there are fragmented licenses. Some licenses only allow access to certain features while others allow access to more features. Upon procuring this solution's license, you will have full access to the solution, allowing you to experiment with all of its features."
"WSO2 API Manager is a low-cost solution. It is one of the most affordable solutions."
"The challenge is the increasing pricing, which has led some customers to consider alternatives, like using Spring Boot solutions instead. The rising costs, especially as cores and usage increase, have been a concern, prompting some to migrate to other products."
"The solution costs less than 20,000 euros a year. I'm not sure of the exact number."
"There is a subscription-based pricing structure and also the open-sourced version available."
"As far as I'm aware, the costs are not minimal but satisfactory."
"My previous company paid about 1.2 million dollars, and my current company pays about 300k. Both companies are at the enterprise level."
"For our projects, we found the pricing to be a little high."
"WSO2 API Manager is an open-source solution."
More WSO2 API Manager pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
18%
Insurance Company
8%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Axway AMPLIFY API Management?
In general, API governance provides a better experience for providers.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Axway AMPLIFY API Management?
The solution has a yearly subscription. The solution’s pricing is competitive. Axway makes a significant impression compared to its peers, especially with a sensitive budget. In many instances, it ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Axway AMPLIFY API Management?
Axway's queuing messages could be enhanced.
See all answers
What do you like most about WSO2 API Manager?
It is possible to scale up and scale down with the solution...I can say that I have not seen any issues related to scalability.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WSO2 API Manager?
We have encountered some concerns with concurrency. Our integrations do not handle high-volume transactions, and when benchmarking, some issues arose with concurrent testing. It is uncertain whethe...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for WSO2 API Manager?
We use WSO2 API Manager ( /products/wso2-api-manager-reviews ) to integrate our telecom products with third-party REST APIs. We are orchestrating services where our business process defines the int...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 21% of the time
Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Apigee vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 21% of the time
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Microsoft Azure API Management vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 16% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 11% of the time
Tyk vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management Logo
Tyk vs Axway AMPLIFY API Management
Compared 5% of the time
More Axway AMPLIFY API Management Competitors
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apigee vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 23% of the time
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Kong Gateway Enterprise vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 18% of the time
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Apache APISIX vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
Amazon API Gateway vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 12% of the time
SwaggerHub vs WSO2 API Manager Logo
SwaggerHub vs WSO2 API Manager
Compared 1% of the time
More WSO2 API Manager Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management
April 2025
Axway AMPLIFY API Management reportDownload Axway AMPLIFY API Management product report
Buyer's Guide
WSO2 API Manager
April 2025
WSO2 API Manager reportDownload WSO2 API Manager product report
 

Also Known As

Vordel Application Gateway, Axway API Management Plus, Axway API Management, AMPLIFY API Management
No data available
 

Overview

Axway API Management Plus combines API lifecycle management, secure integration services, monitoring and analytics to help you innovate faster and heighten ecosystem engagement. It is part of the Axway AMPLIFY data integration and engagement platform, which also includes unified app development for mobile to provide a complete solution for rapid change and innovation.

Axway

WSO2 API Manager is a comprehensive platform that allows organizations to design, publish, and manage APIs. 

It provides a centralized interface for API governance, security, and analytics. 

With features like API monetization and developer portal, it enables businesses to drive innovation and create new revenue streams.

WSO2
 

Sample Customers

Engie Group, Allianz
1. eBay 2. StubHub 3. Cisco 4. Verizon 5. T-Mobile 6. Vodafone 7. Orange 8. BT Group 9. Telstra 10. Deutsche Telekom 11. Swisscom 12. AT&T 13. Sprint 14. Telefonica 15. O2 16. British Airways 17. Lufthansa 18. Emirates 19. Qatar Airways 20. Etihad Airways 21. Air France 22. KLM 23. American Express 24. Visa 25. Mastercard 26. PayPal 27. Western Union 28. Citibank 29. HSBC 30. Barclays 31. Santander 32. Goldman Sachs
Buyer's Guide
Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager
April 2025
Free Report: Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager
Find out what your peers are saying about Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Axway AMPLIFY API Management vs. WSO2 API Manager report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.

We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.