We performed a comparison between Apigee and Axway AMPLIFY API Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."One of the best parts of this solution is the implementation as we did not need to use code or out-of-box policies. When it comes to the cloud-based architecture, there is a high level of reliability."
"It's easy to use and the security features are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is monetization."
"I'm still evaluating, but in terms of overall performance and stability, it's quite good."
"Great flexibility with its features."
"I use it because it's simple, it automatically updates, and It hasn't given me any issues."
"Apigee makes proxy management very simple."
"Apigee has proven to be one of the best of the breed."
"The best feature of Axway Amplify API Management is its exceptional level of security, which is highly reassuring, coupled with its remarkable capacity to handle substantial volumes of data in impressively efficient turnaround times."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is security."
"This platform can be highly scalable."
"They have an external developer platform that was a little bit painful."
"It would be good if the Apigee management allowed us to be able to consolidate many operations into single one for the gateway functionality."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"One feature they have to invest time into is the developer portal they use."
"The analytical aspect of it could be better. I think it is fair if Apigee lets you configure some of the metrics of the key details you want to monitor in terms of analytics."
"I would like to see the monitoring, dashboards, and reports improve."
"An area for improvement would be to provide more information while troubleshooting."
"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."
"In terms of customer service, the company needs to be easier to contact, and the support team needs to understand the situation and the product itself better."
"Sometimes we find bugs where certain calls are not returning all the data we need."
"The areas for enhancement should be improving certain filters within the solution. Although they are generally functional, there are occasional problems that could be more precisely adjusted. Additionally, the solution performs well within its workload limitations, but it may not be suitable for scaling up or managing a larger volume of transactions through the gateway. To address this, it may be necessary to adopt a unique architecture rather than relying on traditional pre-packaged options."
Apigee is ranked 1st in API Management with 39 reviews while Axway AMPLIFY API Management is ranked 12th in API Management with 3 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.0, while Axway AMPLIFY API Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Good automation and documentation with good performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Axway AMPLIFY API Management writes "We get stability, scalability, and security". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, IBM API Connect, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Postman, whereas Axway AMPLIFY API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Enterprise, Microsoft Azure API Management and Layer7 API Management. See our Apigee vs. Axway AMPLIFY API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
