In a small-scale company where I previously worked, cost-saving measures led to a transition from GitLab's dedicated servers to GitHub's cloud-based solution. This switch resulted in significant cost savings and demonstrated the impact of cloud technology adoption on budget management. However, my current organization, a larger enterprise with a substantial budget, focuses on reliability and functionality rather than cost alone. Therefore, while Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies, larger enterprises like mine prioritize tools like ServiceNow despite their expenses.
Technical lead at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-13T12:09:18Z
Mar 13, 2023
I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap, but I think it's reasonable. The free tiers don't include everything I needed. I like to keep things simple. There shouldn't be all these features that you need to pay more to get. For example, some Atlassian tools have separate licenses, but others belong to a single Atlassian account. It's a little confusing.
Vice President at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-06-14T08:03:00Z
Jun 14, 2020
We use it on the cloud. It's the latest and greatest. You don't have to pay for maintenance and you get automatic updates and hardware and backups and all that nice stuff. I paid a little premium for it, but you get a lot of benefits. Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on their website. They have a free version, a pro version and then they have an enterprise version. The Pro version is kind of the middle of the road for about $7 per user per month.
Automation Practice Leader at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-05-25T07:16:44Z
May 25, 2020
The price of Bitbucket is on the high side, but I think that's because of the tool's capability, which is justifiable. If you're purchasing for a smaller number of users then the license cost per user is definitely expensive, but if you buy a greater number of licenses, then it likely becomes a little cheaper. Atlassian is a very clever company. They sell the base product a little cheaper, and on top of that they sell many important plugins or add-ons which you need but which are also expensive. You might think you have a reasonably good deal but the base product will not have some of the important features and if you look at the final cost, it's a little expensive. But the tool has good capabilities and very good features not explored by many other Git based version controlling tools like GitLab or GitHub.
Chief Information Officer at a recruiting/HR firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
2020-01-22T12:44:00Z
Jan 22, 2020
We are using the minimum package with ten users and we are happy with the price because we are a small company. With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month. There are no fees in addition to this.
I don't know exactly what the program costs, but it depends on how many users you have. We recently upgraded from 50 to 100 users, and I think it's public on the website. I am not sure.
Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.
There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:
Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version...
In a small-scale company where I previously worked, cost-saving measures led to a transition from GitLab's dedicated servers to GitHub's cloud-based solution. This switch resulted in significant cost savings and demonstrated the impact of cloud technology adoption on budget management. However, my current organization, a larger enterprise with a substantial budget, focuses on reliability and functionality rather than cost alone. Therefore, while Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies, larger enterprises like mine prioritize tools like ServiceNow despite their expenses.
We find that the pricing is very affordable.
I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive. We pay about $500 or $600 a year for the Teams server.
Bitbucket is an inexpensive product.
A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket.
I did not pay for the license as I was using a corporate license. But I think the pricing is fair.
I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap, but I think it's reasonable. The free tiers don't include everything I needed. I like to keep things simple. There shouldn't be all these features that you need to pay more to get. For example, some Atlassian tools have separate licenses, but others belong to a single Atlassian account. It's a little confusing.
Bitbucket is a low-priced tool.
Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub.
When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan.
Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved. I rate pricing a six out of ten.
I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five.
I believe it's a monthly license subscription, but you get a discount for paying by the year, so I'd recommend that.
I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side.
We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket.
Unfortunately, I'm not privy to this information.
We use it on the cloud. It's the latest and greatest. You don't have to pay for maintenance and you get automatic updates and hardware and backups and all that nice stuff. I paid a little premium for it, but you get a lot of benefits. Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on their website. They have a free version, a pro version and then they have an enterprise version. The Pro version is kind of the middle of the road for about $7 per user per month.
The price of Bitbucket is on the high side, but I think that's because of the tool's capability, which is justifiable. If you're purchasing for a smaller number of users then the license cost per user is definitely expensive, but if you buy a greater number of licenses, then it likely becomes a little cheaper. Atlassian is a very clever company. They sell the base product a little cheaper, and on top of that they sell many important plugins or add-ons which you need but which are also expensive. You might think you have a reasonably good deal but the base product will not have some of the important features and if you look at the final cost, it's a little expensive. But the tool has good capabilities and very good features not explored by many other Git based version controlling tools like GitLab or GitHub.
We are using the minimum package with ten users and we are happy with the price because we are a small company. With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month. There are no fees in addition to this.
I don't know exactly what the program costs, but it depends on how many users you have. We recently upgraded from 50 to 100 users, and I think it's public on the website. I am not sure.