We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"It seems to be quite scalable."
"What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA."
"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"The product is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."
"The setup process is pretty simple."
"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."
"There is room for improvement in the workflow. Other similar tools offer automation and more streamlined workflows, which Bitbucket currently lacks."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already."
"The scalability for the cloud version can be improved."
"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."
"The price could be improved."
"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."
"It's not very user-friendly."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 35 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase and Surround SCM. See our Bitbucket vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.