Bitbucket vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Bitbucket and GitHub compete in version control and code repository management. GitHub has an upper hand due to its extensive community and integration capabilities, which make it a worthwhile investment.

Features: Bitbucket integrates well with Atlassian tools, offers branch permissions, and supports Git and SVN. GitHub has a large open-source community, superior third-party integration, and an advanced security feature.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket could improve its user interface, onboard more community plugins, and offer more scalability options. GitHub might enhance its customer support for enterprise clients, streamline its premium features, and reduce complexity for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket provides a seamless deployment with Atlassian tools and offers robust customer service. GitHub offers easy deployment processes with comprehensive documentation, gaining an edge over Bitbucket due to its straightforward user experience and vast support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket is competitively priced for small to mid-size teams, offering strong ROI through integrations. While GitHub has higher costs, it achieves higher ROI through extensive collaboration capabilities, making it more suitable for teams requiring advanced features and community involvement.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

Bitbucket vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 863,901 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket

Ranking in Version Control

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 31.3%, down from 34.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.9%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses

Director of Cloud Solution Group at DTech Cloud Corporation

Helps us improve our development workflows and enhance team collaboration

Our primary use case for Bitbucket revolves around version control and collaborative development. We utilize it extensively to manage our codebase, facilitate Git operations, and automate our CI/CD pipelines on the Bitbucket Cloud platform. This setup enables seamless collaboration among our team…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."

"It allows me to track the code from ten years back, which is incredibly useful when trying to understand certain implementations in a project."

"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."

"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."

"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."

"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"

"Bitbucket is an integral part of our CI/CD project."

"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."

More Bitbucket pros

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience."

"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."

"I would like to see the integration with some of the cloud service providers improved."

"The UI could be a little better compared to competing solutions."

"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."

"There could be more AI features included in the product."

"Bitbucket's usability and integration with other tools could be improved somewhat. My other issue is that Bitbucket, GitHub, GitLab, and all the other ones use slightly different jargon for the same things. They should come up with a standard language for all these tools."

"Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."

More Bitbucket cons

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"The product must document the CI/CD process more."

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate Bitbucket's pricing a five out of ten."

"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."

"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."

"I did not pay for the license as I was using a corporate license. But I think the pricing is fair."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."

"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."

"Bitbucket is an inexpensive product."

"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."

More Bitbucket pricing and cost advice

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"It’s an open-source solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

863,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?

It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?

Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket?

I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Bitbucket Server vs Bitbucket

Comparisons

Compared 61% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Bitbucket

Compared 4% of the time

Bamboo vs Bitbucket

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitbucket Competitors

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Bitbucket

Download Bitbucket product report

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.

There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:

Bitbucket Cloud is a web-based version of Bitbucket that is hosted on Atlassian's servers and accessible via a URL. Pipelines, an exclusive built-in CI/CD tool in Bitbucket Cloud, allows you to create, test, and deploy directly from Bitbucket.
Bitbucket Server is installed on your computer and runs in your environment. Bamboo, our robust CI/CD platform, has strong connections with Bitbucket Server, allowing you to totally automate your workflow. The license is unlimited.
Bitbucket Data Center appears to users as a single instance of Bitbucket Server, but it is actually hosted on a cluster of servers in your environment.

This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:

Availability: If one cluster node fails, the remaining cluster node(s) can continue to service requests, resulting in little or no downtime for customers.
Performance at scale: A cluster of numerous Bitbucket Server-running machines can manage more traffic than a single system.
Mirroring: For distributed teams working with large repositories, smart mirroring can increase Git clone performance.

Bitbucket Features

Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Workflow control: This helps you to enforce a project or team workflow.

Cooperation: Pull requests with inline commentary for code review cooperation.

Customization: If you don't find what you're looking for in our Marketplace, you can use our full Rest API to create unique features for your workflow.

Jira and Trello integration: Bring order to the chaos and keep the entire software company informed. Access to Jira issues and Trello cards' branches, build status, commits, and status.

Code collaboration: From concept to cloud, code collaboration is a must. Create a merging checklist with designated approvers and check for passing builds before transitioning Jira issues based on pull request status.

Consistent delivery: With built-in continuous delivery, you can build and test automatically. Build, test, and deploy with Bitbucket Pipelines, our integrated CI/CD solution. Benefit from code-based configuration and quick feedback loops.

Simple deployment: Keep track of your deployments, preview them, and confidently promote them.

Code security: You can rest easy knowing your code is safe on the cloud, and you can use checks to prevent errors from occurring.

Reviews from Real Users

Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”

Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."

Atlassian

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Bitbucket vs. GitHub