Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
94
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 32.8%, down from 34.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.5%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us improve our development workflows and enhance team collaboration
Our primary use case for Bitbucket revolves around version control and collaborative development. We utilize it extensively to manage our codebase, facilitate Git operations, and automate our CI/CD pipelines on the Bitbucket Cloud platform. This setup enables seamless collaboration among our team…
Pervez Roy - PeerSpot reviewer
Very good for collaboration on software projects
We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"The initial deployment is rather straightforward and only takes 30 minutes to an hour."
"I find Bitbucket's branching, pull requests, and branch mergers very valuable."
"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."
"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."
"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."
"This solution is just easy to use."
"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."
"The most valuable feature is the fact that it's cloud-based, and we don't have to manage an on-premises server to use it."
"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."
"There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git."
 

Cons

"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"There is room for improvement in the workflow. Other similar tools offer automation and more streamlined workflows, which Bitbucket currently lacks."
"Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"The scalability for the cloud version can be improved."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"The stability can be improved."
"We want to incorporate management comments within GitHub, making it more like a product management tool. We haven't done that yet. Another change we're considering is migrating from GitHub to Azure DevOps, especially now that Microsoft has introduced it."
"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."
"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."
"There could be more integration into Azure."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is an inexpensive product."
"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."
"The product is reasonably priced."
"The price of this solution is reasonable."
"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."
"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
32%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...
What needs improvement with GitHub?
There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.