Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 29.6%, down from 35.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 22.3%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us improve our development workflows and enhance team collaboration
Our primary use case for Bitbucket revolves around version control and collaborative development. We utilize it extensively to manage our codebase, facilitate Git operations, and automate our CI/CD pipelines on the Bitbucket Cloud platform. This setup enables seamless collaboration among our team…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its issue management."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is you can see the differences between the fresh code and the old code before you merge. Additionally, the solution is easy to use and well-integrated."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"It has a nice user experience to review PRs and provides great pipeline features, integrating well with other Atlassian products."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
"Our code is secure."
"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."
"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."
"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."
 

Cons

"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any."
"Bitbucket's stability isn't flawless. It has crashed on me occasionally, but I haven't yet lost anything after a crash."
"Bitbucket pipelines could be enhanced by adding scalability and caching."
"Although Bitbucket is scalable, there's always room for improvement in terms of scalability."
"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
"Bitbucket is an inexpensive product."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"I understand Bitbucket's cost is on the higher side."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.