Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 33.8%, up from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 25.9%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Prathamesh DMarathe - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless collaboration and merge conflict resolution improve code management
I use the Bitbucket tool to store the code repository and maintain a CI/CD pipeline, allowing multiple developers to work on different code branches. We can integrate with the developer Marathe bridge branch, enabling it to be pushed into the production environment within the CI/CD.  I use…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Bitbucket works, and it's reliable"
"The initial deployment is rather straightforward and only takes 30 minutes to an hour."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"Bitbucket has a pull request-based method, similar to Git's merge request feature."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
 

Cons

"Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already."
"One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"In Bitbucket, manual processes are needed to handle changes between repositories."
"Bitbucket should come with code review pre-integrated, which would be better than integrating another tool into the solution."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."
"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.