Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 31.3%, down from 34.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 23.6%, down from 26.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Cuneyt-Gurses - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps us improve our development workflows and enhance team collaboration
Our primary use case for Bitbucket revolves around version control and collaborative development. We utilize it extensively to manage our codebase, facilitate Git operations, and automate our CI/CD pipelines on the Bitbucket Cloud platform. This setup enables seamless collaboration among our team…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"The tool helps us manage different versions of code and branches. I like that Bitbucket is similar to Git but may have some vendor support. It has many of the same features as Git."
"What I liked the most about this program is that it integrates seamlessly with JIRA."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"The planning model is good, and so is the suite of applications around it."
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."
"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."
"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."
 

Cons

"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"Bitbucket's Initial setup is a little complicated because you need to install and configure the solution. It can take one or two days to deploy Bitbucket. If you have a high workload, you can deploy it on multiple server farms as needed"
"Could provide some default branching options for users to adopt."
"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"Although Bitbucket is scalable, there's always room for improvement in terms of scalability."
"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."
"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."
"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is an inexpensive product."
"I rate the product price as two on a scale of one to ten, where ten means that it is a very expensive tool."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
21%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.