Automic Automation vs CA Server Automation comparison

The compared Automic Automation and CA Server Automation solutions aren't in the same category. Automic Automation is ranked #2 in WA , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 6.1% mindshare in the category. CA Server Automation is ranked #2 in CP , and holds a 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Automic Automation users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CA Server Automation users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Automation and CA Server Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, JAMS Software and others in Workload Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,667 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JAMS

Mindshare comparison

Workload Automation Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Automic Automation	6.1%
Control-M	13.8%
AutoSys Workload Automation	7.7%
Other	72.4%

Workload Automation

Cluster Provisioning Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CA Server Automation	12.0%
NVIDIA Base Command Manager	31.3%
Lenovo XClarity Provisioning Manager	8.5%
Other	48.2%

Cluster Provisioning

Featured Reviews

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Has streamlined complex job scheduling across scripting languages while reducing manual effort

JAMS could be improved with a web client that is accessible and as fast as a normal website, eliminating the need to RDP to the servers to access the JAMS client. A functionality running on the JAMS server to continuously check the JAMS agents would ensure they are working properly. If an agent is not responding, a feature to restart the service from the job server machine would be beneficial. The upgrade process, particularly when switching from V6 to V7, could be clearer in terms of documentation, ideally with screenshots showing exactly what needs to be done on each screen.

Read full review

Peter Grundler

Senior Consultant at Tricise

Helps to move away from manual tasks and offers wide platform support and web-based interface

Customers want to move away from manual monitoring and checking processes. Automating these processes helps in time-saving and reduces human error. When you automate business processes, it reduces mistakes. It eliminates the risk of manual errors such as typos. There is a 20% to 30% reduction in human error. It fulfills all the needs when it comes to visibility and control across various operating platforms. It is the perfect product for managing processes that span multiple operating platforms. Automic Automation has the widest platform support compared to other products, such as Control-M, Tivoli from IBM, or Stonebranch. It definitely helps with compliance processes. We have had a lot of customers for two years with a focus on compliance, and it works. They were successful. Due to the fact that our customers can automate a lot of things, it reduces operating costs. It is hard to give a number because the savings are different for each customer. If a customer never had any automation, there could be about 80% savings after implementing Automic Automation, whereas for a customer who already has automated tasks, the difference will be less by adding Automic Automation. They might see 5% to 10% more savings. Automic Automation helps improve our ability to meet SLAs. In the recent versions, SLA management has been integrated, which previously was an external component. Because a lot of customers used it and asked Broadcom to implement SLA management into the workload engine, Broadcom included it. We see more and more customers running their SLA management via the Automic Automation product.

Read full review

Sapana Patil

IT Consultant at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A quick input response and useful real-time logs but reports require manual scripting

Our company uses the solution to batch schedule movements from one server to another for our customers. We currently have 1,000 jobs being performed by the solution such as getting services, transferring and migrating files, and generating reports. The option to run jobs manually or…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like how you can add new execution methods on the fly. It isn't overly complex to add Python script support to an execution method in the JAMS system. The scheduling is excellent. You can schedule a maintenance window and take that resource unit out of everything. It halts all of the jobs."

"We also use the solution’s Interactive Agents. If we need to push something to our dealer portal, we can just drop a file in a folder and it goes. Running interactive tasks helps me users focus on business processes since I don’t have to take care of running the jobs manually."

"The planning capabilities are most valuable."

"The fact that we no longer need to use Excel spreadsheets is huge."

"It has definitely drastically improved our capabilities to scale our automation. Before JAMS, there were a lot of manual processes. We had a couple of operators who spent all day doing that. A lot of the time with human intervention and human processes, it is as good as the person who may be following a procedure and human error is a big problem."

"It's a full-featured job scheduling tool. The part that I liked the best was the support team. This tool was new, and we were all learning it and setting up the different jobs that were complex in nature. Their support team was very responsive in helping us out through the setup and resolving the issues. They have been incredibly awesome."

"The built-in triggers are great."

"The most valuable feature is the easily accessible data in the database because we run a lot of SQL scripting against the database."

More JAMS pros

"The two main things about it are its versatility and stability."

"We do not have to use a broad variety of agents to connect to different types of systems."

"The scheduling feature is very user-friendly."

"Both the stability and the scalability of Automic Workload Automation are great."

"The file transfer feature is the most valuable for process automation, as many organizations rely heavily on data transfer."

"You can create very fine, granular workflows with a lot of possibilities. It gives you the possibility to do things in many ways."

"Automic Automation is very powerful and can satisfy all needs."

"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the tool. With a little bit of time and understanding, it is capable of completing any business use case we have encountered. There are many ways to achieve desired results without much issue."

More Automic Automation pros

"The solution provides good security for firewalls in the banking industry."

"The option to run jobs manually or automatically is useful."

Cons

"I would like a simple web interface that I could give to my team to go in and kill jobs or see why jobs died so that we don't have to drill down deeper into the application and know everything about it. It would be good to have a really clean web engine that would say here are the jobs running. We can then click to see the time running and whether any of them fails and other similar things. I know they have one, but it's not very simplistic."

"JAMS has built-in reporting. I've never really used it. I tried using it a few years ago and I couldn't figure it out. It was wonky. It could be improved upon."

"The documentation is not super... It's not as quick and slick as I'd like it to be."

"The UI is completely unintuitive. We had to go and open up a support ticket with JAMS just to get something back."

"The JAMS automation code isn't so clean."

"The solution is good, it's reliable. But sometimes the UI is not the most responsive I've ever used."

"One issue which can prevent jobs from running is when a script gets into a loop."

"If there were a softcover book on how to really take advantage of all of JAMS' tools, I would buy it. I do better with training books than online searching, so a book would be helpful."

More JAMS cons

"We have some problems with updates where some functions are changed, so you have to check your whole system to see if everything is still running."

"In case we run into performance issues, it is sometimes hard to find out what is the real cause for it."

"Recent changes in Broadcom's licensing model are making some customers reduce tasks or replace Automic Automation. This is something Broadcom should consider."

"Better escalation process for alert notifications. When there's an error or a problem, the automation part of it could be easily programmed to escalate it up to the developers or whoever is going to work on it."

"We occasionally encounter bugs when applying new agent versions, patches, or updates to Automic."

"The user interface has room for improvement."

"On a scale of one to 10, I would say, probably a seven. We have had some issues recently going through the process of trying to upgrade from version 10 to 12."

"The forecast and long-term planning could be made a little better when you work with it in the future."

More Automic Automation cons

"Reports cannot be generated manually or without running a job."

"Creating new jobs can be cumbersome because reports have to be scripted manually."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are no additional costs other than the license for Fortra's JAMS which is affordable."

"Definitely check how many single processes you want to run and count them as jobs. That is how you would work out your pricing on JAMS. For example, if you're running a number of commands and you can put them all into one script and run that script, you can count that as one job."

"JAMS is priced competitively compared to similar solutions and offers flexible licensing options to cater to user needs."

"The product is reasonably priced, and we don't have any add-ons."

"It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year."

"Take advantage of its scalability. You can start small. The initial cost is very reasonable. Once you have started picking up the tool and adopting it, then you can scale up from there and buy more agents."

"It's certainly a lot cheaper than Tivoli and Control-M. In comparison to them, you get a lot more bang for your buck. You get pretty much the whole functionality and more, in some cases, when compared to Control-M, but at a fraction of the price."

"This is a good product at a fair price."

More JAMS pricing and cost advice

"Automatic is heavily integrated in our organization. The cost to change would be a huge factor for us, and we have not found any other product that is better out there."

"The pricing keeps going up, which is concerning."

"We have received a lot of time and cost efficiencies from using the product."

"There are a lot of new features, but we do not use them because they are too expensive. The price point could be less."

"Certain licenses can be a bit expensive. The PeopleSoft agents, in particular, are a bit pricey."

"Our company had paid around 5,000 to 6,000 USD per license for a month."

"This is a support system for us, not our core business, so we purchased this product inexpensively."

"Initially, the pricing was competitive but consistently, year over year, its pricing has become more erratic. It increases to the point where even with the positives, it starts to become a longer-term question about how it will fit into the environment."

More Automic Automation pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	67

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JAMS?

I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

My thoughts on the pricing of JAMS are that I won't say it is cheap, but it is cost-efficient, and that should be acc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

An area that has room for improvement is related to the AWS RDS and database part, where they said that is in progres...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload Automation?

The pricing was client-wise, but they are changing it to execution-wise pricing. So, we are in negotiation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?

Automic Automation has some disadvantages; it is more simplified, and sometimes it can be complicated. The technical ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Automic Workload Automation?

I have been dealing with Automic Automation for probably around ten years. I have been both a partner with Automic, w...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs JAMS

Compared 13% of the time

Stonebranch vs JAMS

Compared 9% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs JAMS

Compared 8% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMS

Compared 8% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs JAMS

Compared 6% of the time

More JAMS Competitors

Control-M vs Automic Automation

Compared 16% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Automic Automation

Compared 13% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Dollar Universe Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 5% of the time

HCL Workload Automation vs Automic Automation

Compared 2% of the time

More Automic Automation Competitors

Galera Cluster vs CA Server Automation

Compared 100% of the time

More CA Server Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS

March 2026

Download JAMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Automic Automation

March 2026

Download Automic Automation product report

No data available

Also Known As

No data available

Automic Dollar Universe

Server Automation

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

Demo not available

Broadcom

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.

Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.

What are JAMS's key features?

Automation & Scheduling: Flexible automation helps manage complex job schedules efficiently.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with platforms like SQL Server, SAP, and Python for diverse applications.
Centralized Job Management: A unified interface for handling thousands of jobs daily.
Dependency Management: Supports complex workflows with efficient dependency tracking.
Insightful Logging: Provides detailed logs and notifications for precise task execution.

What benefits should users look for in JAMS reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.
Scalability: Flexible licensing models grow with business size and needs.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Streamlines job orchestration across environments.
Responsive Support: Helps ensure smooth operations with quick troubleshooting.

In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.

JAMS Software

Automic Automation offers a web-based GUI for high scalability and flexibility, integrating with platforms like SAP and Oracle. It promotes efficient process automation and supports multiple OS environments, benefiting diverse industries with its robust predictive capabilities.

Automic Automation facilitates process automation and workload management, providing valuable integration with applications like SAP and Oracle. It supports a wide range of operating systems and environments, enabling seamless workflow automation. It features a web-based interface accessible across devices, ensuring scalability and flexibility for complex job automation. Users find its predictive capabilities and platform support instrumental in enhancing operations, although improvements are noted in reporting, cloud integration, and documentation. Licensing and pricing structures also present room for optimization, along with workflow dependency management and smoother upgrade paths.

What are the key features of Automic Automation?

Web-based GUI: Accessible on any device, enhancing user convenience
Application Integration: Supports SAP, Oracle, and others for robust workflows
Comprehensive Scripting: Allows detailed automation customization
Process Automation: Powers efficient and complex job automation
Scalability and Flexibility: Expands across various platforms and environments

What benefits and ROI should users expect from Automic Automation?

Improved Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks and streamlines processes
Extensive Platform Support: Cost-effective management of different systems
Predictive Capabilities: Enhances operational decision-making
Robust Integration: Harmonizes with diverse applications, aiding business functions

Automic Automation sees implementation in industries like banking, finance, and telecommunications, where it automates ERP systems, schedules batch jobs, integrates workloads, and manages file transfers. By supporting SAP, Oracle, and ETL tasks, it aids efficiency and workload automation across varied environments including cloud and mainframe systems.

Broadcom

CA Server Automation is an integrated solution that automates provisioning, patching, and configuration of operating systems, storage resources and application components across physical, virtual and public cloud systems.

This comprehensive solution integrates and automates provisioning processes, standardizes configurations, and simplifies workflows to successfully manage the complexity of continuously changing virtualized environments.

Accelerate application deployment
Streamline service provisioning
Improve server utilization
Build elasticity and improve operational efficiency

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB

HCL Technologies, Logicalis, UOLDIVEO

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, JAMS Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.