Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppVerify vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (40th), Regression Testing Tools (24th)
OpenText Silk Central
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
2.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (11th), Test Design Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Automai AppVerify is designed for Regression Testing Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.6%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
OpenText Silk Central, on the other hand, focuses on Test Management Tools, holds 2.7% mindshare, up 1.4% since last year.
Regression Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Automai AppVerify0.6%
Tricentis Tosca22.5%
OpenText Functional Testing11.7%
Other65.2%
Regression Testing Tools
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Silk Central2.7%
OpenText Application Quality Management8.2%
Tricentis qTest8.1%
Other81.0%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?
Leave a review
ChrisWilliams1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Analyst at Kainga Ora
Reporting efficacy and collaboration improve despite outdated features
I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support, so we will have to move to something else, but I do not know what the other solution will be. Automation is quite immature at our place. It has only really started, so there is no integration with OpenText Silk Central. I would give it a rating of 7 out of 10; it could be 7.5. It just lacks certain features that would make it a higher grade if it had more modern features.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What needs improvement with OpenText Silk Central?
It can be a bit slow sometimes, and it has not got some of the modern features many of the other competitors have. I am talking about features such as traceability matrix; it is designed more for W...
What is your primary use case for OpenText Silk Central?
I could leave my opinion on some ALM that I have been working with lately. Recently, I have been working with Silk, Azure DevOps, but in the past, I have worked with ALM, QC, and all that kind of s...
What advice do you have for others considering OpenText Silk Central?
I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support,...
 

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify
Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, OpenText and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: January 2026.
881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.