Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Automai AppVerify vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

Automai Corporation and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. Automai Corporation is ranked #38, while SmartBear is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3. Automai Corporation holds a 0.1% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution.
Automai AppVerify
  • 134 Views
  • 51 Comparison Views
ReadyAPI Test
Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews
  • 323 Views
  • 132 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Automai AppVerify and ReadyAPI Test based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,957 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Automai AppVerify
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
38th
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
25th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ReadyAPI Test
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
21st
Ranking in Regression Testing Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
API Testing Tools (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Automai AppVerify is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Automai AppVerify?
Share your opinion
Luis Sanchez - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
23%
Insurance Company
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SoapUI Pro?
The product allows us to uncover any potential issues early on.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SoapUI Pro?
ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SoapUI Pro?
ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would b...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Postman vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Postman vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 71% of the time
Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 8% of the time
ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
ReadyAPI vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 6% of the time
Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
Katalon Studio vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 5% of the time
IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test Logo
IBM Rational Test Workbench vs ReadyAPI Test
Compared 5% of the time
More ReadyAPI Test Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Regression Testing Tools
June 2025
Automai AppVerify reportDownload Automai AppVerify product report
Buyer's Guide
ReadyAPI Test
June 2025
ReadyAPI Test reportDownload ReadyAPI Test product report
 

Also Known As

AppVerify, NRG Global AppVerify
SoapUI NG Pro
 

Overview

Continuous Regression Testing for Agile, DevOps, and Continuous Delivery teams. A solution to test any of your applications from the user standpoint. Scripts are created without writing a line of code. Streamline your testing processes and be assured all changes are verified. Get a free POC here: https://www.nrgglobal.com/application-performance-monitoring-appswatch/
Automai Corporation
For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.
SmartBear
 

Sample Customers

Cap Gemini
Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
May 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, UiPath and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,957 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.