OpenText Application Quality Management and OpenText Silk Central compete in test management and quality assurance. OpenText Silk Central has the edge due to its advanced features and integration options.
Features: OpenText Application Quality Management provides robust test management, defect tracking, and integration with popular development tools. It is known for detailed reporting capabilities. OpenText Silk Central offers comprehensive test management features, cross-browser testing, and powerful analytics. It is preferred for its rich integration possibilities and flexibility in test execution.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Application Quality Management could improve in enhancing ease of deployment and broadening integration capabilities. Additionally, the platform may benefit from a more user-friendly interface and better scalability for larger enterprises. OpenText Silk Central might look to streamline its analytics tools, improve customer support responsiveness, and reduce the complexity of its setup process for smaller teams.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central is noted for a streamlined deployment process and flexible configuration options, often praised for proactive customer service. In contrast, OpenText Application Quality Management offers a straightforward deployment with strong support channels but may require more time for full implementation.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Application Quality Management features competitive pricing with a reasonable initial setup cost and positive ROI from its pricing structure. OpenText Silk Central has a higher initial cost but delivers significant ROI due to its advanced features and capabilities, justifying its price over time.
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
