Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

Broadcom and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #20. Broadcom holds a 3.2% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 21 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 695 Views
  • 361 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Silk Central
Read 10 OpenText Silk Central reviews
  • 290 Views
  • 290 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are both prominent tools for requirements management and testing. Users report greater satisfaction with OpenText Silk Central's feature set and cost-effectiveness, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is valued for its comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Silk Central is highly praised for its robust test management features, user-friendly navigation, and efficient execution tracking. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer stands out with its in-depth modeling, automation functionalities, and extensive requirement coverage.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central could benefit from enhanced reporting tools, better integration with other platforms, and modernized user interface design. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer users suggest more streamlined updates, reduced system resource usage, and improved speed of operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, ensuring minimal downtime. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has a more complex setup but offers detailed documentation and proactive support teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central offers competitive pricing with solid ROI due to its efficient test management capabilities. Comparatively, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, though more expensive, justifies the additional investment by delivering high ROI through extensive features and automation benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,497 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.0
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer boosts efficiency, reduces costs and defects, accelerates delivery, and integrates seamlessly, improving ROI and productivity.
Sentiment score
1.0
OpenText Silk Central enhances test management, project visibility, and collaboration, leading to reduced costs, faster delivery, and higher productivity.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.7
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's support is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, though some experience delays and inconsistent expertise.
Sentiment score
6.3
OpenText Silk Central is praised for its responsive, knowledgeable customer service, efficient technical support, and quick response times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.1
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer excels in scalability, supporting projects efficiently with minor initial adjustments despite some Kubernetes concerns.
Sentiment score
1.0
OpenText Silk Central is praised for scalability, flexibility, robust performance, supporting diverse projects, extensive collaboration, and seamless system integration.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is stable and reliable, with strong support and addressed issues, highly rated by users.
Sentiment score
1.0
OpenText Silk Central is reliable, handles extensive workloads, scales with business growth, and provides stable performance with minimal downtime.
 

Room For Improvement

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer needs UI improvements, better integration, workflow simplification, enhanced security, and modernized graphics for efficiency.
Users suggest improvements for OpenText Silk Central in reporting, integration, setup, test environment support, performance, and navigation.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer report
It is designed more for Waterfall than Agile, so it is not as efficient as it could be.
For more quotes and insights, download the OpenText Silk Central report
 

Setup Cost

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer's pricing varies by team size, with enterprise agreements recommended for large groups to manage costs.
<p>OpenText Silk Central provides enterprise pricing options, balancing initial costs with comprehensive features, support, and significant return on investment.</p>
 

Valuable Features

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer enhances testing efficiency with automation, seamless integration, data management, and workflow optimization for engineers.
OpenText Silk Central excels in test management, tool integration, reporting, ease of use, customization, automation, and effective large-scale test case management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
8th
Ranking in Test Design Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (7th)
OpenText Silk Central
Ranking in Test Management Tools
20th
Ranking in Test Design Automation
5th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
2.3
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.2%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer3.2%
OpenText Silk Central1.7%
Other95.1%
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Hosney Osman - PeerSpot reviewer
Integration capabilities enhance testing and workflow automation
I rate Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer as 8 out of 10. It will be very nice if Broadcom has questions or comments related to my review and can reach me via email to clarify something. I want to be a reference for Broadcom. I don't have any information regarding the visual modeling function specifically. I'm not dealing with modeling requirements or generating optimized test cases in Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer. Broadcom takes a lot of information from us as end-users, and they provide fixes within two to five days maximum. My team has raised many enhancement requests and discussed them with Broadcom, and they are adding some of these features to the product itself. I look forward to receiving an email regarding these reviews, and I can add anything later if I forgot something, earning some points for this contribution on the website.
Read full review
ChrisWilliams1 - PeerSpot reviewer
Reporting efficacy and collaboration improve despite outdated features
I do this for my own benefit, and it has nothing to do with any company views. I work as a permanent employee for a government department. OpenText Silk Central is coming to the end of its support, so we will have to move to something else, but I do not know what the other solution will be. Automation is quite immature at our place. It has only really started, so there is no integration with OpenText Silk Central. I would give it a rating of 7 out of 10; it could be 7.5. It just lacks certain features that would make it a higher grade if it had more modern features.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
11%
Manufacturing Company
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise21
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
It's not affordable; it's very expensive. It would be suitable only for large customers, and a large customer will think twice before making a deal with Broadcom.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
Integration with AI is an area that needs to be improved quickly. To be clear, this relates to how to use AI to improve use cases, break down applications, and review designs, as this area needs to...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?
This solution saves a lot of time in the software testing cycle because, with Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer specifically, I am doing a flowchart, and I can extract test cases and use cases t...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Blueprint Storyteller vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 37% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 24% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 21% of the time
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 19% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Silk Central Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Silk Central
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Silk Central Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
September 2025
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
August 2025
OpenText Silk Central reportDownload OpenText Silk Central product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
August 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,497 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.