Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs OpenText Silk Central comparison

Broadcom and OpenText are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Broadcom is ranked #13, while OpenText is ranked #21. Broadcom holds a 3.3% mindshare in TMT, compared to OpenText’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Read 20 Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reviews
  • 356 Views
  • 162 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
OpenText Silk Central
Read 9 OpenText Silk Central reviews
  • 269 Views
  • 64 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

OpenText Silk Central and Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer are both prominent tools for requirements management and testing. Users report greater satisfaction with OpenText Silk Central's feature set and cost-effectiveness, while Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is valued for its comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Silk Central is highly praised for its robust test management features, user-friendly navigation, and efficient execution tracking. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer stands out with its in-depth modeling, automation functionalities, and extensive requirement coverage.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central could benefit from enhanced reporting tools, better integration with other platforms, and modernized user interface design. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer users suggest more streamlined updates, reduced system resource usage, and improved speed of operations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, ensuring minimal downtime. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer has a more complex setup but offers detailed documentation and proactive support teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central offers competitive pricing with solid ROI due to its efficient test management capabilities. Comparatively, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer, though more expensive, justifies the additional investment by delivering high ROI through extensive features and automation benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central Report (Updated: May 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
May 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom Agile Requirements...
Ranking in Test Management Tools
13th
Ranking in Test Design Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (11th)
OpenText Silk Central
Ranking in Test Management Tools
21st
Ranking in Test Design Automation
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is 3.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Silk Central is 1.6%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Management Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Gireesh Subramonian - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps the development team to finish tasks within the required timeframe
The team I am working with was never into Agile before. We have a daily scrum-call and before that, we have to define all the tasks that we are going to work on for a number of sprints. For example, there is a Product Increment Planning meeting where we put all the user requirements into the product backlog. Then we put them back to the respective sprints. A product increment consists of about five iterations, or five sprints. And we pull each of these backlog items to these particular sprints or iterations, so that it is easy for the development team to pick up, based on the priority. The backlog is set, and it is pulled into particular sprints, based on business priority. So it helps the development team to take up and finish tasks within the required timeframe. It helps in productivity, traceability, and saves time.
Read full review
it_user685080 - PeerSpot reviewer
A powerful platform and strong technical support help us to make the right decisions
We are primarily interested in improving the flexibility to customize parts of the tool. At this point, we feel that the customization is bad. For example, we would like to be able to automatize internal projects. We would like like to see the visibility improved, and want to perform certain tests faster. We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end. This is very important to us. In terms of usability and the interface, a few small improvements can lead to a lot of benefits. The interface is good but can be improved. The section on managing requirements for testing has to be improved. This is an old feature that has not been updated at the same rate as the rest of the tool.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It gives us an idea of creating the visual diagrams, which are quite easy to use. It is helpful in creating our business processes."
"The ability to create models/diagrams at multiple levels (nest/embed them) helps in taking models from high-level business requirements and building them into detailed requirements models and test models. Plus, it helps reuse lower level models. It also allows maintaining models at appropriate levels, even for very complex systems/solutions."
"In terms of meeting business challenges, it helped to shorten the dev/testing cycle by identifying requirements gaps early in the process, by having models shared within the development team. It helped increase test coverage and reduce the number of issues experienced by clients/customers."
"The optimization technique helps in giving us the minimum number of test cases with maximum coverage."
"It helped us to move from manual testing to automation testing."
"​The scale possibilities are endless, especially when combined with all the other products that CA has to offer."
"The support that we get from Broadcom is great."
"Technical support is excellent. They provide solutions quickly for issues encountered."
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer pros
"The stability of this solution is very good. In our experience it is approximately ninety-nine percent."
 

Cons

"Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around."
"The solution could be more user-friendly. For example, attachments could be icon-based to make it easier for the user to notice them."
"They do not have an engine to house test scripts to really pull together the testing pieces of it."
"CA ARD doesn't provide integration with Tosca. The possibility of creating a test case and exporting it into Tosca is not available. Integration with end-to-end automation tools, like Worksoft or Tosca, is not provided by CA ARD as of now."
"At present, there is no option for test data parameters from ARD for virtual databases. We have to create them in TDM and push them as well. Virtual database connectivity needs to be improved. They need to come up with some areas where they can create synthetic data parameters easily from the test cases that have been designed."
"The solution could improve security and authentication."
"I think it's already coming, but it needs more automation aspects. There is a tab for Automation, but I think it's not robust. I think that it's going to be a crucial element of the tool."
"Data flexibility is something which I would like to see, along with more integration with App Test."
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer cons
"We would also like to manage the integration testing end-to-end."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"At present, Broadcom works through partners rather than dealing directly with the consumer. When there are discounts given, it's up to the partner as to whether they want to give that discount to the customer. Sometimes, the partners decide to take the discount themselves. Pricewise, I would give ARD's price a rating of three out of five."
"It is less costly when compared to other tools on the market."
"Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."
"This tool reduces the cost associated with test cases, automation script generation, and maintenance costs."
"We were able to scale down some resources to basically self-fund our ability to purchase the tool."
"​The cost of the tool was well worth the benefit that we saw on the back-end."
"The pricing model is based on how many people are using it. We have an annual license. There are not any additional costs."
"The cost of this tool, in terms of licensing, is not large."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Energy/Utilities Company
27%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Comparisons

IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
IBM DOORS vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 35% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 35% of the time
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Logo
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
Compared 30% of the time
More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Competitors
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Silk Central Logo
OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText Silk Central
Compared 100% of the time
More OpenText Silk Central Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
June 2025
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer reportDownload Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer product report
Buyer's Guide
Test Management Tools
June 2025
OpenText Silk Central reportDownload OpenText Silk Central product report
 

Also Known As

Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
Micro Focus Silk Central, Borland Silk Central, Silk Central
 

Overview

CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.
Broadcom
Silk Central is an open test management solution which unifies all test assets into one easy-to-use planning, tracking, reporting and execution hub. Silk Central enables you to gain control, collaboration and traceability across all areas of your software testing, whether your methodology is Agile, Traditional or hybrid. Silk Central provides integration of requirements, manual and automated tests, defect tools and your test execution, giving full traceability of the quality of your software testing regardless of role.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

Williams, Rabobank
AmBank Group, Krung Thai Computer Services, Deakin University
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
May 2025
Free Report: Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. OpenText Silk Central report.
See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.