

OpenText Silk Central and TestRail are prominent software testing management tools. Users tend to prefer TestRail based on its overall features and value for price, although OpenText Silk Central excels in some areas.
Features: OpenText Silk Central offers comprehensive test management capabilities, integration with other OpenText products, and strong reporting features. TestRail provides user-friendly navigation, extensive customization options, and powerful reporting tools.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Central needs better integration with third-party tools, improved performance speed, and a more intuitive user interface. TestRail could enhance its email notifications, offer more detailed analytics, and improve mobile accessibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Central's deployment process is smooth but requires more configuration time. Customer service is reliable but slow. TestRail features quick and easy deployment with minimal setup time. Customer service is highly responsive and helpful.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Central has higher initial setup costs but offers good ROI over time. TestRail provides a more affordable setup cost and quicker return on investment due to its lower pricing and efficient functionality.
Time-wise, it saves about fifteen to twenty percent compared to Excel, and money-wise, it's around ten percent.
Sometimes, you really need to speak to a person, and arranging such calls is not easy.
I personally escalate Leapwork issues with the Leapwork support tech team, and they are very quick to solve problems.
Just today we had a hiccup where it didn't want to integrate with Jira.
When I started automation testing in my current company, we only had 10-20 automated test cases integrated with TestRail, but we gradually increased to 100, 200, 1000, and 2000 cases.
It also doesn't have the analytics and dashboards that you need for large scale enterprise implementations, which is why it's not really scalable.
I have never experienced any issues with its scalability.
It has never had any issues.
I would say seven or an eight because sometimes there are hiccups in the interface with Jira, for example.
It is designed more for Waterfall than Agile, so it is not as efficient as it could be.
If you want to use TestRail for enterprise-level waterfall projects with traditional reporting and a lot of analytics, it's not good enough because the analytics, dashboards, and reporting are not really there.
I would appreciate AI features that help design test cases based on documented requirements.
It offers good value for money.
The reporting is probably the most valuable feature.
The integration with Jira is good. I like that because it helps to show your test results and helps you to keep traceability between your user stories and your test results.
It significantly saves effort in managing test execution and managing all test cases.
The reporting capabilities and the simplicity of it make it user-friendly, as new users can easily understand the tool.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| TestRail | 8.7% |
| OpenText Silk Central | 2.1% |
| Other | 89.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.
Easily track and follow the status of individual tests, milestones and projects with dashboards and activity reports. Get real-time insights into your testing progress and boost productivity with personalized todo lists, filters and email notifications. Efficient test management, get started today!
We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.