No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

AuraQuantic vs CA Process Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Process Automation
17th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (17th), Low-Code Development Platforms (21st), No-Code Development Platforms (9th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (15th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (22nd)
CA Process Automation
Ranking in Process Automation
37th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CA Process Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
AuraQuantic1.4%
CA Process Automation1.0%
Other97.6%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer at Banco de Guatemala
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.
SJ
Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies
Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience
We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests.  Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a low-code application."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal provides several solutions embedded into one single platform that provides unbroken services to resolve almost any type of process for almost any industry segment."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"I chose AuraPortal due to its capabilities for implementing BPM solutions with limited programming skills, as interfaces can be developed very fast and the cycle time for developing applications or integration between different systems can be improved by 70-80%."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible; it's really interesting for me, and I'm focusing on this application and BPM because it's really complete."
"AuraPortal is a beautiful solution for any company because you can do everything you want."
"Technical support is unequivocally excellent; in fact, the best customer service and technical support I’ve experienced during my 12 years in IT."
"We took our server provisioning process from about 30 days to about 4 days on the first iteration of implementation."
"PAM has the ability to integrate and build solutions that work well in CA's suite of service management products and those that are outside of service management."
"Before implementing this product, our Problem and Change Management Processes were very poor, but nowadays, thanks to CA Process Automation (PAM), we no longer have this problem, as we now have all of the processes' rules placed inside of it."
"The value lies in just being able to automate things such that there's less human interaction and, therefore, more consistency in our automations."
"CA Process Automation manager is a very powerful production tool."
"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."
"For our use it really does very well; it provides us exactly what we need, and it runs with low-resource utilization and moves quickly."
 

Cons

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
"There should be a more affordable consulting pricing."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"I would like to see support for Unix, Oracle and other RDBMS."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"Better reporting, because we have to true up our licenses every three months because we license on running concurrent processes, so we have to provide a report to CA every three months using their tool -- which never works."
"CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing."
"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."
"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."
"The solution engine is in Java. Regardless of developments, the solution will always be limited to what Java offers."
"A lot of times they don't get resolved, but I'm okay with those kind of responses sometimes."
"Although it's drag-and-drop, there's a little bit of a learning curve to use it correctly."
"It’s very complex, which is one of the disadvantages."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
7%
Construction Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Performing Arts
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise10
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA IT Process Automation Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. CA Process Automation and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.