We performed a comparison between Appian and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a stable product."
"Appian's most valuable feature is that we can create end-to-end process workflows with minimum turnaround."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"Appian's most valuable features are the quick time it takes to develop for the market. It's easy and faster than other BPM solutions."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"There is a version coming out every six months with performance improvements."
"It reduces development time in half making us more efficient."
"Call Web Service Smart Service - Web service integrations with other systems are super simple and fast to create, supported by low code menus."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"Appian has a few areas for improvement, which my organization raised with the Appian team. One is the Excel output which is limited to fifty columns when it should be up to two hundred or three hundred columns."
"The solution could improve robotic process automation."
"Even though the company has made great improvements in online documentation, featuring rich material which includes case studies of real-life use cases, the material could definitely be better in quality and coverage of use cases."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while AuraQuantic is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi and IBM BPM. See our Appian vs. AuraQuantic report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.