Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Appian vs AuraQuantic comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Appian Logo
17,190 views|13,127 comparisons
AuraQuantic Logo
996 views|755 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Appian and AuraQuantic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Appian vs. AuraQuantic report (Updated: September 2022).
635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is business automation.""Form building capabilities and well thought out process modelling are key points to this product.""The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn.""Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster.""It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc.""The solution has a lot of strong features for the financial industry, it is very easy to use.""The solution's most valuable features are the regular periodic and quarterly updates, they are very useful updates. They keep improving the solution more often, and that helps the platform or code always be up to date with the latest features.""Appian has many valuable features, the first being the ease of development—rapid development. Second, the process of learning the product and tool is faster when compared to its peers in the market. It's closer to low-code, and while it's still not very easy, it's more low-code than other products in the industry. Appian has a good user interface, a seamless model user interface, which comes without additional coding. It can also integrate with multiple systems."

More Appian Pros →

"AuraPortal has the best price for its process.""AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible.""AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."

More AuraQuantic Pros →

Cons
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs.""Lacks integration with other products.""I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool.""One room for improvement is the ease of UI UX development, like in OutSystems and Mendix.""While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box.""The tool itself is pretty good, but the main area that we struggled with was the backend. The frontend development is really good, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit. There are good integrations, but tying them through the data layer and then up into the frontend could be improved a little bit. It does read/write on the data source, and you can configure it to just write or just read, but there is a little bit of work involved.""There are four areas I believe Appian could improve in. The first is a seamless contact center integration. Appian does not have a contact center feature. The second is advanced features in RPA. The third would be chatbot and email bot integration—while Appian comes with chatbot and email bot, it's not as mature as it should be, compared to the competition. The fourth area would be next best action, since there is not much of this sort of feature in Appian. These are all features which competitors' products have, and in a mature manner, whereas Appian lacks on these four areas. I see customers who are moving from Appian to Pega because these features are not in Appian.""The UI of Appian is more internal. Recently, there has been an addition of an external user portal for the customer-facing stuff. It's still coming out."

More Appian Cons →

"AuraQuantic's price could be improved.""One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time.""More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."

More AuraQuantic Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It's an enterprise tool and can be used by enterprise only. So it's a very expensive tool."
  • "The licensing will be on a monthly basis. We are estimating that cost to be around $2000 to maybe $3,000 per month. We don't foresee any costs above that."
  • "The pricing can be a little confusing to customers."
  • "The price of this solution is a little high here in Mongolia."
  • "The license is a bit expensive and the pricing model is sometimes confusing for new users or business users. It is difficult for them to know what volume of usage they will have to be able to purchase the best-suited license at the beginning."
  • "Appian is very flexible in their pricing. In general, Appian's pricing is much, much lower when compared to competition like Pega or other products. Appian also has a flexible licensing model across geographies. Pega usually goes with a single licensing cost—which is a US-based cost—for all global customers, and it's costly. Whereas Appian has a different regional licensing cost model and it can be cheaper, depending on geography. So Appian's licensing is very flexible, and cheaper when compared to other competition."
  • "You can't really test the software properly without actually buying the license first."
  • "More flexibility in the licensing model is still needed because initially there were customers who are looking at only one or two use cases of business areas, but now the business areas are changing and there is a larger scope. One license model may not fit everyone. They need to be a little more flexible on the licensing model."
  • More Appian Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
  • More AuraQuantic Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is easy to install and set up, and it does not come out with your audit. It has accessible process orchestration and process management. With Appian, the time to market is much faster.
    Top Answer:The licensing of Appian is less expensive when compared to other BPMs in the market.
    Top Answer:AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible.
    Top Answer:The price could be better. It's quite expensive. More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help. I haven't seen these… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    17,190
    Comparisons
    13,127
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    996
    Comparisons
    755
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    693
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
    Learn More
    Overview
    With Appian, your organization can rapidly build, deploy, use, and scale problem-solving apps. And with the flexibility of on-premises and cloud portability, you'll always address your unique challenges the way that makes the most sense for you.

    AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

    AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

    Interface

    Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

    Logic

    This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

    Data

    To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

    Application Governance

    Access rights management (to apps and app development)Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developersRole-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.


    Business Analytics

    Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

    Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

    Connectivity

    API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
    Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
    Connector builder
    REST and SOAP web services connector
    External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
    .Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
    More built-in connectors (50+)
    Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

    Offer
    Learn more about Appian
    Learn more about AuraQuantic
    Sample Customers
    Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
    Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Financial Services Firm24%
    University8%
    Healthcare Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise59%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    Appian vs. AuraQuantic
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. AuraQuantic and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    635,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Appian is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 26 reviews while AuraQuantic is ranked 31st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while AuraQuantic is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Stands out with its integration capabilities, but the backend modeling can be streamlined a little bit". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Helps organizations improve their work processes". Appian is most compared with Camunda Platform, ServiceNow, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM and Salesforce Platform, whereas AuraQuantic is most compared with IBM BPM, Pega BPM, Camunda Platform, Bizagi and Bonita. See our Appian vs. AuraQuantic report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.