We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"It's a low-code application."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The flexibility is great."
"I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"It has an open BPM"
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Bizagi and IBM BPM, whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our AuraQuantic vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.