No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

CA Process Automation vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CA Process Automation
Ranking in Process Automation
37th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Microsoft System Center Orc...
Ranking in Process Automation
34th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of CA Process Automation is 1.0%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft System Center Orchestrator1.2%
CA Process Automation1.0%
Other97.8%
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

SJ
Automation Solutions Developer at HCL Technologies
Added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience
We design end-to-end automation solutions for repetitive tasks performed by IT support teams This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests.  Built-in operators available for most integrations. Easy to manage. Attended/unattended…
Dan Campeanu - PeerSpot reviewer
Security Engineer at ProVision
Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location
The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CA Process Automation manager is a very powerful production tool."
"For our use it really does very well; it provides us exactly what we need, and it runs with low-resource utilization and moves quickly."
"Technical support is unequivocally excellent; in fact, the best customer service and technical support I’ve experienced during my 12 years in IT."
"PAM has the ability to integrate and build solutions that work well in CA's suite of service management products and those that are outside of service management."
"We took our server provisioning process from about 30 days to about 4 days on the first iteration of implementation."
"If you’re planning or looking for an application able to create process automation, stop looking."
"It has provided ROI by auto-resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
"It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."
 

Cons

"The solution engine is in Java. Regardless of developments, the solution will always be limited to what Java offers."
"CA offers minimal public information pertaining to the performance drain the usage of some objects and operators introduce to processing."
"Although it's drag-and-drop, there's a little bit of a learning curve to use it correctly."
"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."
"Better reporting, because we have to true up our licenses every three months because we license on running concurrent processes, so we have to provide a report to CA every three months using their tool -- which never works."
"It’s very complex, which is one of the disadvantages."
"A lot of times they don't get resolved, but I'm okay with those kind of responses sometimes."
"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."
"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a lot of automation savings from any process which is repeatable."
"It has provided ROI by auto resolving incidents or requests in the ITSM queue, improved MTTR and SLA adherence, and added value to the delivery of services and the customer experience."
"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."
"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
21%
Construction Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise10
No data available
 

Also Known As

CA IT Process Automation Manager
MS System Center Orchestrator
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Unum, HCL Technologies, Logicalis
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Process Automation vs. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.