Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AuraQuantic vs Automic Automation comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.
Sentiment score
4.0
Automic Automation boosts efficiency by automating workflows, reducing human interaction, cutting costs, and improving compliance and task alignment.
Automic Automation has helped reduce workload failure rates by fifty percent.
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.
Sentiment score
7.2
Automic Automation's support is knowledgeable but inconsistent; transition to Broadcom affected availability, despite positive user feedback on improvements.
They react quickly when it is urgent.
System Administrator at a government with 10,001+ employees
They are highly knowledgeable in their product area and very easy to work with.
Sr Technical Services Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
If you put the tickets in for which you need help right away, they get back to you right away.
Technical Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.
Sentiment score
7.2
Automic Automation excels in scalability, efficiently managing diverse workloads and environments, with high user satisfaction in performance and flexibility.
We have small clients running a thousand tasks per day and big enterprises running one million or two million tasks per day.
Senior Consultant at Tricise
The solution effectively supports our existing user base and is equipped to scale further.
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It does not perform real-time scalability in our environment, but because of the way we have built it, it can scale well past any thresholds with no issues.
Sr Technical Services Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.7
AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.
Sentiment score
7.9
Automic Automation provides reliable stability with minimal disruptions, high user ratings, and quick resolution of issues in well-tuned environments.
The stability of the solution is excellent.
Senior Manufacturing Engineer at Performance Technologies
In a well-tuned environment, it runs very smoothly.
Sr Technical Services Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
So far, I have not encountered any issues related to instability such as lagging, crashing, or downtime.
Senior Workload Automation Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.
Users seek improved reporting, stability, UI, compatibility, and documentation in Automic Automation, citing complexity and integration challenges.
It does not work as well for activities that require real-time input/output, but it works very well for batch, ETL, or similar cases.
Sr Technical Services Engineer at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Pricing is a major issue for some clients due to changes in Broadcom's pricing model, causing some to seek alternative solutions.
Senior IT specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
A feature that provides a dependency chart or tree diagram would be very helpful.
Senior Workload Automation Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
 

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.
Automic Automation's pricing flexibility is praised, yet Broadcom's licensing model and rising costs prompt consideration of alternatives.
Broadcom decided to change the way of licensing by moving to the number of jobs runs and then they say that clients have to pay three million because they run one million jobs per day.
Senior IT specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Due to the increased pricing, some of them are thinking of reducing tasks in Automic to have fewer executions.
Senior Consultant at Tricise
The pricing has been increasing significantly over the years, raising operational costs instead of reducing them.
Oracle Utilities Admin at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
 

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.
Automic Automation offers a user-friendly interface, cross-platform integration, robust scalability, and flexible workflow automation with real-time notifications.
A standout feature is the comprehensive versioning, allowing easy rollback to previous states.
Senior Manufacturing Engineer at Performance Technologies
Designing workflows is made easier by the graphical user interface, simplifying complex tasks.
Senior Workload Automation Consultant at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
It supports high availability by operating multiple servers concurrently, which means users do not experience outages or the need to log in again, even if some servers are updated.
System Administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic
Ranking in Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies
20th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (18th), Process Automation (19th), Low-Code Development Platforms (20th), No-Code Development Platforms (16th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (13th)
Automic Automation
Ranking in Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies
9th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
104
Ranking in other categories
Workload Automation (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Automic Automation is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Automic Automation0.3%
AuraQuantic1.0%
Other98.7%
Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies
 

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle - PeerSpot reviewer
Programmer at Banco de Guatemala
Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable
It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.
Peter Grundler - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Consultant at Tricise
Helps to move away from manual tasks and offers wide platform support and web-based interface
Customers want to move away from manual monitoring and checking processes. Automating these processes helps in time-saving and reduces human error. When you automate business processes, it reduces mistakes. It eliminates the risk of manual errors such as typos. There is a 20% to 30% reduction in human error. It fulfills all the needs when it comes to visibility and control across various operating platforms. It is the perfect product for managing processes that span multiple operating platforms. Automic Automation has the widest platform support compared to other products, such as Control-M, Tivoli from IBM, or Stonebranch. It definitely helps with compliance processes. We have had a lot of customers for two years with a focus on compliance, and it works. They were successful. Due to the fact that our customers can automate a lot of things, it reduces operating costs. It is hard to give a number because the savings are different for each customer. If a customer never had any automation, there could be about 80% savings after implementing Automic Automation, whereas for a customer who already has automated tasks, the difference will be less by adding Automic Automation. They might see 5% to 10% more savings. Automic Automation helps improve our ability to meet SLAs. In the recent versions, SLA management has been integrated, which previously was an external component. Because a lot of customers used it and asked Broadcom to implement SLA management into the workload engine, Broadcom included it. We see more and more customers running their SLA management via the Automic Automation product.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies solutions are best for your needs.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise67
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Automic Workload Automation?
The pricing was client-wise, but they are changing it to execution-wise pricing. So, we are in negotiation.
What needs improvement with Automic Workload Automation?
Automic Automation has some disadvantages; it is more simplified, and sometimes it can be complicated. The technical support by Automic, provided by Broadcom, is good with the same blocking support.
What is your primary use case for Automic Workload Automation?
I have been dealing with Automic Automation for probably around ten years. I have been both a partner with Automic, with Broadcom and with Autosys.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Automic Dollar Universe
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
ING, Adidas, 84.51, ESB
Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Automic Automation and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.