Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ArcSight Logger vs Falcon LogScale comparison

OpenText and CrowdStrike are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 6.7, while CrowdStrike is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to CrowdStrike’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CrowdStrike users who would recommend it.
ArcSight Logger
Read 31 ArcSight Logger reviews
  • 1,469 Views
  • 1,332 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Falcon LogScale
Read 3 Falcon LogScale reviews
  • 998 Views
  • 774 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Falcon LogScale compete in log management solutions. Falcon LogScale appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and user satisfaction.

Features: ArcSight Logger provides comprehensive integration capabilities, extensive compliance reporting, and robust log data analysis. Falcon LogScale offers real-time data insights, a user-friendly search mechanism, and innovative threat detection.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger users suggest enhancements in navigation, customization, and configuration ease. Falcon LogScale users want improvements in reporting functions, scalability, and customer service responsiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is known for smooth deployment but faces some configuration challenges; however, its customer service is strong. Falcon LogScale has a straightforward setup with mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger is noted for lower setup costs and commendable ROI. Falcon LogScale, while more expensive upfront, offers superior long-term value due to its advanced features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger
Ranking in Log Management
31st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Falcon LogScale
Ranking in Log Management
32nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Falcon LogScale is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Geraldo Freitas - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances our security incident investigation but not good for correlation
Investigation is good when you know what you want to search for in Logger. The most difficult part is parsing the logs and configuring the parsers. For investigation, it's good. For correlation, it's not good. We use Sentinel, and Sentinel has pre-built use cases that are much easier to configure. So, it enhances our security incident investigation. We have inbound integration, but configuring the parsers is sometimes very difficult. We only have two use cases where we have a correlation set up. We send the information to Check Point to block IP addresses when we see a lot of blocks from the same source. We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist. So, it offers the ease of integration.
Read full review
Shaik Shaheer - PeerSpot reviewer
A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management
It allows us to efficiently manage and store our data. Its compression and archiving features not only reduce storage costs but also minimize the infrastructure resources needed for data backup. Since we have multiple security solutions in place, it allows us to streamline data handling. We can selectively send security-related events to the SIEM while directing other non-security events from various tools to Falcon LogScale. This flexibility ensures that we have access to all the data we need when required, and we can easily export this data from it as necessary, optimizing our data management and making it readily available for analysis or other purposes.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist."
"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."
"ArcSight's robustness is its most valuable feature."
"In terms of ArcSight Logger's most valuable feature, it is their scalability. ArcSight's real advantage is its scalability because they have two layers, including the logger layer."
"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."
"The most valuable feature is the level of detail that you can see about certain events, even when they do not come up in the console."
"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."
"The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use."
More ArcSight Logger pros
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"One of the key features is the fast search functionality, enabling us to get results within a few seconds."
"The fast search and index-free data retention are very valuable."
 

Cons

"The console in older versions is not user-friendly."
"The solution must provide readymade connectors for different applications."
"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."
"We find that the search and access functionality is quite slow."
"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."
"The speed of Logger indexing and searching for certain bugs for some queries that we provide could be improved. It can handle a huge number of logs but it can be improved."
"In the next release, I want to see more intelligence."
"The product's connectors should work better and the user manuals need an update."
More ArcSight Logger cons
"The price could be lower."
"The integration could improve."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."
"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."
"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."
"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."
"The pricing is quite harsh."
"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."
"ArcSight is an expensive solution."
"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
6%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?
We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?
The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.
See all answers
What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?
The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...
See all answers
What do you like most about Falcon LogScale?
It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Falcon LogScale?
The integration could improve. Easy parser writing should be an option to ingest log in a human-readable format for unsupported devices. For visibility perspective, the dashboard should be more use...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Falcon LogScale?
Initially, the log was for log management. We store our logs for achieving compliance and log retention for longer periods. This function, LogScale, is now a platform where we can do correlation as...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 37% of the time
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 35% of the time
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 8% of the time
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 8% of the time
Grafana Loki vs ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki vs ArcSight Logger
Compared 5% of the time
More ArcSight Logger Competitors
Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale Logo
Elastic Stack vs Falcon LogScale
Compared 41% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Falcon LogScale
Compared 26% of the time
Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale Logo
Grafana Loki vs Falcon LogScale
Compared 11% of the time
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale Logo
Logsign Next-Gen SIEM vs Falcon LogScale
Compared 9% of the time
Datadog vs Falcon LogScale Logo
Datadog vs Falcon LogScale
Compared 7% of the time
More Falcon LogScale Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger
May 2025
ArcSight Logger reportDownload ArcSight Logger product report
Buyer's Guide
Log Management
April 2025
Falcon LogScale reportDownload Falcon LogScale product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger
No data available
 

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.
OpenText

Falcon LogScale is a modern log management tool that offers robust features for organizations seeking efficient log analysis. It provides high-speed log ingestion and query capabilities, enabling detailed insights into system performance and security events.

Falcon LogScale provides an efficient way for IT teams to handle massive volumes of log data. Its architecture supports rapid ingestion and real-time querying, making it ideal for security and operational analytics. With customizable search capabilities, it allows deep analysis to detect anomalies and troubleshoot issues effectively. Users appreciate its scalability and performance-driven approach, making it suitable for large infrastructures.

What are the most important features of Falcon LogScale?

  • High-Speed Log Ingestion: Manages vast amounts of log data swiftly and efficiently.
  • Real-Time Querying: Enables quick analysis and insights into current data.
  • Scalability: Designed to grow with the expanding needs of large organizations.
  • Customizable Searching: Offers granular search options for precise data examination.

What benefits or ROI should be anticipated?

  • Enhanced Operational Efficiency: Streamlines log analysis processes.
  • Improved Security Posture: Identifies security threats quickly through powerful search and alert capabilities.
  • Cost-Effective Scaling: Offers scalable solutions that grow with business needs.
  • Time Savings: Reduces time spent on log data management and analysis.

Falcon LogScale is particularly beneficial in industries requiring detailed compliance reporting and real-time threat detection, such as finance and healthcare. It's implemented to support security operations and incident response teams by providing timely insights and operational efficiencies.

CrowdStrike
 

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale
April 2025
Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale
Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ArcSight Logger vs. Falcon LogScale report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.