ArcSight Logger vs Elastic Security comparison

ArcSight Logger and Elastic Security are both formidable in the security information and event management category. Elastic Security seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability, threat detection capabilities, and advanced threat hunting as highlighted by user reviews.

Features: ArcSight Logger users benefit from comprehensive event log management, efficient data auditing, and detailed log analysis. Elastic Security is valued for its scalable threat detection features, superior visualization tools, and ease of integration with other data sources.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger faces integration complexities, a steep learning curve, and user challenges in mastering technical aspects. Elastic Security requires better documentation, seeks more seamless support options, and clearer configuration clarity as highlighted by users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger has a straightforward deployment requiring technical expertise and is recognized for responsive customer service. Elastic Security offers flexible deployment models but involves complex configurations and has a need for improved support channels.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger involves a high initial setup cost but offers fair ROI with its log management capabilities. Elastic Security, while also necessitating a significant upfront investment, is perceived to deliver better ROI due to integrated security features and adaptability to dynamic threats.