We performed a comparison between Apigee and Pipedream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a very efficient logging system which is easy to maintain."
"The most valuable feature is the API gateway."
"There are just a lot of security features in general."
"The analytics feature is quite good."
"The features I found most valuable are how the APIs are published, the whole process of finalizing the API, and then controlling it."
"The most valuable features are scalability and technical support."
"The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features."
"The most valuable feature is monetization."
"The most valuable features of Pipedream are the prebuilt integrations that require no coding."
"The solution enables users to integrate several things."
"It is a developer-friendly platform that allows writing custom scripts."
"The most valuable feature of Pipedream is the ability to use Python code in general."
"Apigee could do more to make users aware of what is available in the add-ons."
"We are experiencing issues with automation; the production in Apigee is quite time-consuming."
"The technical support could be improved because their response time is slow."
"Apigee is demanding on the infrastructure so the setup cost is very high for an on-premises deployment."
"iPaaS is something that we would like to see. For example, MuleSoft is kind of an integrated platform as a service (iPaaS), and it provides a lot of out-of-the-box connectors and other such things. This is where Apigee lacks. I'm not sure if that's the roadmap for Apigee, but any improvements on those lines would be helpful where things become easier to implement."
"What my clients don't like is that the on-premises solution is not being treated and maintained as well as the cloud solution."
"Compared to its competitors, such as Axway AMPLIFY API Management and Layer7 API Management, Apigee could benefit from having more policies to cater to various use cases. This would reduce the need for writing custom JavaScripts. If more features come straight out of the box, we can leverage them instead of writing custom code to achieve the same functionality."
"The account simplification process can be improved."
"There is a potential area for improvement in handling loop operations over items."
"We faced some server timeouts."
"Documentation isn't available for everything in the solution, so you may have to figure out a lot of things by yourself."
"They should give more information about trigger failure."
Apigee is ranked 2nd in API Management with 82 reviews while Pipedream is ranked 18th in API Management with 4 reviews. Apigee is rated 8.2, while Pipedream is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Apigee writes "Has a robust community and outstanding performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pipedream writes " A tool that ensures that its users see a return on investment from its use". Apigee is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, IBM API Connect, Amazon API Gateway, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas Pipedream is most compared with . See our Apigee vs. Pipedream report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.