Apigee and Kong Gateway Enterprise are competitive solutions in the API management sector. Based on the data, each has distinctive advantages with Apigee leading in developer tools and analytics, whereas Kong excels in customization and plugin flexibility.
Features: Apigee offers a Drupal-based Developer Portal, extensive analytics dashboard, and various monetization models, making it a strong choice for businesses needing detailed control and insights on API usage. Kong Gateway Enterprise is recognized for its high performance, plugin-based architecture, and Lua scripting support for customizable APIs, offering in-depth operational flexibility and integration.
Room for Improvement: Apigee requires enhancements in role-based access management, integration with version control systems, and a more straightforward installation process. Kong Gateway Enterprise could improve its developer portal, provide more isolated data plans, and enhance its policy features to maintain its competitive edge.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apigee supports multiple deployment models like public, private, on-premises, and hybrid cloud, but varies in technical support response. Kong succeeds with varied deployment environments and facilitates seamless service operations, backed by its open-source community and enterprise support.
Pricing and ROI: Apigee, while robust, comes at a higher cost primarily based on API call volumes, potentially limiting smaller companies. Kong Gateway's competitive pricing, including a community version, ensures accessibility and lower initial investment, making it attractive for startups and mid-sized firms.
They are responsive and provide assistance even during production issues.
The customer service and support are cooperative and effective in providing insights and solutions during challenges.
The technical support from Kong Gateway Enterprise would be rated about eight, as we missed local technical support.
Adding extra Cassandra databases is complex.
The scalability of this solution would be rated about eight or nine.
Apigee is stable, and we have had the system running on Apigee servers for more than four years without any stability issues.
Apigee only allows validation of transactions up to a four-hour period, which requires manual hovering over the date and time.
Apigee should also incorporate these capabilities, especially in the on-premises version.
Analytics is one of the areas needing enhancement, specifically more visibility and control over traffic to improve capacity management and high availability.
More plugins for additional integrations would be helpful and openness for traditional development languages, such as .NET, because many enterprises are looking for .NET solutions or incorporating with .NET solutions.
Apigee is costlier compared to other solutions.
Apigee's product cost is quite high compared to other products.
Apigee is perceived as slightly costly compared to other tools in the market.
It provides all the necessary capabilities for current technologies, enabling communication and translation between protocols, along with supporting stringent security features.
The features for API security have been significant with Apigee.
Apigee's analytics capabilities aid in monitoring and optimizing APIs, which are also beneficial for our operations.
The most valuable features of Kong Gateway Enterprise are its seamless integration with Kubernetes and cloud, many plugins that can be incorporated in a solution, and its incorporation with low-code function systems.
Apigee is a platform for developing and managing APIs. Apigee offers an interface for your core services by wrapping them with a proxy layer which is then accessed by other developers. With Apigee, you can design and build APIs and then securely share their services and data without exposing any code.
Because app developers make HTTP requests to an API proxy rather than directly to your services, your services are separated from the developers. All the developer needs to know is the URL of the API proxy endpoint, necessary query parameters, authorization credentials (if they exist), and the response data format.
The API proxy isolates the app developer from your backend service. Therefore, you are free to change the service implementation if the public API remains consistent. By maintaining a consistent frontend API, existing client apps will continue to work regardless of changes on the backend.
Key capabilities of the Apigee API management platform include:
Reviews from Real Users:
Apigee stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Several major ones are its rich developer portal, its advanced analytics, and its central monitoring system.
Carlos R., a software architect at Caja Los Andes writes, “The central monitoring feature is the most valuable. It also provides security for the APIs and high availability for our use cases. Apigee is the best product in the industry in comparison to other API management solutions. It helps in fast development, which is a top point. It also supports a lot of industry standards and has excellent documentation.”
An associate vice president at a tech services company notes, “The analytics function and the developer portal are the two valuable features of Apigee. The analytics part is very good, and the developer portal is quite rich in features. The authentication mechanisms are quite easily built into Apigee, which is something that most of the other products have also now started supporting.”
Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.