Apica vs Rapid7 InsightOps comparison

Apica and Rapid7 are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Rapid7 is ranked #31 with an average rating of 9.0. Apica holds a 0.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Rapid7’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Rapid7 users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

1,035 Views
424 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Rapid7 InsightOps

Read 9 Rapid7 InsightOps reviews

744 Views
684 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

Rapid7 InsightOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and Rapid7 InsightOps are competitors in IT performance monitoring and security operation management. Rapid7 InsightOps holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive functionality and advanced features, despite Apica's competitive pricing and strong customer support.

Features: Apica offers synthetic monitoring capabilities, macro-level insights, and valuable downtime alerts. Rapid7 InsightOps provides unified visibility, advanced threat intelligence, and automated incident response with extensive integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Apica could improve dashboard customization, integrations with third-party applications, and alert precision. Rapid7 InsightOps may benefit from increased alert accuracy, expanded device compatibility, and streamlined setup procedures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is praised for its straightforward deployment and accessible customer service. While Rapid7 InsightOps offers efficient customer support and training resources, its initial setup is noted as complex due to its myriad features.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is favored for its affordable setup costs suited for small to medium enterprises, offering good value. Rapid7 InsightOps, though costly, provides a comprehensive feature set and enhanced security, suggesting a satisfactory ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in Log Management

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

Rapid7 InsightOps

Ranking in Log Management

31st

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Rapid7 InsightOps is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Karthick Selvam

Senior Software Engineer at Saama

A cloud solution to collect and analyse logs with timely support

We should understand the basic concepts of Rapid7 InsightOps. We are using Rapid7 InsightOps to collect and analyze data. We need to ensure that our environment is suitable before proceeding. The solution is user-friendly and support all environment like Linux, Windows, CentOS, etc. It is suitable for all. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Anyone can understand the solution easily because it doesn't require a specific scripted language."

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integrate with other tools with a separate execution environment. The tool is also easy to use."

"From our standpoint, there are a number of valuable features. The WebHooks are obviously really great. The alert framework is really good and then the reporting and visualizations that you get from the dashboards is good. Those three areas are primarily what my team's focused on in terms of usage from day to day."

"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."

"It uses a basic scripting language, which is easy to learn and customize as needed. Compared to LoadRunner, I found writing and customizing code much easier in Apica."

More Apica pros

"We can save logs as plain text."

"The most valuable feature of Rapid7 InsightOps is the search functionality."

"The ability to browse logs from multiple sources at the same time really speeds up root cause analysis."

"It has the ability to alert and track logs from different sources."

"Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency."

Cons

"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

"If you are adding any input file, the tool fails to capture the path."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"The having to install an application on your desktop to utilize something like ZebraTester is a little cumbersome. It would be nice to see that become a web-based application. Having the documentation a little more accessible, and easier to digest by people who are just learning how to use the framework, especially when it comes to more complex or more edge-based cases would be really helpful to have."

"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."

More Apica cons

"There are a few things I would like to do with a few more complex queries which I am not able to do right now, because it is a SaaS solution."

"Rapid7 InsightOps could improve by making the search query better. There are times when the search query is broken and it does not find anything."

"Since I used the beta, improvements are to be expected. The dashboard options could have been clearer, but I believe it is more a problem with the limited documentation available at the time."

"The solution takes a little bit of time when we load the website for the first time."

"Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"I am sure that Apica's price will be lower than LoadRunner."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"The product is cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Media Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Rapid7 InsightOps?

Integration of InsightOps with other tools, especially SIEM solutions, has generally improved operational efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rapid7 InsightOps?

Improvement is needed in the dashboard of InsightOps, especially for less technical users. Currently, it lacks clear guidance on icons and features, making it confusing for those with limited exper...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rapid7 InsightOps?

Our clients use InsightOps for real-time monitoring of their IT environments.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 26% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 22% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 15% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 14% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Wazuh vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 31% of the time

Datadog vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 26% of the time

Dynatrace vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 11% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs Rapid7 InsightOps

Compared 10% of the time

More Rapid7 InsightOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

July 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

July 2025

Download Rapid7 InsightOps product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

InsightOps, Logentries

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?

Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally

Which benefits should users expect from Apica?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

Rapid7 InsightOps is the next evolution of the Logentries log management technology, combining cloud-based log centralization with IT asset search to make log management fast and easy.

As a cloud-based solution, InsightOps eliminates the need for managing and maintaining your log management technology. With a 5-minute setup, out-of-the-box analytics and visual search capabilities that eliminates the need to learn a new query language, InsightOps is the easiest log management solution available.

To start a free 30-day trial of InsightOps, visit rapid7.com/insightops

Rapid7

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Trimble Navigation Limited

Buyer's Guide

Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

July 2025

Free Report: Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apica vs. Rapid7 InsightOps report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.