Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apica vs Microsoft Purview Audit comparison

Apica and Microsoft are both solutions in the Log Management category. Apica is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.7, while Microsoft is ranked #39 with an average rating of 8.0. Apica holds a 0.3% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Microsoft’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Apica
Read 11 Apica reviews
  • 1,060 Views
  • 435 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
Microsoft Purview Audit
Read 2 Microsoft Purview Audit reviews
  • 944 Views
  • 604 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Apica and Microsoft Purview Audit compete in the performance monitoring and auditing category. Apica holds an advantage in customer support and cost-effectiveness, while Microsoft Purview Audit leads with its robust auditing features.

Features: Apica is recognized for its reliable monitoring, strong alerting system, and cost-effectiveness. Microsoft Purview Audit excels in audit log management, detailed reporting, and regulatory compliance features.

Room for Improvement: Apica could improve its analytics capabilities, simplify configuration processes, and enhance documentation. Microsoft Purview Audit users seek more intuitive access to features, improved documentation, and easier configuration adjustments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apica is praised for straightforward deployment and a responsive support team. Microsoft Purview Audit, although complex to deploy, provides comprehensive support once set up properly.

Pricing and ROI: Apica is noted for competitive pricing and high ROI through effective monitoring. Microsoft Purview Audit, despite higher initial setup costs, demonstrates consistent ROI in compliance-driven sectors.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apica
Ranking in Log Management
18th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), IT Operations Analytics (5th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)
Microsoft Purview Audit
Ranking in Log Management
39th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (32nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Apica is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Purview Audit is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Punith H K - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features
It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.
Read full review
Nagendra Nekkala - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to create a user in the cloud and give them access to resources through a single workflow
The PAM for Active Directory is good. ActiveOps is quite useful as a feature. The One Identity active role enables us to create a user in the cloud and give them access to resources through a single workflow. We can create rules-based access. It helps us control audit management and IT access management. We can decide what people can access and detect job functions. It enables zero trust security with hybrid AD, find delegation, and role-based access control. It provides all certificates and provides secure authentication, call-based access control, et cetera. It's really important for my critical applications. We can see who's using what, whether they are authorized, and other information to decide what access to offer. With the active role console, I can find out the obvious issues and also perform a decent setup. The One Identity active roles enable us to reduce password reset times. We can handle tasks in a matter of a minute. It simplifies AD and Azure AD management, efficiency, and security overall. The password manager is very secure and is a self-service password manager solution. It is considerably decreasing my help desk tasks. Our engineering users can reset forgotten passwords, and it can implement a stronger password. The management around access to enterprise resources keeps my data and systems secure. We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution. The migration from AD to Azure AD is very easy. There are simple configurations, and the migration goes rather smoothly. We use the solution support for SaaS apps through Cloud Delivered SCIM connectors. There are controls that can be configured and we can add and set permissions easily.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Apica allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."
"There are several features that are really good. The first one is the flexibility and the advanced configuration that Apica offers when it comes to configuring synthetic checks. It provides the ability to customize how the check should be performed and it is very flexible in the number of synthetic locations that it can use. It allows us to run scripts from different locations all over the world, and they have a really good number of these locations."
"The solution captures all our requests and responses."
"We see the benefit almost every day. It allows us to be alerted whenever there is a store that is not responding properly around the world. We do have a network operation center (NOC) who receives these alerts, immediately checking if everything is okay."
"It is easy for beginners to learn and use Apica."
"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."
"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."
"One of the biggest advantages of moving to Apica is the ability get to a hybrid model with the architecture in the cloud and our agents on-prem. We also have access to Apica's cloud agent across the globe. That has changed the way that we have our load testing setup at this point. Previously, it was always internal. Now, with this change in the way it is implemented for load testing, we can test anywhere across the globe and from the list of agents available within Apica's cloud. If I don't have an agent available in a second location, it just takes an email to their customer support, then it is spun up within 24 hours. That flexibility has changed the way that we perceive our load tests, not just in the US, but globally."
More Apica pros
"The platform has significantly enhanced our operational insight into the overall Microsoft 365 environment."
"We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution."
 

Cons

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."
"The initial screen on their dashboard could have a bit more data, but this is a small thing. It could have more data, so we do not need to drill down to a screen behind that initial information. I would like them to get a little better on the user interfaces that we need to go into."
"I have noticed that the tool isn't widely recognized outside our organization. Also, there aren't any tutorials or dedicated resources for this tool, making it challenging for newcomers to learn. It would be beneficial if someone experienced with it could provide guidance."
"Apica should add more features and integrations with different tools and certain ticketing systems, like ServiceNow."
"The tool does not provide automatic correlation features."
"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."
"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."
"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."
More Apica cons
"We do have a Denial of Access happening."
"Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."
"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."
"The pricing is fair. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."
"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."
"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."
"Apica is pretty cost-effective if you buy both solutions together: Synthetic and LoadTest. If you are going for one solution, the cost is on par with any tool in the market."
"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."
"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."
More Apica pricing and cost advice
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Media Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Retailer
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Educational Organization
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?
The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?
I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?
Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Audit?
I'm not aware of the pricing of licensing terms.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Audit?
Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Audit?
We utilize Microsoft Purview Audit for monitoring security and compliance aspects.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica Logo
Dynatrace vs Apica
Compared 27% of the time
Cribl vs Apica Logo
Cribl vs Apica
Compared 19% of the time
AlertSite vs Apica Logo
AlertSite vs Apica
Compared 12% of the time
Datadog vs Apica Logo
Datadog vs Apica
Compared 12% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Apica
Compared 11% of the time
More Apica Competitors
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 8% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 8% of the time
Datadog vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Datadog vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 8% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 7% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Apica
August 2025
Apica reportDownload Apica product report
Buyer's Guide
Log Management
July 2025
Microsoft Purview Audit reportDownload Microsoft Purview Audit product report
 

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic
No data available
 

Overview

Apica leads in observability cost optimization, empowering IT teams to manage telemetry data economics efficiently. It supports various data types, reducing costs by 40% with flexible deployment options and eliminating tool sprawl through modular solutions.

Apica Ascent optimizes observability costs across metrics, logs, traces, and events and provides adaptability beyond proprietary formats. Its patented InstaStore™ technology ensures maximum storage efficiency and advanced root cause analysis. Organizations leverage Apica for comprehensive control over observability investments, reducing runaway costs. With solutions for mitigating high-cardinality data challenges, Apica supports any data lake preference and offers cloud or on-premises deployments. Its modular solutions eliminate unnecessary tool redundancies, enhancing economic efficiency in telemetry data management.

What features define Apica's capabilities?
  • Global Presence: Extensive points of presence worldwide
  • Advanced Alerting: Accurate system notifications
  • Robust Scripting: Supports multiple protocols easily
  • Flexible Integration: Effortless system connections
  • Environment Simulation: Adapts various test scenarios globally
Which benefits should users expect from Apica?
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces observability costs by 40%
  • Data Flexibility: Supports any data source
  • Modular Approach: Eliminates tool redundancies
  • Advanced Analysis: Enhanced root cause capabilities
  • Deployment Variety: Cloud and on-premises options available

Apica addresses industry needs in monitoring and testing applications, enhancing user experience across sectors. It is instrumental in synthetic checks, load testing, API monitoring, and validating functionalities for stability in gaming, finance, eCommerce, and banking platforms. Apica's versatility supports both on-premises and cloud environments, ensuring accurate insights into service availability and network performance.

Apica

The unified auditing functionality in Microsoft 365 provides organizations with visibility into many types of audited activities across many different services in Microsoft 365. Advanced Audit helps organizations to conduct forensic and compliance investigations by increasing audit log retention required to conduct an investigation, providing access to crucial events that help determine scope of compromise, and faster access to Office 365 Management Activity API.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
July 2025
Free Report: Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit
Find out what your peers are saying about Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Apica vs. Microsoft Purview Audit report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.