Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Purview Audit vs Splunk Enterprise Security comparison

Microsoft and Splunk are both solutions in the Log Management category. Microsoft is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.0, while Splunk is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Splunk’s 7.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Purview Audit
Read 2 Microsoft Purview Audit reviews
  • 956 Views
  • 621 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Splunk Enterprise Security
Read 319 Splunk Enterprise Security reviews
  • 25,544 Views
  • 14,305 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Splunk Enterprise Security and Microsoft Purview Audit compete in the cybersecurity space. Splunk Enterprise Security offers more robust features, potentially giving it an advantage in threat analytics, while Microsoft Purview Audit presents a lower cost solution, making it appealing for budget-conscious organizations.

Features: Splunk Enterprise Security provides real-time threat detection, comprehensive analytics, and the ability to integrate with a wide range of data sources. Microsoft Purview Audit focuses on centralized data collection and compliance management, integrating smoothly with Microsoft solutions. Splunk prioritizes depth in threat analytics, while Microsoft emphasizes integration and governance controls.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft offers quick, easy setup through cloud-based deployment, especially advantageous for users in the Microsoft ecosystem. In contrast, Splunk’s broader integration capability might require more time and expertise to deploy. Microsoft Purview Audit receives positive feedback for customer service and support, whereas Splunk offers extensive community and direct support, albeit with higher complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Audit provides a cost-effective solution with lower setup costs, offering strong ROI particularly for organizations already using Microsoft services. Splunk Enterprise Security features powerful analytics, which tend to have higher setup costs, potentially justified for businesses needing advanced security analytics. Microsoft Purview Audit appears more budget-friendly, while Splunk offers greater ROI for those needing comprehensive security solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 863,564 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Purview Audit
Ranking in Log Management
41st
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (32nd)
Splunk Enterprise Security
Ranking in Log Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
319
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (1st), IT Operations Analytics (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Audit is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Enterprise Security is 7.3%, down from 10.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Nagendra Nekkala - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to create a user in the cloud and give them access to resources through a single workflow
The PAM for Active Directory is good. ActiveOps is quite useful as a feature. The One Identity active role enables us to create a user in the cloud and give them access to resources through a single workflow. We can create rules-based access. It helps us control audit management and IT access management. We can decide what people can access and detect job functions. It enables zero trust security with hybrid AD, find delegation, and role-based access control. It provides all certificates and provides secure authentication, call-based access control, et cetera. It's really important for my critical applications. We can see who's using what, whether they are authorized, and other information to decide what access to offer. With the active role console, I can find out the obvious issues and also perform a decent setup. The One Identity active roles enable us to reduce password reset times. We can handle tasks in a matter of a minute. It simplifies AD and Azure AD management, efficiency, and security overall. The password manager is very secure and is a self-service password manager solution. It is considerably decreasing my help desk tasks. Our engineering users can reset forgotten passwords, and it can implement a stronger password. The management around access to enterprise resources keeps my data and systems secure. We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution. The migration from AD to Azure AD is very easy. There are simple configurations, and the migration goes rather smoothly. We use the solution support for SaaS apps through Cloud Delivered SCIM connectors. There are controls that can be configured and we can add and set permissions easily.
Read full review
ROBERT-CHRISTIAN - PeerSpot reviewer
Has many predefined correlation rules and is brilliant for investigation and log analysis
It is very complicated to write your own correlation rules without the help of Splunk support. What Splunk could do better is to create an API to the standard SIEM tools, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The idea would be to make it less painful. In ELK Stack, Kibana is the query language with which you can search log files. I believe Splunk has also a query language in which they search their log files, but once you have identified the log file that you want to use for further security correlation, you want to very quickly transport that into your SIEM tool, such as Microsoft Sentinel. That is something that Splunk could make a little bit less painful because it is a lot of effort to find that log file and forward it. An API with Microsoft Sentinel or a similar SIEM tool would be a good idea.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The platform has significantly enhanced our operational insight into the overall Microsoft 365 environment."
"We're easily saving at least one hour per day using this solution."
"Speeds up root cause analysis and can help identify issues that your organization never realized were occurring."
"The most valuable feature of Splunk is the log monitoring."
"It has a rapid response search environment in the event of an incident."
"Its search is very flexible, allowing you to search anything by typing a sentence."
"Splunk works based on parsing log files."
"Splunk's interface is user-friendly, and it has apps and add-ons for most applications. We can easily normalize the data to make it readable and understand the logs. We easily get all the field extractions and enrichment done by using the apps and add-ons. This helps us understand the application logs because the raw data is useless unless we extract some useful information from it. These add-ons make it so much easier."
"The product is good, it satisfies our customers."
"The most valuable function is the notable events. When I joined the team, I asked them what they could currently see, and they said nothing. I was pretty shocked. I know for a fact that they're using Enterprise Security or at least they had purchased it. I told them that there are several dashboards within Splunk that we can leverage. There is also notable events where we can see potential incidents or potential alerts about the infrastructure and the network itself."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pros
 

Cons

"We do have a Denial of Access happening."
"Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features."
"Splunk should align its security principles with those of other vendors like SentinelOne. Splunk has mature APIs that can communicate with various security applications and devices. Splunk can process more to produce an understandable dashboard."
"The threat detection library needs to increase the frequency at which the playbooks are updated."
"I find the graphical options really limited and you don't have enough control over how to display the data that you want to see."
"Areas of Splunk Enterprise Security that could be improved include the need for training and certifications. We are planning to do certifications, and there are many features, such as risk-based score and score detection, where the current training doesn't provide visibility to the analyst."
"Splunk isn't appropriate for smaller companies. It's too expensive."
"The GUI can be improved to include some of the capabilities that other BI solutions have."
"You can run a script from an event, but it needs many clicks to run that integration, which could be made easier."
"It works as intended for us, and we are getting everything that we need out of it. If anything, its initial setup can be improved a bit."
More Splunk Enterprise Security cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing seems good relative to the other vendors that we have had here. However, they need to find ways to be more flexible with the licensing and be able to deal with situations where we start generating more logs. Maybe having some controls in the Splunk interface to turn it off, so we don't have to change anything in our application."
"It is expensive. I work for multiple clients. I am working for more than five clients, but most of the clients are switching from Splunk to Sentinel because of the cost. Even though Sentinel is very limited, clients are moving to Sentinel."
"Pricing and licensing are quite high compared to other tools or SIEM tools, but the features justify it."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is expensive."
"I think the price could be improved."
"The licensing is good, but the pricing absolutely needs some work. It is very high."
"The price of Splunk Enterprise Security is reasonable, falling somewhere in the middle range."
"Splunk Enterprise Security is priced lower than competitors."
More Splunk Enterprise Security pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
863,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Feb 26, 2015
HP ArcSight vs. IBM QRadar vs. ​McAfee Nitro vs. Splunk vs. RSA Security vs. LogRhythm
We at Infosecnirvana.com have done several posts on SIEM. After the Dummies Guide on SIEM, we are following it up with a SIEM Product Comparison – 101 deck. So, here it is for your viewing pleasure. Let me know what you think by posting your comments below. The key products compared here are…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Purview Audit?
I'm not aware of the pricing of licensing terms.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Microsoft Purview Audit?
Areas for product improvement include enhancing customization options and integrating more comprehensive compliance features.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Purview Audit?
We utilize Microsoft Purview Audit for monitoring security and compliance aspects.
See all answers
What SOC product do you recommend?
For tools I’d recommend: -SIEM- LogRhythm -SOAR- Palo Alto XSOAR Doing commercial w/o both (or at least an XDR) is asking to miss details that are critical, and ending up a statistic. Also, rememb...
See all answers
What is a better choice, Splunk or Azure Sentinel?
It would really depend on (1) which logs you need to ingest and (2) what are your use cases Splunk is easy for ingestion of anything, but the charge per GB/Day Indexed and it gets expensive as log ...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Sentinel vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 12% of the time
Datadog vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Datadog vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 10% of the time
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Microsoft Purview eDiscovery vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 10% of the time
Splunk Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Splunk Cloud Platform vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 10% of the time
Elastic Stack vs Microsoft Purview Audit Logo
Elastic Stack vs Microsoft Purview Audit
Compared 7% of the time
More Microsoft Purview Audit Competitors
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
IBM Security QRadar vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Wazuh vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 8% of the time
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 7% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Datadog vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 5% of the time
Security Onion vs Splunk Enterprise Security Logo
Security Onion vs Splunk Enterprise Security
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Enterprise Security Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Log Management
July 2025
Microsoft Purview Audit reportDownload Microsoft Purview Audit product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Enterprise Security
June 2025
Splunk Enterprise Security reportDownload Splunk Enterprise Security product report
 

Overview

The unified auditing functionality in Microsoft 365 provides organizations with visibility into many types of audited activities across many different services in Microsoft 365. Advanced Audit helps organizations to conduct forensic and compliance investigations by increasing audit log retention required to conduct an investigation, providing access to crucial events that help determine scope of compromise, and faster access to Office 365 Management Activity API.

Microsoft

Splunk Enterprise Security is widely used for security operations, including threat detection, incident response, and log monitoring. It centralizes log management, offers security analytics, and ensures compliance, enhancing the overall security posture of organizations.

Companies leverage Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor endpoints, networks, and users, detecting anomalies, brute force attacks, and unauthorized access. They use it for fraud detection, machine learning, and real-time alerts within their SOCs. The platform enhances visibility and correlates data from multiple sources to identify security threats efficiently. Key features include comprehensive dashboards, excellent reporting capabilities, robust log aggregation, and flexible data ingestion. Users appreciate its SIEM capabilities, threat intelligence, risk-based alerting, and correlation searches. Highly scalable and stable, it suits multi-cloud environments, reducing alert volumes and speeding up investigations.

What are the key features?
  • Comprehensive Dashboards: Provide a holistic view of security operations.
  • Flexible Data Ingestion: Supports various data sources for better analysis.
  • Robust Log Aggregation: Centralizes log management for easier monitoring.
  • Machine Learning Toolkit: Enhances threat detection and prediction capabilities.
  • SIEM Capabilities: Integrates security information and event management.
  • Threat Intelligence: Utilizes external information to improve security measures.
  • Risk-Based Alerting: Prioritizes alerts based on the risk they pose.
  • Correlation Searches: Identifies and correlates security events effectively.
What benefits or ROI should users look for?
  • Enhanced Visibility: Improves monitoring across endpoints, networks, and users.
  • Faster Incident Response: Speeds up identification and resolution of security issues.
  • Reduced Alert Volumes: Lowers false positives and enhances signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Scalability: Adapts to growing and changing security needs.
  • Improved Security Operations: Integrates multiple security facets into one platform.

Splunk Enterprise Security is implemented across industries like finance, healthcare, and retail. Financial institutions use it for fraud detection and compliance, while healthcare organizations leverage its capabilities to safeguard patient data. Retailers deploy it to protect customer information and ensure secure transactions.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Splunk has more than 7,000 customers spread across over 90 countries. These customers include Telenor, UniCredit, ideeli, McKenney's, Tesco, and SurveyMonkey.
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
July 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
863,564 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Purview Audit vs. Splunk Enterprise Security report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.