Apica vs INETCO Insight comparison

Apica and INETCO are both solutions in the IT Operations Analytics category. Apica is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while INETCO is ranked #23. Apica holds a 1.7% mindshare in IOA, compared to INETCO’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Apica users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of INETCO users who would recommend it.

Apica

Read 11 Apica reviews

169 Views
6 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

INETCO Insight

Read 2 INETCO Insight reviews

55 Views
5 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apica

INETCO Insight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

INETCO Insight and Apica are competitors in the network monitoring and performance sector. While INETCO Insight offers competitive pricing and support, Apica provides a more comprehensive set of features, appealing to those seeking advanced monitoring capabilities.

Features: INETCO Insight includes real-time transaction monitoring, detailed network performance analytics, and comprehensive visibility tools. Apica offers synthetic monitoring, real-user monitoring, and flexible alerting options, presenting a diverse and versatile solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: INETCO Insight emphasizes straightforward deployment with easy integration and responsive customer service. Apica focuses on scalable deployment with robust support, catering to organizations with complex needs.

Pricing and ROI: INETCO Insight provides attractive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious entities aiming for essential monitoring. Apica's higher price is justified by its extensive features and greater ROI potential, offering detailed insights and performance optimization opportunities.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Operations Analytics Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apica

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (17th), Log Management (17th), Observability Pipeline Software (2nd)

INETCO Insight

Ranking in IT Operations Analytics

23rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Payment Processing Software (43rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the IT Operations Analytics category, the mindshare of Apica is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of INETCO Insight is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Operations Analytics

Featured Reviews

Punith H K

Senior Systems Engineer at Infosys

Enables users to create scripts easily and provides excellent real-time monitoring features

It is easy to create scripts. We don't have to write any script. Ready-made options are available. We can select, drag, and drop the options, and the script is ready. The solution’s real-time monitoring features have had a huge impact on our service delivery. If we have an application and the script for it, we keep monitoring it. When the script goes red, it indicates that something is not working. So, we check and analyze the applications. We keep track of applications and monitor whether they are live or not. The tool is also useful for monitoring cloud services.

Read full review

Olga Guerra

Owner / IT Consultant with 1-10 employees

Provides real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution

INETCO offers monitoring that helps the customer to have a quick way to detect their problems. It shows quickly the root cause of problems, and can give specific details from the transaction (from when the transaction started). It shows a lot of details related to that transaction. * It's a non-intrusive solution. * It provides real-time information alerts. * We can have a real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution. The customer can save time and money because it's a way of detecting the root cause of problems. For banks, it helps customers from fraud that many banks are experiencing. Therefore, customers can be more secure in their transactions, and banks can monitor fraud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the ZebraTester, the ability to have and store dynamic variables, when setting up the monitors, means you can extract that value and use it in a subsequent service call. This is something that has made our lives easier... This is one of the features that I like the most because it helps us in configuring these services, in a certain flow, without the need to re-record the whole thing."

"I like the transcript download feature. And with UI scripting, it's helpful that Apica handles a lot of the backend work automatically. I don't have to tag everything manually, though I can tag elements later if needed. It's really good at recording the steps."

"The solution captures all our requests and responses."

"As always, within the IT industry, everybody's always looking to upgrade and update everything else like that. Apica has been one of those things but it's really hard to replace because it offers us the unique capability to see what the customer is seeing. A lot of other ones can do Selenium script and things like that, but there's a lot in Apica that we use right now. We utilize a lot of the scenario options in Apica right now, and there's a lot of other ones that do parts of it, but it doesn't do everything that Apica does."

"APICa allows me to record APIs easily and enhances scripts through options like auto-correlation, enabling me to access dynamic fields."

"What I like the most is that Apica can simulate different browsers and different versions of desktop or mobile browsers."

"Our application SREs do script checks in such a way that closely mimic our customers' actions using the platform. Because there are so many different ways and options to be able to configure checks to closely mirror your applications' capabilities, it provides a lot of optionality for teams to create the right type of check that can notify when there are any issues. At the end of the day, we want our monitoring tools to be able to catch any outage before our customers do. This is where Apica Synthetic does a great job."

"You can tell from the operational space of people who are using and consuming this data that they are more integrated. It is not dependent on one team anymore. It saves a lot of time by capturing and pinpointing the exact problem that is happening quickly. We have moved from getting escalations manually to getting escalations synthetically."

More Apica pros

"This can help customers who already have a lot of monitoring providers consolidate what they have."

"It provides real-time information alerts."

"We can have a real-time detection for the root cause of problems, minimizing time to resolution."

Cons

"Apica is costly, and there's no way to test mobile applications through Apica."

"The reporting part that we use for our executives needs a bit more customization capabilities. Right now, you can use only the three main templates for reporting. We would like to be able to customize them."

"Alerting needs improvement. It's a little noisy. It needs some better options. Currently, they have an issue, when you set up a synthetic monitor, you can set up where it's monitoring from, a data center that Apica owns."

"Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently."

"We have been focused on reducing polling times for synthetic checks. We have gone from 10 minutes down to five minutes for a pretty broad swath, but there is some appetite to reduce that further, which could be an improvement."

"It is difficult to create a script using ZebraTester."

"Apica was a relatively new tool when I started using it. Although Apica had good documentation, it still felt less developed or advanced than a tool like LoadRunner."

"There are some components of the user interface that are not up to date. Just to give you an idea, today we have web applications that are called single-page applications that are much faster than the old style of web application. If we can move faster into the flow of the graphic user interface, and in a more effective way, it will save us a lot of time."

More Apica cons

"It would help to have historical information."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap."

"The product is less expensive compared to LoadRunner."

"License management is another area that Apica could do better. We have already had these conversations with our account teams. This is something that they are looking at largely improving in upcoming releases. I believe that this is already on their roadmap."

"The pricing and licensing are very reasonable. At the end of the day, you are using their technology/software and getting X amount of checks for a very decent value. As for discounts, they try to meet your budgets as much as they can. For example, if you need 100 checks and you have X amount of budget for it, then they will try and get down to that price. Costing-wise, it is a reasonably cost product. They will always try and come down to your price if you need them to come down to it by knocking off certain areas."

"Another main difference between Apica and the other products was the cost. We really thought that the balance in Apica between the features and costs was the best among all the products on which we did a PoC."

"The solution's pricing is not cheap, but it is in the midrange."

"I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides."

"The level of alerting accuracy has saved us time and money in operational costs. Overall, it has automated a lot of the manual efforts which have been more complex with some of our other scripting tools or monitors. So, it brings things together by doing things faster and saves us money."

More Apica pricing and cost advice

"Customers can save costs (time and money) by integrating with this tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Operations Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

10%

Media Company

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apica Synthetic?

The GUI is powerful and doesn't require scripting or regular expressions. It has a vast finder for correlation, which is easier than other tools like JMeter and LoadRunner. It's also easy to integr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apica Synthetic?

I know Apica is an expensive solution, but it is worth the money for the service it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apica Synthetic?

Apica cannot perform endurance or scale-up tests independently. It requires other tools like ALM. When editing scripts, only one can be accessed at a time, risking changes affecting other folders. ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs Apica

Compared 28% of the time

Cribl vs Apica

Compared 21% of the time

Datadog vs Apica

Compared 16% of the time

AlertSite vs Apica

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Apica

Compared 12% of the time

More Apica Competitors

Dynatrace vs INETCO Insight

Compared 100% of the time

More INETCO Insight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apica

June 2025

Download Apica product report

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

June 2025

Download INETCO Insight product report

Also Known As

Apica LoadTest, Apica Synthetic

No data available

Overview

Apica offers a unified platform to remove complexity and cost associated with data management. You collect, control, store, and observe your data and can quickly identify and resolve performance issues before they impact the end-user. Apica Ascent swiftly analyzes telemetry data in real-time, enabling prompt issue resolution, while automated root cause analysis, powered by machine learning, streamlines troubleshooting in complex distributed systems. The platform simplifies data collection by automating and managing agents through the platform’s Fleet product. Its Flow product simplifies and optimizes pipeline control with AI and ML to help you easily understand complex workflows. Its Store component allows you to never run out of storage space while you index and store machine data centrally on one platform and reduce costs, and remediate faster. Observe offers modern observability data management, helping you with MELT data, effortless dashboarding, and seamless integration of synthetic and real data.

Experience the Apica Ascent Platform

Apica

INETCO Insight is the only application monitoring software for IT operations teams that captures every network transaction in real-time, correlates all application, infrastructure and response time data, and isolates underperforming application and network components.

INETCO

Sample Customers

HBO, JPMC, Morgan Stanley, Xander, EA Sports, Volvo

Nedbank, Sinergia, FIS, TNS (Calypso Canada), Moneris Solutions, Travelex, Telecom New Zealand (Gen-i), Open Solutions Canada (Fiserv), Transaction Junction, Blue Shore Financial

Buyer's Guide

IT Operations Analytics

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, New Relic, IBM and others in IT Operations Analytics. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Operations Analytics vendors.

We monitor all IT Operations Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.