We performed a comparison between Apache Subversion and Bitbucket based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have developed automation to speed up common repetitive processes."
"Apache Subversion is a scalable solution."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"The tool's automation helped because we onboarded a lot of projects and teams into Bitbucket. The product's automation helped us complete activities in two days which previously used to take around two weeks to complete. We have completely automated processes that were earlier manual. It has good integration with Jira and Jenkins."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"It seems to be quite scalable."
"Apache Subversion should be easier to use."
"The most valuable feature is CLI."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"Bitbucket could improve search and indexing capabilities. There is only basic searching available. There is only the ability to index the main branch but not the subbranches. The search capabilities are dodgy."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
Apache Subversion is ranked 9th in Version Control with 4 reviews while Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews. Apache Subversion is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Apache Subversion writes "Centralized repository, but the stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". Apache Subversion is most compared with IBM Rational ClearCase, whereas Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, Atlassian SourceTree and Liquibase. See our Apache Subversion vs. Bitbucket report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.